|
||||||||
Just like Branning mania its now Carter mania |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 569
|
Just like Branning mania its now Carter mania
Go back to the Newman era it was all about the Brannings you couldn't get away from them. Now all off a sudden its the same with the Carters there everywhere there getting the main story the Boss has said more Carters could be coming in. Surley its going a bit to far now. I cant even take Shirley as Micks mum seriously I mean really.
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 112
|
A big family has always been at the centre of EE.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 125,435
|
With the Brannings there was no warmth though. From the start we knew Max was unfaithful.
With the Carters, there is genuine love there. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Albert Square
Posts: 10,674
|
They own the Queen Vic, of course they will be featured more!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7,652
|
I find the Carter's alot more interesting than the Brannings
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 7,261
|
Quote:
I find the Carter's alot more interesting than the Brannings
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 11,622
|
The Carters are no more featured than the likes of the Butchers, Mitchells and the Beales. The difference is that their family dynamic is fresh, memorable and easy to engage with, and therefore people are remembering them more.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 69,012
|
Quote:
Go back to the Newman era it was all about the Brannings you couldn't get away from them. Now all off a sudden its the same with the Carters there everywhere there getting the main story the Boss has said more Carters could be coming in. Surley its going a bit to far now. I cant even take Shirley as Micks mum seriously I mean really.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 3,461
|
Swear people on here never happy a few months back we had a break from them for over a month and people who complained they where sick the carters where the same ones that ended up moaning how they where then missing the carters 😂
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,768
|
The Branning's never felt like a family. Only when Max and Carol team up do they become a realistic unit.
The Carters actually do their best to get along with each other and have a laugh. They make the show worth watching. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Albert Square.
Posts: 46,296
|
I hope we have alot more Carters screen time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 112
|
Quote:
The Carters are no more featured than the likes of the Butchers, Mitchells and the Beales. The difference is that their family dynamic is fresh, memorable and easy to engage with, and therefore people are remembering them more.
It's not surprising as you either bring a family in BIG or you face them falling to the background too quickly, but they have definitely featured more. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: South Coast
Posts: 16,045
|
Quote:
Go back to the Newman era it was all about the Brannings you couldn't get away from them. Now all off a sudden its the same with the Carters there everywhere there getting the main story the Boss has said more Carters could be coming in. Surley its going a bit to far now. I cant even take Shirley as Micks mum seriously I mean really.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 31,192
|
Quote:
Storyline wise they are far more featured, In the short time they've been there they've had what, 7~8 different storylines.
It's not surprising as you either bring a family in BIG or you face them falling to the background too quickly, but they have definitely featured more. |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 31,192
|
The thing with the Brannings is that they were shorehorned into every storyline that doesn't even concern them. Derek Branning for instance was everywhere and it seemed he had to pop up in every scene.
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 7,824
|
Pretty sure the Brannings dominated more than just the Newman era.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 36,061
|
The thing I appreciate about the Carters "domination" is they aren't just shoehorned into the middle of other peoples storylines, like the Branning's used to be. I know Linda is a friend (is she?) of Sharon's so she does share some screentime with her and MIck has recently become friendly with Ian but they don't take over which I felt the Branning's always did. If there was a new character on the show it felt like Jack would impreginate them, Max would have an affair with them and Tanya would bitch about them etc
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Suck it
Posts: 7,777
|
It is Carter mania right now but there's a very big difference between this and the Branning era. The Carters are actually likable characters for the most part. I'm not complaining yet since it's their first year and they're in The Vic but next year they should take a backseat. With that said, Tina has been a flop and should be axed with immediate effect along with Tosh and Big Mo rip off Aunt Babe.
I'm not going to start a Shirley rant but she needs to be taken out of that dynamic once her storyline with Mick is out in the open. The Carters work better when she's not around. My immediate reaction to her return at the end of Monday's episode was dread at having to deal with her messed up issues again. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Wiltshire
Posts: 5,203
|
I must say that I miss Jacqueline Jossa in EE. I imagine she will look even more sexier when she is back
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: London
Posts: 9,412
|
The big difference is that the Brannings were vile, hypocritical, unfaithful, lying, cheating scumbags. And they were *literally* everywhere, involved in every storyline - even Pat's death became about Tanya.
The Carters on the other hand are likeable are have a genuine warmth about them (Shirley excluded). They're getting a lot of screen time, but then they are the owners of the Vic, which is the focal point of the show. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 14,621
|
Quote:
Go back to the Newman era it was all about the Brannings you couldn't get away from them. Now all off a sudden its the same with the Carters there everywhere there getting the main story the Boss has said more Carters could be coming in. Surley its going a bit to far now. I cant even take Shirley as Micks mum seriously I mean really.
I appreciate they are a "new" family but for goodness sake - there are plenty of other characters DTC can use When was the last time we saw Dot? or Sharon for that matter, Lucy has been brutally murdered but when was the last time we had any new info on that? |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: bournemouth
Posts: 65,124
|
Quote:
I know, boring isnt it - every single SL has a flipping Carter in it, every single scene has a flipping Carter in it - mega yawn!
I appreciate they are a "new" family but for goodness sake - there are plenty of other characters DTC can use When was the last time we saw Dot? or Sharon for that matter, Lucy has been brutally murdered but when was the last time we had any new info on that? |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 9,495
|
Quote:
It is Carter mania right now but there's a very big difference between this and the Branning era. The Carters are actually likable characters for the most part. I'm not complaining yet since it's their first year and they're in The Vic but next year they should take a backseat. With that said, Tina has been a flop and should be axed with immediate effect along with Tosh and Big Mo rip off Aunt Babe.
I'm not going to start a Shirley rant but she needs to be taken out of that dynamic once her storyline with Mick is out in the open. The Carters work better when she's not around. My immediate reaction to her return at the end of Monday's episode was dread at having to deal with her messed up issues again. Anyway back on topic, I don't think the Carters are like the Brannings at all, they are in the Vic, the center of the show so it's natural that they will interact with a wide range of characters and they are much more likeable and real than the Brannings imo. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Suck it
Posts: 7,777
|
Quote:
^ I disagree, I like Shirley's relationship with all of the Carters and she is very much a part of the family, her and Stan are very much alike which is interesting, I like her and Mick's close relationship and I'd like to see more of Aunt Babe and Shirley..
What are you disagreeing with? My sense of dread at having to deal with Shirley in the Carter family? There's not much you can do to change that, I'm afraid
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 9,495
|
Quote:
She doesn't have a close relationship with Mick. She didn't see him for 15 years.
What are you disagreeing with? My sense of dread at having to deal with Shirley in the Carter family? There's not much you can do to change that, I'm afraid ![]() I disagree that the Carters work 'better' without her around, I think they work well both ways, I like the dynamic Shirley adds, sort of the outsider of the family, alongside Stan and Dean, it really showed the other night when they were all singing and laughing and it panned to the darkness between Shirley/Dean, but still had a shot of Mick/Shirley's lighter relationship when they were smiling at one another during the song. I can really see a sibling rivalry between Mick/Dean heating up eventually. I'd like to see Dean, Shirley, George (I'd like him back full time) and Andy (if he is cast) to become a family unit on the square and then Mick, Linda, Nancy, Johnny and Lee as a family unit...if that makes sense? |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:26.



