It is based on the compression signature of the images and the cameras known to use this type of compression.


It is also the logical place to put a camera.

What about the pic of her with no knickers on showing her 'lady' ? Whether it's on a webcam or not, or a private session, or even selfies. It's decidely sexual and not something she'd like her mother to see. Seeing as Catholic girls (ahem) are such GOOD VIRGINAL GIRLS BEFORE MARRIAGE.

Love to have a cuppa with Danielle and ask her about her definition of slag/slut/class?self-respect/virginity etc. No probs with what she does. Just don't say other women have no class and that they are slags for talking about and having sex.

No it doesn't. If you put a printed screen picture in your software, it wouldn't say 'screen printed picture', it would make a guess at any number of cameras it could have come from due to how the picture has been compressed. If the picture was made by a computer, it would still guess at cameras and that is why you got 6 or more different camera results


Webcams can go as far away from the computer as the wire will stretch, it can be easily moved away. Also, there would only be a hue if the room was dark

That's not how it seems to work. I took a screenshot using MPC classic and it came up with several software programs (including visio and paint) but no cameras. A screenshot using vlc came up as unknown.


Why would she move the webcam away from the screen? In any case, I'm not saying it definitely was not a webcam; my point is that the assumption that it was one is unsupported; the further assumption that this was part of some web session with another person is even less supported; the then further assumption that this was part of a paid web session with a punter is still less supported.


She was right up close to the camera, there would have been a hue from the screen unless the room was unusually bright which it wasn't.

The supposedly bottomless pic in that sequence has been clearly photoshopped.
If you zoom in you can still see her grey knickers (smudged) at the top of her leg.
Plus the colour underneath is wrong.

Plus it doesn't fit into the sequence. Why would she have put her knickers back on in the subsequent shots?

Plus the title of the video on Pornhub was ".....topless..." not nude.

So it's a topless video.

She clearly does topless webcam for money, extremely few camgirls don't do at least topless and those mostly do other weird/kinky stuff but it's always sexual (JOI, SPH, CBT, sissyfication, leather/latex/rubber wear, feet/shoe worship, age/role play etc.) It's the same with the Blue Bird TV stuff, the website made it clear what kind of service was on offer "DIRTY CHAT". Men don't pay premium rates to discuss politics, fashion, travel, literature or music etc. She also claims to be a lingerie model implying she does classy shoots for fashion brands when in reality she does suggestive and sexualised shoots. The truth is she probably doesn't want her family knowing how she pays for a comfortable lifestyle and has concocted a string of lies about her limits for her family. That's OK by me if she doesn't want them to know but she's made a big mistake by going on Big Brother and being a hypocrite about sexual matters.

Whether it's webcam or stills, or even polaroids......the pictures clearly show she does do DODGY stuff. On BB she kept saying nothing dodgy, nothing dodgy, nothing dodgy, absolutely nothing dodgy.
Not perhaps in THAT webcam docu.
If the pic no.9 showing her lady is not borderline dodgy then perhaps I'm a good classy girl too.

Unlike Helen ? When will that little secret be told ????? Why is BB and BBOTs insistent on portraying Danielle in such a bad light but not Helen - Oh wait - Because they decided to give someone a pass to the final and the public are not too happy with the choice so they are trying to assasinate other housemates each week to try and detract from Helen. Unfortunately they did not bank on Helen being quite so difficult to deflect from. I do think they have given the public food for thought with Biannca ......will it be enough??

I see you're deliberately ignoring the fact that I've explained multiple times that pic has been photoshopped.

Someone put up some topless pictures. They didn't look like screencaps, and I don't think they were from the show that was on C5 the other night.

Seen this humorous pic

Well it made me laugh



http://imgur.com/9xpFexd

Nice.

Though this one made me laugh more
http://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio...21651#12421651