Just curious. It used to be a standard the two or more housemates with the most nominations face eviction which used to equate about half the evictions had to people up which is basically non existent these days.

It felt like a much more natural less interference version of Big Brother when it was only two. Obviously it did mean that the majority "cool gang" could get there way some of the time though. It could be very frustrating the ones you didn't like avoiding facing eviction every single week for a period of time (which doesn't happen these days...as much). But I remember the feeling of relief when someone you didn't like finally did face eviction.

Just wondering what people thought?

Poll up soon

no head to heads are boring 3+ up is more exciting

I don't tbh they were very predictable and you knew who was going most of time .

Poll up now

Not at all. I much prefer having a broader choice. The head to heads used to frustrate me

Should have been 3 or more from the start.

Yes! I used to LOVE a good head-to-head, Lea/Richard (BB7), Maxwell/Science (BB6), Kemal/Orlaith (BB6), Heaven/Rebeckah (BB12), Deana/Lydia (BB13) always good viewing. Unless it was an obvious one, bit like Grace/Nikki in BB7!

I prefer it with 3 or more up. More exciting and interesting.

Yup me too. Too predictable with just 2.

I prefer some head to head evictions, not too many, like BB13. Usually two or three per series.

Although, I like it when 3 or more are up. It makes evictions less predictable as that way, there's usually two disliked housemates, so it could be either one of them. For example, Week 1, you had Danielle, Jale and Tamara. Both Danielle and Tamara were unpopular, so both had a equal chance of going.
And Week 3, where both Ash and Toya were unpopular, so either one or the other would of went.

This years evictions have been very unpredictable, imo. Bar Pauline's and this week's eviction.