DS Forums

 
 

Semi Final: Brazil v Germany 08/04 9pm KO


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-07-2014, 13:54
henrywilliams58
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: London
Posts: 4,710
Even more amazing* is that all 7 goals were from open play. No corner, free-kick or penalty goals. And against 11 men rather than 10 or 9.


*Sorry if this has already bee pointed out
henrywilliams58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 09-07-2014, 14:01
Bosox
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: London
Posts: 10,702
The first goal came from a corner.
Bosox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2014, 14:06
Eurostar
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Dublin
Posts: 51,620
Even more amazing* is that all 7 goals were from open play. No corner, free-kick or penalty goals. And against 11 men rather than 10 or 9.


*Sorry if this has already bee pointed out
But check out the official match stats, they're a real eye opener : Brazil 8 shots on target to Germany's 10, Brazil 7 corners to Germany's 5 and Brazil 52% possession to Germany's 48%.

That tells us that Germany were in absolutely sensational form and delivered the most devastating performance.....Brazil may well have gotten a result against anyone else in the tournament or lost only narrowly at worst.
Eurostar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2014, 14:33
fruitloop27
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: London- I come in peace :D
Posts: 2,641
Originally Posted by BigFoot87;73604674[B
]I look at Messi and, I wonder: If he was injured, would the Argentina fans be holding up his shirt while the national anthems were played?

No player is bigger than the team. No-one. But I have to agree with what others have said, you'd thought that Neymar was dead instead of injured. [/b]We're they more concerned about Neymar then the record-breaking German team assembled against them tonight? It seemed like it.

When a team relies on one player that much, adores one player that much....well, you're asking for trouble. And Brazil got it tonight in spades.

Too much Neymar.

Too much emotion.

Too many tears.

Too much pressure.

Tonight Brazil imploded. And I didn't feel any sympathy for them. That begun to evaporate from me after they kicked Columbia (and James Rodriguez in particular) off the pitch and then had the nerve to moan about Neymar being hunted. The Neymar shirt tribute was the final straw for me.

Good job, Germany. Good job.

Very well said. I thought that whole charade was pathetic. David Luiz was the stand-in captain & you'd have thought he was another disciple in the church of Neymar.
fruitloop27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2014, 14:39
Xela M
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,578
Well, clearly they are nothing without Neymar. No wonder the nation adores him. I don't believe Argentina would get to the semi finals without Messi, but I'm pretty sure they wouldn't lose 1:7 to any team.
Xela M is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2014, 14:51
O'Neill
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 8,639
I remember watching them, including Messi, lose 6-1 to Bolivia, probably as close as it'll get.
O'Neill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2014, 14:53
carnivalist
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,412
But check out the official match stats, they're a real eye opener : Brazil 8 shots on target to Germany's 10, Brazil 7 corners to Germany's 5 and Brazil 52% possession to Germany's 48%.

That tells us that Germany were in absolutely sensational form and delivered the most devastating performance.....Brazil may well have gotten a result against anyone else in the tournament or lost only narrowly at worst.
No it doesn't - rather it demonstrates that football statistics have to be carefully taken in context. Here's an example of misleading statistics.

Side A produces 20 pathetic shots from the half-way line that dribble towards the goal at one mile an hour. They have totally ineffectual possession back and forth across their back four for 60% of the game before regularly losing the ball whenever they venture into attacking areas (are you England in disguise).

Side B sits back, keeps a perfect defensive shape, waits for side A to give up possession - or else their sitting midfielders win the ball whenever side A moves within touching distance of thier 18-yard line. They then control midfield with rat-a-tat one-touch possession and scythe through side A's defense with alarming regularity. They have 10 shots on goal including some howitzers from 20 yards out that rattle the woodwork.

Side B wins 5-0 but side A have far better statistics.

Statistics can be very useful but you have to analyse them carefully. I saw some people earlier in the thread make a similar point to yours about Brazil's shots on target. However if you look at the game again, a number of those were largely hopeful shots that would never have beaten a keeper like Neuer in a million years.
carnivalist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2014, 14:57
Xela M
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,578
No it doesn't - rather it demonstrates that football statistics have to be carefully taken in context. Here's an example of misleading statistics.

Side A produces 20 pathetic shots from the half-way line that dribble towards the goal at one mile an hour. They have totally ineffectual possession back and forth across their back four for 60% of the game before regularly losing the ball whenver they venture into attacking areas (are you England in disguise).

Side B sits back, keeps a perfect defensive shape, waits for side A to give up possession - or else their sitting midfielders win the ball whenever side A moves within touching distance of thier 18-yard line. They then control midfield with rat-a-tat one-touch possession and scythe through side A's defense with alarming regularity. They have 10 shots on goal including some howitzers from 20 yards out that rattle the woodwork.

Side B wins 5-0 but side A have far better statistics.

Statistics can be very useful but you have to analyse them carefully. I saw some people earlier in the thread make a similar point to yours about Brazil's shots on target. However if you look at the game again, a number of those were largely hopeful shots that would never have beaten a keeper like Neuer in a million years.
This exactly, except Side B won 7-1
Xela M is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2014, 15:02
carnivalist
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,412
I bet Piers Morgan is feeling like a bit of a t*** right now

Piers Morgan ‏@piersmorgan 3h

David Luiz will drive Brazil to victory tonight. He's been my star of this World Cup. Such passion/commitment/determination.
Piers Morgan should permanently feel like a t***.
Piers Morgan should permanently feel like a part of the female anatomy about two feet south of a t**
carnivalist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2014, 15:15
Eurostar
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Dublin
Posts: 51,620
No it doesn't - rather it demonstrates that football statistics have to be carefully taken in context. Here's an example of misleading statistics.

Side A produces 20 pathetic shots from the half-way line that dribble towards the goal at one mile an hour. They have totally ineffectual possession back and forth across their back four for 60% of the game before regularly losing the ball whenever they venture into attacking areas (are you England in disguise).

Side B sits back, keeps a perfect defensive shape, waits for side A to give up possession - or else their sitting midfielders win the ball whenever side A moves within touching distance of thier 18-yard line. They then control midfield with rat-a-tat one-touch possession and scythe through side A's defense with alarming regularity. They have 10 shots on goal including some howitzers from 20 yards out that rattle the woodwork.

Side B wins 5-0 but side A have far better statistics.

Statistics can be very useful but you have to analyse them carefully. I saw some people earlier in the thread make a similar point to yours about Brazil's shots on target. However if you look at the game again, a number of those were largely hopeful shots that would never have beaten a keeper like Neuer in a million years.
Certainly but Germany's 10 shots on target resulting in seven goals is extremely telling. They actually did not 'dominate' the game as such to any great degree, but delivered the most lethal and clinical of finishing. But that still doesn't mean the result was a fluke, I think the Germans were sensationally good.

People are suggesting that Brazil were abysmal beyond belief but I've a feeling an identical performance against any other team in the tournament would not have resulted in a 7-1 defeat or anything close to it.....in fact I don't think they were too far below where they were against Chile and Colombia (which was not great for starters).
Eurostar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2014, 19:45
henrywilliams58
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: London
Posts: 4,710
Dear Mr Abramovich,

Can we have our money back please.

Regards,

Laurent Robert Blanc,
Manager, Paris Saint-Germain F.C.
Might / should make no difference to his performance for PSG. After all Rooney, Gerrard, Lampard et al are shit for England and yet they perform for their clubs.
henrywilliams58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2014, 23:18
The Turk
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,084
Christian Machowski ‏@Christian_ESEM
The only three national teams ever to concede five goals in one half during the World Cup Finals:
Zaire
Haiti
Brazil
via @History_Futbol

Just preposterous.
Didn't El Salvador once lose 10-1 to Hungary in the '82' world cup? For that to have happened would've required El Salvador to concede at least five goals in at least one half of that match, in which case they should be added to that list above too.

Last edited by The Turk : 09-07-2014 at 23:41. Reason: Realised I meant the 1982 world cup
The Turk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2014, 23:24
degsyhufc
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Up North
Posts: 58,791
Didn't El Salvador once lost 10-1 to Hungary in one of the 70s world cups? For that to have happened would've required El Salvador to concede at least five goals in at least one half of that match, in which case they should be added to that list above too.
Only 3 scored in the first half. I wonder if the tweet meant first half?
degsyhufc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2014, 23:47
The Turk
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,084
Only 3 scored in the first half. I wonder if the tweet meant first half?
You're probably right about that. I have to admit I did wonder myself if that's what the tweet meant.
The Turk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2014, 00:27
dreadnought
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,071
This is brilliant
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RLZUKqpXYzU
dreadnought is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2014, 11:33
bri160356
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Made it Ma, Top of the World!
Posts: 4,002
Might / should make no difference to his performance for PSG. After all Rooney, Gerrard, Lampard et al are shit for England and yet they perform for their clubs.
Fair point, however, 50 Million Euros........what were they thinking.

Maybe PSG could have Chelsea under the ‘Distance Selling Regulations’.
bri160356 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2014, 04:19
Xela M
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,578
Could be quite dramatic if Brazil are losing by more than 1 goal at any point. If brazil lose there is a serious possibility this may be the last game of tournament if serious riots break out and safety is threatened. We could hear riot noises for example or have a pitch invasion and see protestors behind the windows of the studios and perhaps even the studio be evacuated or worse.
So what happened to the riots? Brazil lost 7:1 and Argentina are in the final. Yet, no games have been cancelled.. and... no riots!
Xela M is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2014, 12:17
Mandark
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Derby
Posts: 27,584
But check out the official match stats, they're a real eye opener : Brazil 8 shots on target to Germany's 10, Brazil 7 corners to Germany's 5 and Brazil 52% possession to Germany's 48%.

That tells us that Germany were in absolutely sensational form and delivered the most devastating performance.....Brazil may well have gotten a result against anyone else in the tournament or lost only narrowly at worst.
Yes, I've rewatched the MOTD highlights and Brazil had some really good chances but unfortunately were shooting like England. If they'd been more accurate (or Neuer not so good) then they should have had about four goals. Ramires made a huge difference to their attacking play when he came on and they looked far more dangerous in attack. Shocking that there was no room for him yet Fred and Hulk both started. If Brazil had scored one of those early chances, the Germans might have eased off their attack earlier and the shoreline probably wouldn't have been so bad.

With the defence though, I guess nothing could have shored that up without Silva unless they just got 8 or 9 behind the ball at all times.
Mandark is online now Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:13.