• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • Entertainment
  • Football
  • European Championship 2016
BBC or ITV for final
<<
<
5 of 5
>>
>
Lateralthinking
13-07-2014
Both.

Congratulations to BBC TV and ITV.

The coverage has been excellent throughout the tournament.
Lateralthinking
13-07-2014
.....The standard of commentating is not quite back to that of the classic era but it is getting there. I thought ITV edged it. They also won in the battle of the co-commentators. The panels were equally good and so too the artier audio/visual aspects from Ary Barroso's "Aquilera de Brasil" which of course marked the start of samba in 1939 to Stevie Wonder's Song in the Key of Life from 1976, "Another Star". A special mention to Tim Vickery who hot on the heels of that excellent 5 Live spot was a big plus for the BBC and Henry reading Baudelaire was a very, very special moment. Happy is he who can with a vigorous wing propel towards the luminous and serene realms. Cheers.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QFWHAnVudZI
Goodwin
14-07-2014
I suspect this will be Lawrenson's last world cup final as a co-commentator. Or even his last world cup, period. Getting a bit long in the tooth. Time to freshen things up a bit.
Oliver_Tomlinso
14-07-2014
Averages:
BBC: 12.09 million
ITV: 2.86 million

Peaks:
BBC: 16.72 million
ITV: 3.96 million
celesti
14-07-2014
Originally Posted by Goodwin:
“I suspect this will be Lawrenson's last world cup final as a co-commentator. Or even his last world cup, period. Getting a bit long in the tooth. Time to freshen things up a bit.”

He seems almost annoyed by football at the best of times, but particularly in this tournament most of his time was spent whining about players falling over and calling them all girls. It's like a slow nervous breakdown.
mgvsmith
14-07-2014
Originally Posted by bluefb:
“BBC currently listing the line-ups, ITV currently showing ads. 'Nuff said.”

The adverts seem to make all the difference especially when you look at the viewing figures.

Originally Posted by Dandem:
“Lawro is the most mediocre for me. Better than Robbie Savage and Phil Neville. Not as good as Danny Murphy or Martin Keown.”

I absolutely agree with that. I actually like Martin Keown's voice, he would make a good DJ!

Originally Posted by pixel_pixel:
“
Hansen and Lawrenson ruin BBC's coverage for me.”

Everton supporter ? (I am)

Originally Posted by Goodwin:
“I suspect this will be Lawrenson's last world cup final as a co-commentator. Or even his last world cup, period. Getting a bit long in the tooth. Time to freshen things up a bit.”

Despite his whining I think I would miss him. I hope he gives it a few more years.

Rio was the revelation on the Beeb and I liked Ian Wright and Lee Dixon on ITV.
Goodwin
14-07-2014
Originally Posted by celesti:
“He seems almost annoyed by football at the best of times, but particularly in this tournament most of his time was spent whining about players falling over and calling them all girls. It's like a slow nervous breakdown.”

It's a bit like listening to a bloke standing next to you in a pub when a match is on. He's very much old school and way back when he started as a pundit, then what he said was maybe relevant but he's a like a broken record now.
Syntax Error
14-07-2014
Originally Posted by Oliver_Tomlinso:
“Averages:
BBC: 12.09 million
ITV: 2.86 million

Peaks:
BBC: 16.72 million
ITV: 3.96 million”

Standard procedure.

ITV always get trounced in the WC Final ratings because people naturally gravitate towards the BBC in such instances.

A lot of people complain about adverts & the like, but they don't affect the actual match time, so I just don't see the problem; plus there just seems to be a cliched narrative that ITV's coverage is 'rubbish' & BBC's is the best ever, despite the fact there probably is little or no difference in it.

I watched it on ITV, as I preferred their line-up of pundits & their commentators too, but I'm in an obvious minority.
DangerBrother
14-07-2014
Originally Posted by Syntax Error:
“Standard procedure.

ITV always get trounced in the WC Final ratings because people naturally gravitate towards the BBC in such instances.

A lot of people complain about adverts & the like, but they don't affect the actual match time, so I just don't see the problem; plus there just seems to be a cliched narrative that ITV's coverage is 'rubbish' & BBC's is the best ever, despite the fact there probably is little or no difference in it.

I watched it on ITV, as I preferred their line-up of pundits & their commentators too, but I'm in an obvious minority.”

i think alot of folk would have watched BBC live, but record or catchup with the ITV punditry, etc.

i am just doing that now, Itv pundits are much more fun, with Oneil and Wright making me laugh a number of times, and I still think Hoddle show be England manager, very good thinker.
<<
<
5 of 5
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map