• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
'Webcam girl' Danielle explains herself
<<
<
4 of 8
>>
>
GottaBeAdored
16-07-2014
Originally Posted by Penny Crayon:
“I saw her on a site where she advertised herself as Imogen - she was dressed in sexy lingerie and in one pic a tiny little tartan skirt. It didn't look like the sort of site where people just ring up for a friendly chat.

The documentuary was all about Danielle the virgin - I think that is just one of her personas - Imogen looks to be quite a different ball game. The girl wouldn't know the truth if it bit her on the bum - she got off quite lightly there I think.”

The problem here as usual it's all a helluva lot of assumptions and "I think" rather than any sort of proof or facts.
sangreal
16-07-2014
Originally Posted by Galacticus:
“What have people got against providing links? What site? Where? Pretty please..”

Danielle, as Imogen on Bluebird & Rampant TV
http://lic.me/search/?p=6&s=imogen&pp=16

More stuff here
http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showt...1#post73508431
Dave Mac
16-07-2014
Originally Posted by James Frederick:
“It's not even her work I care about but the fact she has lied and is a hypocrite over it

If someone went into the house with what views she claims to have about sex ect I would like them as I have similar views.

If your going to do that kind of work don't lie about it and try to pretend to be someone your not.”

Exactly my feelings too. I wouldn't really care if she was a pornstar so long as she wasn't portraying herself as Miss squeaky clean, innocent virgin.

She's done adult phone lines, webcamming and glamour shoots talking about favourite sex positions and she doesn't know what happens in a porn film?... Please.
Galacticus
16-07-2014
Originally Posted by James Frederick:
“http://s30.postimg.org/5wcvj42f5/image.jpg”

Thanks for that, and it certainly appears to be Danielle. However it is not obviously from a webcam; it is heavily compressed and possibly cropped so could have been taken with any camera. Even if it was taken with a webcam there is nothing to suggest that this was done during a paid web session or indeed any online session at all.
Darcyprincess
16-07-2014
Originally Posted by Dave Mac:
“Exactly my feelings too. I wouldn't really care if she was a pornstar so long as she wasn't portraying herself as Miss squeaky clean, innocent virgin.

She's done adult phone lines, webcamming and glamour shoots talking about favourite sex positions and she doesn't know what happens in a porn film?... Please.”

Exactly, she is fake and the biggest liar in the house it seems.
Penny Crayon
16-07-2014
Originally Posted by GottaBeAdored:
“The problem here as usual it's all a helluva lot of assumptions and "I think" rather than any sort of proof or facts.”

I can't find the link for the site I was referring to - I think it was pretty safe to assume that guys weren't ringing up to ask what she had for tea.

Fair enough if you want to remain open minded but it was pretty clear to me that all the girls on the site were offering 'sexy' chat - actually as I recall (i may be wrong) it was actually advertised as just that.

Apologies for not being able to find the link.
Darcyprincess
16-07-2014
Originally Posted by Penny Crayon:
“I saw her on a site where she advertised herself as Imogen - she was dressed in sexy lingerie and in one pic a tiny little tartan skirt. It didn't look like the sort of site where people just ring up for a friendly chat.

The documentuary was all about Danielle the virgin - I think that is just one of her personas - Imogen looks to be quite a different ball game. The girl wouldn't know the truth if it bit her on the bum - she got off quite lightly there I think.”

I agree Penny, she has been living a lie the whole time in the house and what good little catholic girl constantly says Jesus Christ all the time like she does?
Galacticus
16-07-2014
Originally Posted by sangreal:
“Danielle, as Imogen on Bluebird & Rampant TV
http://lic.me/search/?p=6&s=imogen&pp=16

More stuff here
http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showt...1#post73508431”

Thanks!
AOTB
16-07-2014
Originally Posted by James Frederick:
“http://s30.postimg.org/5wcvj42f5/image.jpg”

Errr..
alias alias
16-07-2014
Originally Posted by Just a little 1:
“If you look at the tones around the neck area of picture it is unbalanced to the rest of the body in the picture. The neck area also looks smudged. If you increase picture size you can see jagged edges on the body line.

Questionable picture and I would not deem this as concrete proof.”

The entire photo has jagged edges its a poor quality webcam, a paranoid mind can find Photoshopped alarm bells on any photo full of artifacts.
JesuLeChop
16-07-2014
Originally Posted by Sandra_Hughes2:
“They need to expose Helen and Kim and Steven these 3 are the worst by far”

this x 3817398579287590238789654837912
James Frederick
16-07-2014
Originally Posted by Galacticus:
“Thanks for that, and it certainly appears to be Danielle. However it is not obviously from a webcam; it is heavily compressed and possibly cropped so could have been taken with any camera. Even if it was taken with a webcam there is nothing to suggest that this was done during a paid web session or indeed any online session at all.”

Well for arguments sake lets say it is a private webcam from someone she was involved with it still goes against the character she is portraying as she would never do that.

I may kind of find it annoying as like I said I do have views like what she claims to have maybe not as strong for example I don't think you have to be married to have sex but I do think you should be in love with that person and in a long term relationship what may or may not) lead to marriage.

I don't like sex talk nudity or anything like that so I just see it as her taking the piss out of what I really believe.
Just a little 1
16-07-2014
Originally Posted by alias alias:
“The entire photo has jagged edges its a poor quality webcam, a paranoid mind can find Photoshopped alarm bells on any photo full of artifacts.”

I've been using photoshop for years (graphic designer). The blurring around neck area is disconnected from body.
If someones taken the time to screenshot then why not upload entire video to discredit her. Yes I will keep hmmm'ing until the full video is uploaded.
muggins14
16-07-2014
Originally Posted by Verityvee:
“I understand what your are saying, but in what way has she lied? I realise it isn't usual, but it is possible she is telling the truth about her sex life, and beliefs on that, whilst still being a glamour model, or chatting to people online, isn't it?

I realise she may well not be telling the truth, and could have slept with 300 people like Bianca, for all I know. But equally, isn't it possible she really does believe in not having sex until marriage, and she hasn't been telling lies in this?”

She may very well not believe in having sex before marriage, but even by her own admission she's had O R A L and Dexter has implied (if not stated outright, can't quite recall the finer detail) that they have had sex.

Originally Posted by Cat-:
“Again in agreement with you. Of course it's possible. Why not give her the benefit of the doubt or just forget it and not take her so seriously. That's what I've done on here as there's no point getting into debate where it ends up about religion and all sorts. She's made me laugh more than most through the show. I would even agree with people who say she's mad as a box of frogs and inconsistent, but that's what makes her a good housemate imo. ”

bib - I would agree absolutely. She's extremely inconsistent and definitely putting on an act of some kind, but she's also pretty entertaining and has shown herself to be fairly nice overall (despite what I've seen of her anti-homosexuality tweets). As a housemate she's not been bad value at all.

Originally Posted by paralax:
“They way they are treating her is disgusting, and shame on the BBBOTS gang for being a part of it. They do what they do for money and career and that is what Danielle was doing. I hate the hypocrisy, especially as she was probably invited to do BB. Lamb to the slaughter, and they have set her up for getting the boot on Friday.”

I agree with the BBBOTS thing - it's funny that they haven't shown any naked pictures of Kimberly. They always act as if they are exposing Danielle's glamour work to evicted HMs that don't know about it, when she's been very vocal about what she does to earn a crust, it's no big secret to the HMs. I think that they all hear the religious/anti-sex from Danielle and it washes their brains of the knowledge they have of how she earns a living, otherwise why are they so shocked when BBBOTS shows them pictures of Danielle. It always surprises me how shocked they seem to be.

At the end of the day the HMs know she's a glamour model, they know what industry she works in, they must be pretty stupid to believe that she is quite so innocent as she says she is to be shocked by sexual talk and innuendo when they hear her say she's performed oral sex and hear her swearing like a trooper. If they can't work out in their heads that there are inconsistencies in her story and, instead, prefer to hear only parts of what she says and ignore the others, then they are pretty stupid really.
James Frederick
16-07-2014
Originally Posted by Sandra_Hughes2:
“They need to expose Helen and Kim and Steven these 3 are the worst by far”

Missed this but why Kim

They know she is a Playboy modal

They know she has or had a BF on the outside thanks to BB telling Steven's Mum to put it in her message to him

Kim has been done up worse than Danielle
Verityvee
16-07-2014
Originally Posted by Darcyprincess:
“I agree Penny, she has been living a lie the whole time in the house and what good little catholic girl constantly says Jesus Christ all the time like she does?”

Catholics, and Christians, swear, including saying Christ, bloody, and hell. I don't think I have ever come across a person who I haven't heard swear.
Penny Crayon
16-07-2014
Originally Posted by GottaBeAdored:
“The problem here as usual it's all a helluva lot of assumptions and "I think" rather than any sort of proof or facts.”

Someone has just posted this link - I'm simply drawing your attention to it.

You talk about assumptions - what would you assume looking at this

http://lic.me/search/?p=6&s=imogen&pp=16

Do you think the guys are ringing for a cosy chat?

It's a far cry from Danielle the Virgin Web Cam girl featured on the TV programme the other night and rather different to what she has confessed to in the house. She is a liar and a hypocrite IMO.
James Frederick
16-07-2014
Originally Posted by muggins14:
“I agree with the BBBOTS thing - it's funny that they haven't shown any naked pictures of Kimberly. They always act as if they are exposing Danielle's glamour work to evicted HMs that don't know about it, when she's been very vocal about what she does to earn a crust, it's no big secret to the HMs. I think that they all hear the religious/anti-sex from Danielle and it washes their brains of the knowledge they have of how she earns a living, otherwise why are they so shocked when BBBOTS shows them pictures of Danielle. It always surprises me how shocked they seem to be.

At the end of the day the HMs know she's a glamour model, they know what industry she works in, they must be pretty stupid to believe that she is quite so innocent as she says she is to be shocked by sexual talk and innuendo when they hear her say she's performed oral sex and hear her swearing like a trooper. If they can't work out in their heads that there are inconsistencies in her story and, instead, prefer to hear only parts of what she says and ignore the others, then they are pretty stupid really.”

TBF from what I understand she has told the HM's she does not do topless and only does classy lingerie modelling

Kim has made it quite clear she does Playboy and full nudes
AOTB
16-07-2014
Originally Posted by muggins14:
“She may very well not believe in having sex before marriage, but even by her own admission she's had
O R A L
”

Only Rear Access Lads?
James Frederick
16-07-2014
I know have mentioned this before but does anyone think to do what she does she sees Danielle and Imogen as two different people.

Danielle really is the "good" Catholic girl

Imogen is the "Bad" girl
qwertyell
16-07-2014
Not that I am in any way the "client", but the vidcaps are most definitely from a webcam session. I haven't found the video thus far, just the screen shots. Make of them what you will.

(NSFW)
http://img249.imagevenue.com/img.php..._123_225lo.jpg
http://img7.imagevenue.com/img.php?i..._123_505lo.jpg
http://img43.imagevenue.com/img.php?..._123_199lo.jpg
http://img222.imagevenue.com/img.php..._123_811lo.jpg
http://img142.imagevenue.com/img.php..._5_123_6lo.jpg
http://img218.imagevenue.com/img.php...123_1134lo.jpg
http://img144.imagevenue.com/img.php..._123_550lo.jpg
http://img266.imagevenue.com/img.php..._123_351lo.jpg
http://img177.imagevenue.com/img.php...9_123_69lo.jpg
http://img246.imagevenue.com/img.php..._123_537lo.jpg
http://img234.imagevenue.com/img.php..._123_148lo.jpg
http://img134.imagevenue.com/img.php..._123_218lo.jpg
http://img264.imagevenue.com/img.php..._123_581lo.jpg
http://img153.imagevenue.com/img.php..._123_500lo.jpg
http://img171.imagevenue.com/img.php...123_1087lo.jpg
Penny Crayon
16-07-2014
Originally Posted by James Frederick:
“I know have mentioned this before but does anyone think to do what she does she sees Danielle and Imogen as two different people.

Danielle really is the "good" Catholic girl

Imogen is the "Bad" girl”

No - I think it's purely income from two different sources.
muggins14
16-07-2014
Originally Posted by AOTB:
“Only Rear Access Lads? ”

Is that what oral means, I always wondered

muggins14
16-07-2014
Originally Posted by qwertyell:
“Not that I am in any way the "client", but the vidcaps are most definitely from a webcam session. I haven't found the video thus far, just the screen shots. Make of them what you will.

(NSFW)
http://img249.imagevenue.com/img.php..._123_225lo.jpg
http://img7.imagevenue.com/img.php?i..._123_505lo.jpg
http://img43.imagevenue.com/img.php?..._123_199lo.jpg
http://img222.imagevenue.com/img.php..._123_811lo.jpg
http://img142.imagevenue.com/img.php..._5_123_6lo.jpg
http://img218.imagevenue.com/img.php...123_1134lo.jpg
http://img144.imagevenue.com/img.php..._123_550lo.jpg
http://img266.imagevenue.com/img.php..._123_351lo.jpg
http://img177.imagevenue.com/img.php...9_123_69lo.jpg
http://img246.imagevenue.com/img.php..._123_537lo.jpg
http://img234.imagevenue.com/img.php..._123_148lo.jpg
http://img134.imagevenue.com/img.php..._123_218lo.jpg
http://img264.imagevenue.com/img.php..._123_581lo.jpg
http://img153.imagevenue.com/img.php..._123_500lo.jpg
http://img171.imagevenue.com/img.php...123_1087lo.jpg”

Wow, you really shouldn't have gone to so much trouble
GottaBeAdored
16-07-2014
Originally Posted by Penny Crayon:
“I can't find the link for the site I was referring to - I think it was pretty safe to assume that guys weren't ringing up to ask what she had for tea.

Fair enough if you want to remain open minded but it was pretty clear to me that all the girls on the site were offering 'sexy' chat - actually as I recall (i may be wrong) it was actually advertised as just that.

Apologies for not being able to find the link.”

I know someone who works on a cam site as a "non nude model" and doesn't show a thing despite the vast majority of workers being pretty much hardcore so I wouldn't rule anything out.

The 2nd link is even worse. People do realise that people on those kinds of phone lines aren't actually the ones in the pictures? Right? Most of them do seperate photo shoots with glamour models and hire mainly older woman to take the calls. I'm fairly sure there was a few documentaries on this a year or 2 ago which featured woman taking calls whilst doing the ironing and in between dropping the kids off at school.

I have no idea how much of Danielles character is real or false and I don't really care, I just don't get the operation to "out her" as if she has done something wild or hugely different from what she claims when everything is very mild or not proven.
<<
<
4 of 8
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map