|
||||||||
Is it time for a new Hollyoaks producer? |
| View Poll Results: Is it time for a new producer to take over Hollyoaks? | |||
| Yes |
|
45 | 84.91% |
| No - keep Bryan Kirkwood in Hollyoaks |
|
8 | 15.09% |
| Voters: 53. You can't vote on this poll right now - are you signed in? | |||
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 871
|
Is it time for a new Hollyoaks producer?
I used to love Bryan Kirkwood's era in Hollyoaks in 2006-2009. But since he returned to the show in 2013, I stopped being a regular viewer. I still occassionally watch Hollyoaks but I don't find the storylines interesting now. Brayan Kirkwood seems obsessed with stunts/explosions and he has ruined some popular characters.
Do you think we need a new Hollyoaks producer? It's like BK wanted to wipe out everything that happened in 2010 onwards. Thoughts?
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 1,311
|
I think there needs to be TWO producers.
One to handle the pace of plots like the rape, domestics abuse, body plot with Jason Roscoe, Darren Osbourne's heart problems and the transgender stories. While handling character development solely on their characteristics and not the next big story. While the current producer does the stunts but makes us care about why they are happening with a much slower pace and mourning period! |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 36,654
|
Definitely. The show's never been as bad as it is now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 5,017
|
Yes...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: With MyAndy!
Posts: 15,179
|
no! they just won best soap! I don't think that he needs to go . I love hollyoaks there hasn't been a stunt or explision for a month or two.
think there was so many in such a short space cos he needed to clear out the past to get it back on track and better in future. they won the soap award for best soap so it appears to be working. cant't see him being sacked anytime soon |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,071
|
well if the show is so bad at the moment then why did it win best soap? I agree that its not at its best recently but obviously someone does
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,108
|
The show has gone beyond help.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 6,862
|
I think being at EE taught Bryan how to produce a rubbish soap.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 36,654
|
Quote:
The show has gone beyond help.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 6,862
|
Quote:
I think it can always be salvaged. It was really bad when Lucy Allan was in charge, and when Emma Smithwick made the teens the focus, but it turned around. They just need to take their time with plots, axe a lot of the people who can't act (most of the cast...), get some good new actors and stop with the sensationalism and stunts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 36,654
|
Quote:
But if they can't measure their success by winning a soap award for the first time ever and ratings increasing, how can they?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 39,614
|
Quote:
I think it can always be salvaged. It was really bad when Lucy Allan was in charge, and when Emma Smithwick made the teens the focus, but it turned around. They just need to take their time with plots, axe a lot of the people who can't act (most of the cast...), get some good new actors and stop with the sensationalism and stunts.
Anyway, it's academic. I don't believe Bryan Kirkwood will go anywhere, and nothing will change. It's a shame. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 36,654
|
Quote:
I don't know actually Ready. Sure, it was rubbish in the Allan and Smithwick eras, but they still had loads of good, likeable characters back then. That's why people cared, and chatted about the show on here passionately - they were frustrated that great characters were being wasted and they wanted to see that changed. Now, what's left? Who hasn't been completely trashed? Maybe Ste and Tony? Not much to rebuild a show around.
Anyway, it's academic. I don't believe Bryan Kirkwood will go anywhere, and nothing will change. It's a shame. I'm just praying that BK will decide he wants to ruin Emmerdale as well (sorry Emmerdale.) |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,699
|
Quote:
well if the show is so bad at the moment then why did it win best soap? I agree that its not at its best recently but obviously someone does
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,699
|
Quote:
I agree - even during those times I still enjoyed the show because of certain elements. I just mean that I don't think the show's ever beyond repair. Look at what PM did - he cast Rachel Shenton, Emmett Scanlan, Bronagh Waugh and Karen Hassan and they all became massively popular. It might take a lot of time to turn the show around, but I think it can be done.
I'm just praying that BK will decide he wants to ruin Emmerdale as well (sorry Emmerdale.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 6,862
|
Quote:
I don't know actually Ready. Sure, it was rubbish in the Allan and Smithwick eras, but they still had loads of good, likeable characters back then. That's why people cared, and chatted about the show on here passionately - they were frustrated that great characters were being wasted and they wanted to see that changed. Now, what's left? Who hasn't been completely trashed? Maybe Ste and Tony? Not much to rebuild a show around.
Anyway, it's academic. I don't believe Bryan Kirkwood will go anywhere, and nothing will change. It's a shame. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 36,654
|
Quote:
Emmerdale already had Stuart Blackburn try to destroy it. It has suffered enough
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,424
|
I do enjoy certain aspects of BK's current era. Blessing's storyline has been handled really well so far and I've enjoy most of the rape storyline (I think they went too far when Finn swapped the notes at court) and Katy's health problems/death was brilliantly told. I also think that the Maxine's domestic violence story and the bipolar plot with Cindy are really well acted and shown.
However, there are then stories and characters such as Grace and Trevor who, for me, bring the show down as I don't really care for them. If it had been Clare and Trevor I would have cared more as Clare was a brilliant character. I wanted to see more of her with Fraser and think his murder storyline would be much more interesting if Clare was involved. For me, BK really needs to concentrate on making the audience have an emotional connection with characters and stories. This is something Emma Smithwick said was key to the show and she was/is right! For example, the Blast was poor as I didn't care about the characters who died and felt no emotional connection, while Jim's death did not affect me as, by that time, if been desensitised to death. Furthermore, as I'm not invested in the characters as much as I used to be, the 'shocks' the writers and producers keep throwing at us aren't as good as those that ES gave us. BK should also focus on aftermath or then there's no point in telling the stories. However I feel that he believes that he has a winning formula so he'll probably never change. Therefore, maybe a new producer who understood this might be better. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 39,614
|
Quote:
I'm just praying that BK will decide he wants to ruin Emmerdale as well (sorry Emmerdale.) I love it far too much to have him anywhere near it. Anyway, after the EE disaster, I honestly can't see anyone else letting him ru(i)n a show. Which is bad news for HO, but excellent news for Dalers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 36,654
|
Quote:
He can stay the hell away from Emmerdale, thanks.
I love it far too much to have him anywhere near it. Anyway, after the EE disaster, I honestly can't see anyone else letting him ru(i)n a show. Which is bad news for HO, but excellent news for Dalers. ![]() ![]() I'm surprised a soap even hired him again after EE. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 39,614
|
Quote:
Maybe he can try his luck at medical dramas - Holby City? There's a lot of destruction and death. He'll fit right in
![]() I'm surprised a soap even hired him again after EE. ![]() ![]() ![]() eta: I'm now imagining the hospital overrun with shit gangsters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 36,654
|
Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() eta: I'm now imagining the hospital overrun with shit gangsters. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: The Dog In The Pond
Posts: 2,001
|
Quote:
I agree - even during those times I still enjoyed the show because of certain elements. I just mean that I don't think the show's ever beyond repair. Look at what PM did - he cast Rachel Shenton, Emmett Scanlan, Bronagh Waugh and Karen Hassan and they all became massively popular. It might take a lot of time to turn the show around, but I think it can be done.
I'm just praying that BK will decide he wants to ruin Emmerdale as well (sorry Emmerdale.) |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 36,654
|
Quote:
Cheryl was on the show long before PM, Karen was also originally cast in 2008 but it was obviously PM's decision to bring her back
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,547
|
I watch the show on rare occasions, but to me it's now beyond repair, it's just been horrendous for so long now. The last time I actually enjoyed it was during Esther's bullying, and even THAT had a terrible ending
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 20:46.



I love it far too much to have him anywhere near it. 

