Originally Posted by Xela M:
“Right... Germany's best players were Lahm, Schweinsteiger, Kroos, Mueller, Hummels, Goetze (yesterday) and Neuer. How many of them played in the Premier League last season?
Oezil has actually been one of Germany's worst players (by their standards). Schürrle was the only good German from the Premier League and even he didn't have a permanent spot in the start XI.”
Ozil had a fantastic game in the final. He was one of the best players on the pitch.
And the Daily Mail propoganda against Ozil has been false as well. He's been very good in previous games as well. His passing, dribbling and chances created stats are among the best in the tournament. There's a reason Michel Platini asked for Ozil's shirt.
Ozil has been fantastic for the Germans. Staticically, he's been better than Kroos and Lahm in most key areas. But when the British media decides they've got it in for someone (and they've had the knives out for Ozil since the middle of last season) it's incredibly difficult to shift their narrative. So even strong performances can be reported as "disappointing". And we the gulliable public often fall for it. Especially when Ozil is not really the type of midfielder known for scoring goals. But he's created a lot for Germany.