|
||||||||
EE - Is there a reason behind making Kat and Ronnie pregnant at the same time again? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,828
|
EE - Is there a reason behind making Kat and Ronnie pregnant at the same time again?
This is the second time both Kat and Ronnie are pregnant at the same time together.
Obviously their pregnancies don't tie in this time, as Kat will give birth quite some time before Ronnie does. Is there a reason behind them doing this again? There obviously won't be anymore baby-swapping or cot deaths, but do you think the writers could have something else planned here? |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 978
|
Kat and Ronnie could take their babys to nursery and thats when the swapping starts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,444
|
Ronnie's seemed to be a sudden change of direction, so I would say no.
I would like to see Kat/Alfie a little anxious over it when they find out, though. It didn't make sense to me that they haven't mentioned Tommy's kidnapper being two doors away. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Suck it
Posts: 7,777
|
Yes. Ronnie has lost her baby and is coming back for one of Kat's twins. The baby swap storyline was such a success the writers have decided to do it again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Hogwarts
Posts: 13,486
|
Kats gonna plot revenge and steal Ronnies kid this time
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 4,063
|
Lol I laughed about it when I realised, Ronnie and Kat preggers at the same time!
Reverse baby swap this time? Kat can do the swapping! |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Winter is coming.
Posts: 13,324
|
Seconds out, round 2!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Digital Spy init.
Posts: 4,677
|
Quote:
Ronnie's seemed to be a sudden change of direction, so I would say no.
I would like to see Kat/Alfie a little anxious over it when they find out, though. It didn't make sense to me that they haven't mentioned Tommy's kidnapper being two doors away.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 14,621
|
Quote:
This is the second time both Kat and Ronnie are pregnant at the same time together.
Obviously their pregnancies don't tie in this time, as Kat will give birth quite some time before Ronnie does. Is there a reason behind them doing this again? There obviously won't be anymore baby-swapping or cot deaths, but do you think the writers could have something else planned here? maybe the writers are trying to give Ronnie a piece of happiness in her life and a baby is the way forward........ |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Milton Keynes
Posts: 5,185
|
If the babies were due a bit closer together they could have done a comedy scene where they both accidentally take the wrong kids from day care (or something similar) before realising about 5 minutes later
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,444
|
Plus giving Ronnie a baby is probably the only way they can cut the apron strings between her and Roxy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 523
|
I didn't realise this at all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: East Street
Posts: 10,153
|
I did wonder if its DTC trying to right another wrong like he did with Stacey confessing she killed Archie to the police.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 582
|
I'm gonna laugh my ass of if they do another baby swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 978
|
Quote:
I didn't realise this at all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 13,401
|
Probably setting up a romance between the kids in 18 years time, Kat and Ronnie eating christmas dinner together while there kids are getting it on, Alfie will be dead, Roxy will still be living like a 18 year old and Kat's skirts wouldn't of got any shorter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Herr Flick's dungeon
Posts: 5,939
|
I think it's just coincidence, I doubt they would do another baby swap as it would be a boring repeat of a storyline that was a farce imo anyway!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,839
|
I think there might be a little bit of prams at dawn but Kat and Ronnie are pretty much cool now and I think they will bond more with baby sitting going at some points.
I always thought Ronnie would die saving Roxy/Amy...sacrificing herself to save someone but now she has her own kid I dont think they will kill her off. She's bound to be super possessive and protective of this baby but surely she has to pay for Carl at some point? |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 3,461
|
Quote:
I did wonder if its DTC trying to right another wrong like he did with Stacey confessing she killed Archie to the police.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14,370
|
I think DTC is trying to create as many future characters as possible to populate the show in future, 4 babies so far finger crossed nothing happens, how many more before he leaves, I reckon a few more could be on the cards.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:08.


