Originally Posted by _NiallDEE_:
“Just to reiterate what I said in the boardroom, past performance didn't come into it - it was based on the considerable amount of effort George put into this task, which is especially important in week 1 where we need to determine who's will be dedicated in the long term. If George had made considerably less of a contribution, he would have been fired. That's not to say that we're firing people based on activity - if someone does the most in a team but everything they complete is completely awful then they will most likely be fired, that's not the case for George as I feel the pitch (which was largely done by him) was to a very good standard and also I feel he held his own remarkably well when he had to answer a string of tough questions. Obviously he wasn't perfect, made some fatal mistakes as PM and was a lot more to blame for the failure of the task than Mitch was, but I think if you looked back on every task in DSA and determine who would have been fired if it was completely down to responsibility for the failure of the task then you'd have some pretty bad firings. One of the reasons I was said to have to fire Mitchell was because I was looking forward to see how he could improve on his previous performances, so that definitely wasn't the reason he was fired.”
Thanks for giving me another chance, Niall. Honestly, I would not have blamed you had you fired me, because I made some incredibly stupid mistakes on this task. I don't know how I went so badly wrong, but hopefully I can rectify this in subsequent tasks.