Originally Posted by Peter Venkman:
“I agree that it should have been a red card and a free kick. A red card for Robben and a free kick for Brazil.
Robben gets touched no doubt, but there was barely any power in that and any non cheat would have continue running. It certainly wasn't strong enough to hold him back and collapse like a bullet had gone into his legs.
Stupid, cheating big guloot”
This is what annoys me though. They are playing to win the ball on the ground, with their feet. Any deliberate touch on Robben's upper body as he sprints past Thiago Silva there IS a foul. I'm sick of hearing commentators saying 'not much contact' or 'not enough contact.' Any contact by Thiago Silva there that doesn't fairly play the ball is a foul. There should be a better way for players to indicate that they want the free kick/penalty and not the advantage played, than throwing themself to the ground theatrically but unfortunately there isn't. The onus is also on the referees/lawmakers here, not just the players. Perhaps we need to look at rugby-type advantages where if they don't lead to a big advantage then they get pulled back anyway. It was implemented beautifully in the English Premiership recently, someone will remind me which ref. I think that's fair, Thiago Silva has unfairly impeded Robben's run there, so Robben should be able to go on and try and score having been impeded but if he misses it should be pulled back for the free kick/penalty as punishment for being impeded. It might lead to much less red cards as well.
I agree that 'diving' or feigning a foul which didn't exist IS cheating but going down theatrically to highlight a foul which did exist is not cheating.
How would you suggest that players indicate to the referee 'I'd like a penalty/free kick, not the advantage played?' It's a split second thing, they're not sat round a table discussing it. The only way I can see for them to indicate that currently is to go to ground theatrically.