DS Forums

 
 

EE - Is there a reason behind making Kat and Ronnie pregnant at the same time again?


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-07-2014, 12:16
fawltytowers93
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,828

This is the second time both Kat and Ronnie are pregnant at the same time together.

Obviously their pregnancies don't tie in this time, as Kat will give birth quite some time before Ronnie does.

Is there a reason behind them doing this again? There obviously won't be anymore baby-swapping or cot deaths, but do you think the writers could have something else planned here?
fawltytowers93 is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 03-07-2014, 12:20
CriticFan
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 978
Kat and Ronnie could take their babys to nursery and thats when the swapping starts.
CriticFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2014, 12:33
Kim_x
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,444
Ronnie's seemed to be a sudden change of direction, so I would say no.

I would like to see Kat/Alfie a little anxious over it when they find out, though. It didn't make sense to me that they haven't mentioned Tommy's kidnapper being two doors away.
Kim_x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2014, 12:38
Broken_Arrow
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Suck it
Posts: 7,777
Yes. Ronnie has lost her baby and is coming back for one of Kat's twins. The baby swap storyline was such a success the writers have decided to do it again.
Broken_Arrow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2014, 13:06
IanMandy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Hogwarts
Posts: 13,486
Kats gonna plot revenge and steal Ronnies kid this time
IanMandy is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2014, 13:12
CUP OF TEAAA!
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 4,063
Lol I laughed about it when I realised, Ronnie and Kat preggers at the same time!

Reverse baby swap this time? Kat can do the swapping!
CUP OF TEAAA! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2014, 13:13
J-B
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Winter is coming.
Posts: 13,324
Seconds out, round 2!
J-B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2014, 13:26
Chris Mark
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Digital Spy init.
Posts: 4,677
Ronnie's seemed to be a sudden change of direction, so I would say no.

I would like to see Kat/Alfie a little anxious over it when they find out, though. It didn't make sense to me that they haven't mentioned Tommy's kidnapper being two doors away.
Yes, I've noticed that it's something that really bothers you.
Chris Mark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2014, 13:28
olivej
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 14,621
This is the second time both Kat and Ronnie are pregnant at the same time together.

Obviously their pregnancies don't tie in this time, as Kat will give birth quite some time before Ronnie does.

Is there a reason behind them doing this again? There obviously won't be anymore baby-swapping or cot deaths, but do you think the writers could have something else planned here?
no, I dont think so

maybe the writers are trying to give Ronnie a piece of happiness in her life and a baby is the way forward........
olivej is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2014, 13:42
rumpleteazer
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Milton Keynes
Posts: 5,185
If the babies were due a bit closer together they could have done a comedy scene where they both accidentally take the wrong kids from day care (or something similar) before realising about 5 minutes later
rumpleteazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2014, 13:43
Kim_x
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,444
Plus giving Ronnie a baby is probably the only way they can cut the apron strings between her and Roxy.
Kim_x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2014, 14:14
Ice Breaker
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 523
I didn't realise this at all.
Ice Breaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2014, 14:22
dullagj2
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: East Street
Posts: 10,153
I did wonder if its DTC trying to right another wrong like he did with Stacey confessing she killed Archie to the police.
dullagj2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2014, 14:30
Mr Moriarty
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 582
I'm gonna laugh my ass of if they do another baby swap
Mr Moriarty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2014, 14:37
CriticFan
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 978
I didn't realise this at all.
Same!!
CriticFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2014, 14:42
dazza89
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 13,401
Probably setting up a romance between the kids in 18 years time, Kat and Ronnie eating christmas dinner together while there kids are getting it on, Alfie will be dead, Roxy will still be living like a 18 year old and Kat's skirts wouldn't of got any shorter.
dazza89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2014, 15:18
RetroMusicFan
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Herr Flick's dungeon
Posts: 5,939
I think it's just coincidence, I doubt they would do another baby swap as it would be a boring repeat of a storyline that was a farce imo anyway!
RetroMusicFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2014, 16:30
NeutronstarNeko
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,839
I think there might be a little bit of prams at dawn but Kat and Ronnie are pretty much cool now and I think they will bond more with baby sitting going at some points.

I always thought Ronnie would die saving Roxy/Amy...sacrificing herself to save someone but now she has her own kid I dont think they will kill her off. She's bound to be super possessive and protective of this baby but surely she has to pay for Carl at some point?
NeutronstarNeko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2014, 16:52
Marcus_Smith
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 3,461
I did wonder if its DTC trying to right another wrong like he did with Stacey confessing she killed Archie to the police.
Think the same and Ronnie will probably actually have this baby this time.
Marcus_Smith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2014, 16:57
Harlowe
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14,370
I think DTC is trying to create as many future characters as possible to populate the show in future, 4 babies so far finger crossed nothing happens, how many more before he leaves, I reckon a few more could be on the cards.
Harlowe is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 13:08.