Also, if she's been in a relationship with this Craig Hemphill for years, and they share a flat in Barking. How come he hasn't stepped forward before now?
Is he in on the scam, and if so, how does this fit in with her dating Dexter Koh last year?

Far too many inconsistencies.

Girls kiss girls all the time with the aim of turning blokes on

No, she was a liar from the start of the house I would be very surprised if she has ever set foot in a church

If anyone is a closet lesbian in there it is Helen. She has no interest in any affection from a guy unless he's paying.

I think Helen really fancies ash but he's not going there

Secretly in luv with Ashleigh.

PLOT TWI5T.

This is a spectacularly uninsightful remark. Well done! Hope you're enjoying the school holidays!

Yes, again, for sure.

Though if Danielle is just playing this devout catholic virgin character, then yes, maybe the long-term boyfriend is in on the scam.

As for Dexter, I doubt there was any serious relationship there.
Didn't she actually say on the show that he just "hired" her to sell that story to the DS?
I don't doubt that they're "friends" though....


Girls do, maybe, yes. But do supposed classy old-fashioned devout catholic virgins?

She's not a devout virgin catholic though she's been exposed why is it even discussed any more? She's a fake, why can't we get rid of her at least the others put a bit more effort into the fakeness shes is just lazy. Even this gameplay business has been planned from the start.

She hasn't been exposed.

She's been shown to have done more glamour work than she's admitted to, and been on webcams and chatlines.
But there's no real evidence that she's not a devout catholic, or a virgin.

She might be, or she might not be. So far it's all just assumptions.

Full of insight actually. A large majority of hookers are lesbian or can't stand the thought of intimacy with a man. Some sweaty 60 year old huffing and puffing on top of them is strictly a financial arrangement only.

What's your point? Jesus turned water into wine!

Who is this "we" you speak about I am afraid you don't speak for everyone. As for your other points I think you should be careful unless you have proof of what you re saying you are not allowed to do that.

Not allowed to do what?

What does that mean?
Why are you trying to censor people all the time?
Yesterday you were trying to tell me what I could or couldn't say about Danielle. (Saying just say you don't like her and leave it at that....on a public forum for everyone to air their opinions!!)
Is it only you that can put what you think about her?

That made me think of Steph's reply to Alexandra in BB9.... "never be ready for what?"

The poster if you check said "we" in their post no one on here speaks for all f/m's posters should not assume they speak on behalf of everyone.

I think that it would be interesting if there was some kind of task where she had to demonstrate her religious knowledge. i suspect that it may be a little lacking..

As long as she doesn't want to get married

I didnt mean that, i meant the be careful, you are not allowed bit...
It sounded threatening.

It was the royal we, I meant me and the queen

Oh, I thought it was grape juice.

Or even biology, claiming to have have had sex on a deserted beach and claiming to be a virgin might get her a D minus

People are making libellous statements which is against forum rules. e.g. claiming that a particular HM is a lesbian.

I never said she was or wasn't a lesbian
She's a liar though