• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Soaps
EE: Has there been an explanation as to why Shirley walked out on Dean and Carly?
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
Ell_Ren
11-07-2014
Originally Posted by kitkat1971:
“I think it was me that mentioned the memory thing. Of course everybody is different and when I said most people memories start at about 3 or 4 I didn't mean clearly or for everything - generally more unusual events stick in he mind. For example I remember being in a 'show' at nursery school, us moving house and getting a new dog which happened within a couple of weeks of each other when I was 4, my first day at infants school and being the only kid left there at lunch due to my mother working on the other side of town and not being able to take me home like the other kids. One of my grandfather's died when I was 6 and I remember being told in excruciating detail although my memories of him alive are very vague. It's more just a feeling, a sense, image of him I have in my memories now but there is something.

I couldn't quote specific scenes but I do remember it being made very clear back in 2007/2008 that Shirley was supposed to have left Kevin and the kids when they were very young - Dean only a baby and Carly old enough to vaguely remember her but now well so maybe 3 or 4. It can be argued that most viewers won't remember the details so it doesn't matter that they've changed it to enable them to introduce her family and re-introduce Dean but it is certainly a retcon just as Max and Jack Branning being the youngest members of the family was - it's just that most people probably won't care about it much as they would retconning something like Kathy, Cindy or Angie's deaths.”

Bib: I wasn't meaning anything by it, I know you were just saying in your experience.
Of course I remember instances and certain things I remember vaguely but faces aren't always easy to picture after years of not seeing them, esp if there is no photos to look at, if that makes sense?

Bib2: I agree with that, I just think that although it was alluded too and mentioned sporadically, it was never said 100% so I don't think it is a big deal if Dean is made slightly older to accommodate what is happening now, as retcons go, it isn't exactly a biggie.

Originally Posted by Broken_Arrow:
“You can place whatever emphasis you want on it but the storyline in 2006/2007 stated very clearly that Shirley had not been in Dean's life since he was a baby and therefore he did not recognise her. It was a continual part of the narrative the whole time they were on the show together. Kevin and Shirley divorced in 1989 and he never saw her again until December 2006. It was written in stone and has now been changed.

Shirley did not leave in the 90's. She left in 1989 when Dean was a baby. Anything written in recent months contradicting that is a retcon and is the continuity we're expected to follow now. Shirley 2014 left her entire family minus Tina 15 years ago. Shirley 2006 left her entire family (which didn't include the new Carters at the time) in 1989.

Regarding the memory thing, perhaps you just have a bad memory. A lot of people do. It's not for me to tell you what you should and shouldn't remember but I can remember from the age of 4-5 very well. I can't conceive of not remembering important stuff from the ages of 7 to 9 but that's just me.”

bib: I just meant that it was 7 years ago and I so I don't see many viewers sitting at the TV saying, well 7 years ago, Shirley left shortly after that video was recorded, not many people think they way, well casual viewers anyway. I don't think it was written in stone, it was alluded too, but never categorically stated, so they can juggle it about a bit without it being a disaster, I remember her leaving when Dean was young, but young doesn't necessarily mean baby. - must be my 'Bad Memory' letting me down again...

With regards to memories all I was trying to say is that everyone's memories of things are different, some people remember before others and some remember later on, a lot of people refer to the quote about childhood being like being drunk, everyone else remembers it but you!
Brookside
11-07-2014
Glad to see my post was highly regarded x
kitkat1971
12-07-2014
Hard to quote for some reason.

Eli_Ren
I think i'd agree that it would be hard to remember faces even from as old as 6 or 7 - I can't really bring my Grandad that died when I was that age to mind but I do almost have a 'sense' memory of him - feel, smell, image and I think that would remain for your mother if you met them again as an adult if they'd left anything after the first couple of years - even if you don't know their face. It was made very clear in 2007/2008 that there was nothing for Dean re remembering Shirley so he has to have been very, very young.

I'm not a child psych but I'm fairly sure that 4 or 5 (basically starting school) is the 'standard', age that most people start having memories firm enough to last into adulthood though of course it isn't total recall but then most adults don't have total recall for everything they did last week! You tend to block out the mundane, boring stuff like your commute to work, even most of your time at work!

I agree that most casual viewers probably wouldn't remember the details and personally I feel that shows should not become slaves to their own continuity to the extent that they don't run a good storyline because it contradicts one throwaway comment from a decade before. The Carters are a good family (though they could have been just as good without the Shirley connection) and I'm glad Dean is back so them retconning is probably worth it in the greater scheme of things. But for pedants (of which I am one) that do have very good memories for what has happened in the history of soaps (of which I am also one) them changing established history (even if it was only a couple of lines) is very annoying as whilst you can as I say argue that it doesn't matter as most don't remember, you can also argue it is insulting the intelligence of those audience members that do remember. And really, 7 years is not that long ago - at least not to somebody like me that has watched 29 years of it and remembers most of it very well.
kitkat1971
12-07-2014
@ Brookside.

Your post was fine - I agreed with most of it. I just only tend to reply if I feel I have something constructive to add or argue with a specific post.
Ell_Ren
12-07-2014
Originally Posted by kitkat1971:
“Hard to quote for some reason.

Eli_Ren
I think i'd agree that it would be hard to remember faces even from as old as 6 or 7 - I can't really bring my Grandad that died when I was that age to mind but I do almost have a 'sense' memory of him - feel, smell, image and I think that would remain for your mother if you met them again as an adult if they'd left anything after the first couple of years - even if you don't know their face. It was made very clear in 2007/2008 that there was nothing for Dean re remembering Shirley so he has to have been very, very young.

I'm not a child psych but I'm fairly sure that 4 or 5 (basically starting school) is the 'standard', age that most people start having memories firm enough to last into adulthood though of course it isn't total recall but then most adults don't have total recall for everything they did last week! You tend to block out the mundane, boring stuff like your commute to work, even most of your time at work!

I agree that most casual viewers probably wouldn't remember the details and personally I feel that shows should not become slaves to their own continuity to the extent that they don't run a good storyline because it contradicts one throwaway comment from a decade before. The Carters are a good family (though they could have been just as good without the Shirley connection) and I'm glad Dean is back so them retconning is probably worth it in the greater scheme of things. But for pedants (of which I am one) that do have very good memories for what has happened in the history of soaps (of which I am also one) them changing established history (even if it was only a couple of lines) is very annoying as whilst you can as I say argue that it doesn't matter as most don't remember, you can also argue it is insulting the intelligence of those audience members that do remember. And really, 7 years is not that long ago - at least not to somebody like me that has watched 29 years of it and remembers most of it very well.”

Bib: Basically that is what I was trying to say, you have worded it much better though! I completely understand where you are coming from, I guess, from my point of view, I just think that it's not a huge deal in the whole scheme of things, If it was a huge retcon like...bringing Den back from the dead again or an implausible/ridiculous story, like Stacey's return/Janine's exit then I'd tend to feel the same way but I do see where you are coming from.
james_killroy
12-07-2014
Eastenders haven't retconned anything.

One episode before Shirley said she walked out on her family 15 years ago, Dean confirmed he left Kevin when she was a baby. This was stated on screen. EE arent going to make a massive continuity error in the space of 2 episodes.

The fire at Mick's pub happened 15 years ago.

When Phil was telling Shirley she needed to make things right with her son. It was Mick she went running to not Dean.

So while confusing Shirley was talking about walking out on her son Mick 15 years ago NOT Dean and Carly. She had already walked away from them prior.

They could have made it more clear but the actual Mick twist hadn't been revealed at that point so its easy to see why people got mixed up with the facts however now in hindsight its clear to see what she was referring to.


The only actual retcon, if you can call it that, is Dean's sudden bitterness. Carly was the one who had a problem with Shirley, Dean was fine with Shirley until his return from prison but Shirley had nothing to do with the fact he ended up in jail. I agree Dea has always had questionable motives, like drugging Stacey so he could have sex with her, but other than that he was never messed up the way he is now.
Ell_Ren
12-07-2014
Originally Posted by james_killroy:
“Eastenders haven't retconned anything.

One episode before Shirley said she walked out on her family 15 years ago, Dean confirmed he left Kevin when she was a baby. This was stated on screen. EE arent going to make a massive continuity error in the space of 2 episodes.

The fire at Mick's pub happened 15 years ago.

When Phil was telling Shirley she needed to make things right with her son. It was Mick she went running to not Dean.

So while confusing Shirley was talking about walking out on her son Mick 15 years ago NOT Dean and Carly. She had already walked away from them prior.

They could have made it more clear but the actual Mick twist hadn't been revealed at that point so its easy to see why people got mixed up with the facts however now in hindsight its clear to see what she was referring to.


The only actual retcon, if you can call it that, is Dean's sudden bitterness. Carly was the one who had a problem with Shirley, Dean was fine with Shirley until his return from prison but Shirley had nothing to do with the fact he ended up in jail. I agree Dean has always had questionable motives, like drugging Stacey so he could have sex with her, but other than that he was never messed up the way he is now.”

This has confused me, Dean was clearly angry when he came out of prison, but why at Shirley? His mum was actually the last person he called before he was taken away and they had a good relationship before he went to prison. Deans motives have been questionable in the past but he is suddenly referring to having a rubbish childhood and brooding about it in every scene, he had Kevin and Carly and in his first stint he was well adjusted...well to an extent. He was brought up with a family who loved him, albeit minus his mum being there, but I don't know where this whole bitterness has come from.
At least Shirley came back to find the kids and sort it out, IRL that doesn't always happen. I'm interested to find out 1. why she walked out and 2. why she came back and 3. what is going on with Dean?!
kitkat1971
12-07-2014
Originally Posted by Ell_Ren:
“This has confused me, Dean was clearly angry when he came out of prison, but why at Shirley? His mum was actually the last person he called before he was taken away and they had a good relationship before he went to prison. Deans motives have been questionable in the past but he is suddenly referring to having a rubbish childhood and brooding about it in every scene, he had Kevin and Carly and in his first stint he was well adjusted...well to an extent. He was brought up with a family who loved him, albeit minus his mum being there, but I don't know where this whole bitterness has come from.
At least Shirley came back to find the kids and sort it out, IRL that doesn't always happen. I'm interested to find out 1. why she walked out and 2. why she came back and 3. what is going on with Dean?!”

It's the stuff like them saying that he and Lee met which as Lee is about 4 years younger thanbDean means Shirley $ust have stuck around longer (unless Kevin kept up contact with the Carters after Shirley left by why would he) and Dean saying he doesn't remember Shirley being with him as he is with George. Well he wouldn't if she'd gone by that age. $

I agree all this stuff about his unhappy childhood seems strange as his relationship with Kevin and Carly and Jimbo was good. No, he didn't have a mother but seemed to have coped first time round - he did have a family.

All I can think is prison along with losing Kevin at the same time embittered him so much that he no longer thinks straight and has focused all his anger and resentment on his absent mother.
AcerBen
12-07-2014
Originally Posted by Broken_Arrow:
“Dean no longer makes any sense to me. When he appeared previously he was a reasonably together young man who although abandoned AS A BABY by his mother wasn't mentally screwed. A lot has happened to him since then which explains some of his current behaviour but not his creepy mother/son obsession with Linda. We're also faced with the retcon of Dean now no longer being abandoned as a baby but as a teenager. The new Dean had a childhood where he knew Shirley as a mother whereas the old one didn't. I can't reconcile this retcon and therefore the character makes no sense anymore. It's almost as bad as the head swapping Sam Mitchell underwent in which she forgot her entire 2002-2005 stint as Kim Medcalf.”

This is what I'm so confused about! I seem to remember that Dean and Shirley got on reasonably well last time round, and the only reason he turned on her was because it turned out Kevin wasn't his father? The whole bitterness about his childhood doesn't make sense because he already forgave her for that I thought, and he was so young when she left anyway. He'd had a reasonably normal upbringing by Kevin no? So the only explanation is as you say, they've retconned it without properly explaining it.
AcerBen
12-07-2014
Originally Posted by james_killroy:
“Eastenders haven't retconned anything.

One episode before Shirley said she walked out on her family 15 years ago, Dean confirmed he left Kevin when she was a baby. This was stated on screen. EE arent going to make a massive continuity error in the space of 2 episodes.

The fire at Mick's pub happened 15 years ago.

When Phil was telling Shirley she needed to make things right with her son. It was Mick she went running to not Dean.

So while confusing Shirley was talking about walking out on her son Mick 15 years ago NOT Dean and Carly. She had already walked away from them prior.

They could have made it more clear but the actual Mick twist hadn't been revealed at that point so its easy to see why people got mixed up with the facts however now in hindsight its clear to see what she was referring to.


The only actual retcon, if you can call it that, is Dean's sudden bitterness. Carly was the one who had a problem with Shirley, Dean was fine with Shirley until his return from prison but Shirley had nothing to do with the fact he ended up in jail. I agree Dea nhas always had questionable motives, like drugging Stacey so he could have sex with her, but other than that he was never messed up the way he is now.”

Perhaps you're right. I suppose he may only have got in touch with Stan in recent years too. The bitterness is confusing. When he first came back I was wondering to myself what he hell did Shirley do? It can't have been that bad because I don't remember.

What is it about his childhood that was so bad if Shirley wasn't even there? He speaks about it as if she was there and he has only bad memories.
AcerBen
12-07-2014
Originally Posted by kitkat1971:
“It's the stuff like them saying that he and Lee met which as Lee is about 4 years younger thanbDean means Shirley $ust have stuck around longer (unless Kevin kept up contact with the Carters after Shirley left by why would he) and Dean saying he doesn't remember Shirley being with him as he is with George. Well he wouldn't if she'd gone by that age. $

I agree all this stuff about his unhappy childhood seems strange as his relationship with Kevin and Carly and Jimbo was good. No, he didn't have a mother but seemed to have coped first time round - he did have a family.

All I can think is prison along with losing Kevin at the same time embittered him so much that he no longer thinks straight and has focused all his anger and resentment on his absent mother.”

That seems like the most logical explanation. It seemed he also struggled with the fact that Kevin wasn't his real father.
Brookside
07-08-2014
Didn't Shirley Carter persuade Dean Wicks to admit to lying about Sean Slater attacking Patrick Trueman? This then led to prison, Chelsea Fox got less years then him dispite both committing the same crime. I presumed Dean has been assaulted in prison in various ways so when he came out he took it out on Shirley.

Not to mention her lie that Kevin Wicks was their Dad when he wasn't and not to mention her part in Kevin's death along with Phil Mitchell (I know she didn't do anything but she was the last person to see him alive which must have hurt.)

Then he comes back and likely wishes he had the Carters around, not to mention the fact Shirley had all this family when she didn't bother to be a mum for so long.
dd68
07-08-2014
I don't think we have ever had a clear explanation
SULLA
07-08-2014
Originally Posted by wizardt:
“Shirley abandoned Dean and Carly when they were very young.

Do we actually know why Shirley walked out on them or will we find out?”

She was a very bad mommy.
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map