Not heard read this before, what a shock = double standards
Danielle a web cam girl
1 of 2
Originally Posted by FredtheGerbil:
“Not heard read this before, what a shock = double standards”
“Not heard read this before, what a shock = double standards”
She has quite a history! she's @Imogen and 'CLASSICFOX on twitter. And Imogen on BluebirdTV....and this clip
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=MYNk_ORSn64
We have known this since launch night, I'm getting sick of Ch5 trying to set her up now, every week Rylan shows the latest evictee a picture of Danielle glamour modelling, he doesn't do it for anyone else.
I knew about the glamour/underwear modelling from the start but not the sex line stuff.
That makes her such a f*cking hypocrit in regards to her being offended about the sex talk at the beginning of the series.
That makes her such a f*cking hypocrit in regards to her being offended about the sex talk at the beginning of the series.
Except of course, her webcam persona is a catholic virgin who doesn't talk about sex.
Sound familiar?
And I wish people would stop saying "sex chat line".
She was a daytime girl on Bluebird TV.
If you've called her up and heard her speaking about sex then fair enough. But otherwise she's been a chat line girl.
Sound familiar?
And I wish people would stop saying "sex chat line".
She was a daytime girl on Bluebird TV.
If you've called her up and heard her speaking about sex then fair enough. But otherwise she's been a chat line girl.
oh ffs Rylan just got that saucy picture of Danielle out again to show Jale. Getting past a joke, this. Great to see that Jale didn't seem bothered tho.
Eff off Rylan just eff off
Eff off Rylan just eff off
Originally Posted by dtorre:
“Why do they block out her nipples on that picture? Seems unnecessary for the kind of show BOTS is”
“Why do they block out her nipples on that picture? Seems unnecessary for the kind of show BOTS is”
Because the original version isn't online. It was in Nuts or Zoo or FHM, I think?
The version they're showing is the already-edited one from Daily Star
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/tv/big-br...g-she-s-classy
@emptybox
It was an adult chat line.
You don't pay £1.50/min to talk about the weather
btw, did you see this one?
http://www.malaysia-chronicle.com/in...#axzz36KnvAR62
Originally Posted by JesuLeChop:
“We have known this since launch night, I'm getting sick of Ch5 trying to set her up now, every week Rylan shows the latest evictee a picture of Danielle glamour modelling, he doesn't do it for anyone else.”
“We have known this since launch night, I'm getting sick of Ch5 trying to set her up now, every week Rylan shows the latest evictee a picture of Danielle glamour modelling, he doesn't do it for anyone else.”
I wish they'd stop doing that, wait until she is there to defend herself.
Originally Posted by redex:
“I knew about the glamour/underwear modelling from the start but not the sex line stuff.
That makes her such a f*cking hypocrit in regards to her being offended about the sex talk at the beginning of the series.”
“I knew about the glamour/underwear modelling from the start but not the sex line stuff.
That makes her such a f*cking hypocrit in regards to her being offended about the sex talk at the beginning of the series.”
See that's what I mean. People on here say "sex line", and you just take that at face value, without looking into it.
There's no evidence of any sex chat from her.
Originally Posted by dtorre:
“Why do they block out her nipples on that picture? Seems unnecessary for the kind of show BOTS is”
“Why do they block out her nipples on that picture? Seems unnecessary for the kind of show BOTS is”
Because that's the photo as it appears online.
BBBOTS didn't add the hearts.
Originally Posted by emptybox:
“Except of course, her webcam persona is a catholic virgin who doesn't talk about sex.
Sound familiar?
And I wish people would stop saying "sex chat line".
She was a daytime girl on Bluebird TV.
If you've called her up and heard her speaking about sex then fair enough. But otherwise she's been a chat line girl.”
“Except of course, her webcam persona is a catholic virgin who doesn't talk about sex.
Sound familiar?
And I wish people would stop saying "sex chat line".
She was a daytime girl on Bluebird TV.
If you've called her up and heard her speaking about sex then fair enough. But otherwise she's been a chat line girl.”
I can't see her being a virgin, in the discussion about spitting or swallowing, she said she always spat. She is letting her guard down
Originally Posted by dtorre:
“Why do they block out her nipples on that picture? Seems unnecessary for the kind of show BOTS is”
“Why do they block out her nipples on that picture? Seems unnecessary for the kind of show BOTS is”
Maybe they're hideous looking, like burgers?
Originally Posted by FredtheGerbil:
“I can't see her being a virgin, in the discussion about spitting or swallowing, she said she always spat. She is letting her guard down”
“I can't see her being a virgin, in the discussion about spitting or swallowing, she said she always spat. She is letting her guard down”
You can spit or swallow, technically you are still a virgin
Originally Posted by emptybox:
“See that's what I mean. People on here say "sex line", and you just take that at face value, without looking into it.
There's no evidence of any sex chat from her.”
“See that's what I mean. People on here say "sex line", and you just take that at face value, without looking into it.
There's no evidence of any sex chat from her.”
No, I looked at the pictures of her on lic.me before I posted.
There's no f*cking way she'd dress like that if it WASN'T a sex chat line.
Originally Posted by sangreal:
“Because the original version isn't online. It was in Nuts or Zoo or FHM, I think?
The version they're showing is the already-edited one from Daily Star
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/tv/big-br...g-she-s-classy
@emptybox
It was an adult chat line.
You don't pay £1.50/min to talk about the weather
btw, did you see this one?
http://www.malaysia-chronicle.com/in...#axzz36KnvAR62”
“Because the original version isn't online. It was in Nuts or Zoo or FHM, I think?
The version they're showing is the already-edited one from Daily Star
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/tv/big-br...g-she-s-classy
@emptybox
It was an adult chat line.
You don't pay £1.50/min to talk about the weather
btw, did you see this one?
http://www.malaysia-chronicle.com/in...#axzz36KnvAR62”
We've had this talk before. There's no way you pay £1.50 per minute and get to talk to the girl on screen. It just doesn't make economic sense.
That would only bring in £90 per hour max. That would not pay for the girl, cameraman, studio etc.
It's obviously a scam, where you listen in to a recorded message or something. That's if you ever actually get through.
That's an interesting article, but full of contradictions.
The girl is supposedly 22, so three years younger than Danielle. But Danielle looks far younger in all those pics.
Plus the girl says Danielle has been living with a boyfriend in London for years, at the same time as chasing after her female friend, and wanting a wealthy boyfriend?
Unless all this supposedly took place years ago, when the girl in the pics was just a teenager?
You'll not be surprised I don't give it much credence.
Originally Posted by emptybox:
“We've had this talk before. There's no way you pay £1.50 per minute and get to talk to the girl on screen. It just doesn't make economic sense.
That would only bring in £90 per hour max. That would not pay for the girl, cameraman, studio etc.
It's obviously a scam, where you listen in to a recorded message or something. That's if you ever actually get through.
That's an interesting article, but full of contradictions.
The girl is supposedly 22, so three years younger than Danielle. But Danielle looks far younger in all those pics.
Plus the girl says Danielle has been living with a boyfriend in London for years, at the same time as chasing after her female friend, and wanting a wealthy boyfriend?
Unless all this supposedly took place years ago, when the girl in the pics was just a teenager?
You'll not be surprised I don't give it much credence.”
“We've had this talk before. There's no way you pay £1.50 per minute and get to talk to the girl on screen. It just doesn't make economic sense.
That would only bring in £90 per hour max. That would not pay for the girl, cameraman, studio etc.
It's obviously a scam, where you listen in to a recorded message or something. That's if you ever actually get through.
That's an interesting article, but full of contradictions.
The girl is supposedly 22, so three years younger than Danielle. But Danielle looks far younger in all those pics.
Plus the girl says Danielle has been living with a boyfriend in London for years, at the same time as chasing after her female friend, and wanting a wealthy boyfriend?
Unless all this supposedly took place years ago, when the girl in the pics was just a teenager?
You'll not be surprised I don't give it much credence.
”
From what I can gather, you get options to speak to the girl on screen, listen in, or speak to an off screen girl.
Re: ex best friend, Emma-Louise
I posted some more info here
http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showt...0#post73644400
See the twitter pics & dates.
They were friends up until some time last year, which matches with the article....
Well this guy is ringing them up and talking to them.....about cricket. Hilarious
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AyZNpa9WelI
Can't see a 'recorded' conversation working that well in this scenario. Her knowledge of Jonathan Trott's debut hundred is impressive
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AyZNpa9WelI
Can't see a 'recorded' conversation working that well in this scenario. Her knowledge of Jonathan Trott's debut hundred is impressive
Originally Posted by emptybox:
“We've had this talk before. There's no way you pay £1.50 per minute and get to talk to the girl on screen. It just doesn't make economic sense.
That would only bring in £90 per hour max. That would not pay for the girl, cameraman, studio etc.
It's obviously a scam, where you listen in to a recorded message or something. That's if you ever actually get through.
That's an interesting article, but full of contradictions.
The girl is supposedly 22, so three years younger than Danielle. But Danielle looks far younger in all those pics.
Plus the girl says Danielle has been living with a boyfriend in London for years, at the same time as chasing after her female friend, and wanting a wealthy boyfriend?
Unless all this supposedly took place years ago, when the girl in the pics was just a teenager?
You'll not be surprised I don't give it much credence.”
“We've had this talk before. There's no way you pay £1.50 per minute and get to talk to the girl on screen. It just doesn't make economic sense.
That would only bring in £90 per hour max. That would not pay for the girl, cameraman, studio etc.
It's obviously a scam, where you listen in to a recorded message or something. That's if you ever actually get through.
That's an interesting article, but full of contradictions.
The girl is supposedly 22, so three years younger than Danielle. But Danielle looks far younger in all those pics.
Plus the girl says Danielle has been living with a boyfriend in London for years, at the same time as chasing after her female friend, and wanting a wealthy boyfriend?
Unless all this supposedly took place years ago, when the girl in the pics was just a teenager?
You'll not be surprised I don't give it much credence.
”
Originally Posted by sangreal:
“From what I can gather, you get options to speak to the girl on screen, listen in, or speak to an off screen girl.
Re: ex best friend, Emma-Louise
I posted some more info here
http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showt...0#post73644400
See the twitter pics & dates.
They were friends up until some time last year, which matches with the article....”
“From what I can gather, you get options to speak to the girl on screen, listen in, or speak to an off screen girl.
Re: ex best friend, Emma-Louise
I posted some more info here
http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showt...0#post73644400
See the twitter pics & dates.
They were friends up until some time last year, which matches with the article....”
Well, time will tell.
I've no problem if it turns out she's everything you think she is.
Originally Posted by secrethousemate:
“Well this guy is ringing them up and talking to them.....about cricket. Hilarious
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AyZNpa9WelI
Can't see a 'recorded' conversation working that well in this scenario. Her knowledge of Jonathan Trott's debut hundred is impressive”
“Well this guy is ringing them up and talking to them.....about cricket. Hilarious
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AyZNpa9WelI
Can't see a 'recorded' conversation working that well in this scenario. Her knowledge of Jonathan Trott's debut hundred is impressive
”
Not sure if Danielle knows about cricket?
Perhaps she could talk about her chihuahua?
1 of 2
