|
||||||||
has the 2 sets of HOH twist bombed? |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#26 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,172
|
Quote:
Spot on, it has sucked for floaters who on a normal season would be making jury. Paola had Spencer/Sharon/Kathy written all over her, as does Victoria actually.
Paola was actually a good character this season and I'd rather she still be there honestly. Had she got into power, she would've taken a stand against the 'house'. (also Kathy was great comic relief I'm glad she made it to jury) |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: London
Posts: 4,612
|
It would have worked better if the cast were two lots of 8, originals vs. vets, family feuds or two teams being pitted against each other. Each week the two teams compete for HOH separately so the two HOHs are guaranteed to be from either camp.
All they are doing is using it to get rid of the middle-ground women. |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: London
Posts: 9,190
|
this twist would of worked better on an All-Star season imo.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,011
|
To call those who are just in the house for a holiday or to be on TV 'floaters' is flattering them, it suggests they have some kind of gameplan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 3,746
|
Quote:
this twist would of worked better on an All-Star season imo.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,011
|
Getting the food competition replaced with a more meaningful one was great, I've always said the food episode wasn't that interesting. But this is Big Brother, more limitations have to be given to the HGs rather than just letting them neutralise a twist. Big Brother should mean HGs not in total control.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 15:13.


