• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
We need To use their Ambition...
lwo
06-03-2005
Against them!
We need to look @ Karma this would make Ideal priciple
of Big brother 6.
You think back how many of us were Screaming @ the TV screen last year when doby and Da Ganster were being really nasty etc.
It would be prefect i know the producers have aleady
said no "Evil" BB this time but working on that if their good No worries if their bad!!....oh oh
sharon curtis
07-03-2005
I'm sorry but this post makes no sense at all to me.
Scots rool
07-03-2005
Originally Posted by sharon curtis:
“I'm sorry but this post makes no sense at all to me.”

No, nor me
batgirl
07-03-2005
Maybe lwo is suggesting that BB should kill the housemates and somehow track them through to their next incarnation - if the HMs have been bad, they'll come back as an ant or a smelly sock or something and if they've been good, they'll come back as David Beckham. The newly re-incarnated HMs would then be locked up in the house for a bit before being bumped off again etc. Hmmm... interesting... but I can foresee a couple of problems.
Scots rool
07-03-2005
Originally Posted by batgirl:
“Maybe lwo is suggesting that BB should kill the housemates and somehow track them through to their next incarnation - if the HMs have been bad, they'll come back as an ant or a smelly sock or something and if they've been good, they'll come back as David Beckham. The newly re-incarnated HMs would then be locked up in the house for a bit before being bumped off again etc. Hmmm... interesting... but I can foresee a couple of problems.”

Yeah, one or two problems spring to mind immediately Batgirl...........
batgirl
07-03-2005
Originally Posted by Scots rool:
“Yeah, one or two problems spring to mind immediately Batgirl...........”

But now I'm thinking that we've already seen some HMs who were ambitious enough to give it a go. I bet Emma would, if someone explained it to her properly.
FinalBroadcast
07-03-2005
Originally Posted by batgirl:
“But now I'm thinking that we've already seen some HMs who were ambitious enough to give it a go. I bet Emma would, if someone explained it to her properly. ”

How do you explain re-incarnation to her? I'd pay to see that
Scots rool
07-03-2005
Originally Posted by batgirl:
“But now I'm thinking that we've already seen some HMs who were ambitious enough to give it a go. I bet Emma would, if someone explained it to her properly. ”

The programme is only on for 10 weeks tho'............
Would that be long enough to explain to her
batgirl
07-03-2005
Right, no, it couldn't be done in 10 weeks anyway. Not enough time to get the people in there, kill them and then round up the reincarnated versions.
batgirl
07-03-2005
PS - I wonder what lwo really meant. I hope s/he comes back to tell us.
Sigurd
07-03-2005
Originally Posted by lwo:
“Against them!
We need to look @ Karma this would make Ideal priciple
of Big brother 6.

You think back how many of us were Screaming @ the TV screen last year when doby and Da Ganster were being really nasty etc.

It would be prefect i know the producers have aleady
said no "Evil" BB this time but working on that if their good No worries if their bad!!....oh oh ”

Does "doby" = "Dobby the House-elf" (Harry Potter) = Marco?

And presumably "Da Ganster" = Victor?

I suspect that lwo may be suggesting that if a housemate is "really nasty", then they should be punished in some way.

batgirl
07-03-2005
Gawd, imagine all the HMs trying to be good so as not to get punished.

Punish the nice ones I say! Anyone who does their fair share of the housework or cooks more than two nights in a row should be flogged (using damp tea-towels).

Oh yes, Batgirl Big Brother (BBB) would be the nastiest of them all.
dawson
07-03-2005
Originally Posted by Aquila:
“Does "doby" = "Dobby the House-elf" (Harry Potter) = Marco?

And presumably "Da Ganster" = Victor?

I suspect that lwo may be suggesting that if a housemate is "really nasty", then they should be punished in some way.

”

Yeah..give 'em a cold shower....give 'em the sniffles. :yawn:
Sigurd
07-03-2005
Since BB thrives on conflict and nastiness (which the producers encourage by, for example, dishing out booze), I think lwo's idea (if I've understood it correctly) is unlikely to be put into practice!

Sigurd
07-03-2005
Originally Posted by batgirl:
“Gawd, imagine all the HMs trying to be good so as not to get punished.

Punish the nice ones I say! Anyone who does their fair share of the housework or cooks more than two nights in a row should be flogged (using damp tea-towels).

Oh yes, Batgirl Big Brother (BBB) would be the nastiest of them all. ”

To be fair, if in BBB the good are to be punished, presumably the evil should be rewarded too?

Cream cakes and champagne for the first HM to murder another, perhaps?

batgirl
08-03-2005
Originally Posted by Aquila:
“To be fair, if in BBB the good are to be punished, presumably the evil should be rewarded too?

Cream cakes and champagne for the first HM to murder another, perhaps?

”

Good thinking.

But surely a three album record deal would be an even better incentive.
Scots rool
08-03-2005
Originally Posted by batgirl:
“Good thinking.

But surely a three album record deal would be an even better incentive. ”

How about anyone who even thinks, about appearing in ok/heat etc, is flogged to within an inch of their life.
Could also shave off all their hair, prior to entering & make them wear sackcloth & ashes
Hmmmmmmm.......... maybe even a bit of tarring & feathering
Scots rool
08-03-2005
Or even a bed of nails
Or even Jaggy Jumper Home scenario
Or even....................
lulu g
08-03-2005
Originally Posted by Aquila:
“To be fair, if in BBB the good are to be punished, presumably the evil should be rewarded too?

Cream cakes and champagne for the first HM to murder another, perhaps?

”

If only they'd thought of that sooner. Could it come into effect retroactively, d'you think?
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map