• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
BB outing Danelle but not Helen who has slept with 500men at £180.00 a time
<<
<
2 of 8
>>
>
muggins14
16-07-2014
Originally Posted by Sasparella:
“How many times does this have to be said, there is a court injunction on that (not made by Helen), if they break it then they break the law and will get sued. It's nothing to do with them protecting Helen, they're protecting themselves !”

There isn't an injuction, as far as I know, with regard to Rooney, it's been all over the press. There is an injunction with regard to the alleged famous actor she allegedly slept with

If there were an injunction re. Rooney we wouldn't be allowed to mention him, would we?
JesuLeChop
16-07-2014
Originally Posted by James Frederick:
“It has more to do with the way they are acting

Danielle has gone in with a fake persona (Sex chat hating Catholic who happens to do webcamming and phone sex)

Helen has gone in acting like the loud mouthed bitch she really is”

And what about Steven? Saying he's a millionaire when he just lives at home with Mummy.

Why are they always attacking the women?
JesuLeChop
16-07-2014
Originally Posted by muggins14:
“There isn't an injuction, as far as I know, with regard to Rooney, it's been all over the press. There is an injunction with regard to the alleged famous actor she allegedly slept with

If there were an injunction re. Rooney we wouldn't be allowed to mention him, would we?”

She went all downton on his abbey
AOTB
16-07-2014
Originally Posted by JesuLeChop:
“And what about Steven? Saying he's a millionaire when he just lives at home with Mummy.

Why are they always attacking the women?”

Women = bad
Men = good

(or something like that).
Verityvee
16-07-2014
Originally Posted by muggins14:
“Obviously Danielle and her agents didn't ask for exclusions on her behalf, more fool them ”

Or else BB makes exceptions for some housemates and not others, a bit like the way they treat some housemates and not others..
James Frederick
16-07-2014
Originally Posted by JesuLeChop:
“And what about Steven? Saying he's a millionaire when he just lives at home with Mummy.

Why are they always attacking the women?”

I would love Steven to be shown for the lying SOB he is
Sasparella
16-07-2014
Originally Posted by Verityvee:
“Agree. As I understood it, there was only one injunction in place, in reference to a particular client of Helen's who could not be mentioned. That is all.

Have there been people in the house in the past who have been bound by injunctions?I can't remember who, but somewhere at the back of my mind tells me there was someone.”

Ohhhhhh just been googling to try and find that bit that said about the gagging order, couldn't find it (wish I could remember to bookmark these things lol !) and came across who the actor was ! gobsmacked !
JesuLeChop
16-07-2014
Originally Posted by James Frederick:
“I would love Steven to be shown for the lying SOB he is”

Now that would be Armageddon for me, I would scream my head off
JesuLeChop
16-07-2014
Originally Posted by AOTB:
“Women = bad
Men = good

(or something like that).”

Seems legit
SIOPHIE_FIERCE
16-07-2014
Originally Posted by JesuLeChop:
“Now that would be Armageddon for me, I would scream my head off ”

I would request a split screen showing just Kim and Steven's faces as the whole thing is revealed. Think Kim might actually start weeping, as she realised she got bonked on national TV for no reason at all
Sasparella
16-07-2014
Originally Posted by muggins14:
“There isn't an injuction, as far as I know, with regard to Rooney, it's been all over the press. There is an injunction with regard to the alleged famous actor she allegedly slept with

If there were an injunction re. Rooney we wouldn't be allowed to mention him, would we?”

I thought there was a piece somewhere written about he'd taken a gagging order out when they heard she was going in the house, just been googling, but there's so much about the injunction on the actor that I can't find that piece. It would help if I could remember whether it was in a paper or on here that I'd seen it, but I definitely saw something about it. Could be not true if it was on here that I saw it, or in the Star lol, but the way she said to Ash that she REALLY CAN'T tell him the name made me think it was probably true.
James Frederick
16-07-2014
I have started a thread on this separately but maybe all of this exposing her is just part of the plan she is friends with Dexter after all.

Would it really be a shock if it turned out she was in on it all
SIOPHIE_FIERCE
16-07-2014
Originally Posted by James Frederick:
“I have started a thread on this separately but maybe all of this exposing her is just part of the plan she is friends with Dexter after all.

Would it really be a shock if it turned out she was in on it all”

I highly doubt it. She really looked like a rabbit caught in headlights when the new HMs were introduced and even more so when Bianca came on the screen, I swear I even saw her hands shaking a bit at one point.

She also looked a bit shaken when it was revealed about the webcam girls. I don't think she's that good of an actress to pull of these reactions like she's done.

I wouldn't be surprised if she made a deal with BB that she'd come in with this false persona and play the other HMs but then have the public in about her real persona hence the filming of the Webcam girls etc. For some reason BB don't seem to quite like that idea anymore
muggins14
16-07-2014
Originally Posted by Sasparella:
“I thought there was a piece somewhere written about he'd taken a gagging order out when they heard she was going in the house, just been googling, but there's so much about the injunction on the actor that I can't find that piece. It would help if I could remember whether it was in a paper or on here that I'd seen it, but I definitely saw something about it. Could be not true if it was on here that I saw it, or in the Star lol, but the way she said to Ash that she REALLY CAN'T tell him the name made me think it was probably true.”

Good point, perhaps it's a separate one. A bit like closing the gate once the horse has bolted Not that I think Helen would want to go on BB ranting and raving about it all in any case
JesuLeChop
16-07-2014
Originally Posted by SIOPHIE_FIERCE:
“I would request a split screen showing just Kim and Steven's faces as the whole thing is revealed. Think Kim might actually start weeping, as she realised she got bonked on national TV for no reason at all”

lmao just imagining it in my head now is making my heart beat faster. I NEED this to happen.

I'd even want a 3-way screen so I could see his Mum's face too
James Frederick
16-07-2014
As for the Rooney thing is it possible for a future CBB they don't want to annoy him or his wife or any of their friends/WAGS

OK they may not do it but they may ask their friends not to either
muggins14
16-07-2014
Originally Posted by James Frederick:
“As for the Rooney thing is it possible for a future CBB they don't want to annoy him or his wife or any of their friends/WAGS

OK they may not do it but they may ask their friends not to either”

Oh I think that, if people need the money, they will do it ... even if they are friends of Mr & Mrs Rooney
Sarahmonial2
16-07-2014
Originally Posted by Verityvee:
“Yes, but there is no injunction to stop any discussion of her as a prostitute, indeed she has done so herself on This Morning. Discussing that fact wouldn't be right in itself, but then discussing other housemates pasts, while hushing up the past of someone with, by far, the most salacious backstory, is not in any way equitable.

I understand they would be fearful about opening the floodgates here, but to then treat other housemates in an entirely different way, whilst protecting someone who has sold stories, for example, isn't right.”

Agree, definitely double standards, BB protecting dearest Helen the chosen one again urghhh!
James Frederick
16-07-2014
Originally Posted by muggins14:
“Oh I think that, if people need the money, they will do it ... even if they are friends of Mr & Mrs Rooney ”

Well yeah but IMO it's more likely not to annoy the Rooney's than it is to protect Helen
Egg The Goth
16-07-2014
Hah it still doesn't make Helen a millionaire.

However sh*gging a bunny spreader in public apparently does.Before and after?
Bev75
16-07-2014
What is worse a lying tramp who lied about the amount of money she has made via means of betraying men that she is a virgin or, an up front escort?

I don't like either Helen or Danielle but I can't do with compusive lairs either and that is Danielle. Danielle wouldn't know the truth if it came up to her, smacked her in the face shouting I'M THE TRUTH!!!!
JesuLeChop
16-07-2014
Originally Posted by Bev75:
“What is worse a lying tramp who lied about the amount of money she has made via means of betraying men that she is a virgin or, an up front escort?

I don't like either Helen or Danielle but I can't do with compusive lairs either and that is Danielle. Danielle wouldn't know the truth if it came up to her, smacked her in the face shouting I'M THE TRUTH!!!!”

Nope, that lost me lol

How have any of them betrayed men?
JOSWolf
16-07-2014
Helen is one of their chosen ones. They wouldn't dare upset her.
bunnyinthebox
16-07-2014
Originally Posted by JOSWolf:
“Helen is one of their chosen ones. They wouldn't dare upset her.”

Have you ever watched BBOTS? Helen is hardly a 'chosen one'. They constantly say how much she is hated by the public. It was said tonight about 3 times and Judy James slated helen to the point where Emma actually defended Helen for the 1st time ever.

The chosen one? Yeah, chosen to be the villain of the piece.
kikka
16-07-2014
The programme producers seem to have 'outed' Danielle to build up bad feeling in the house ... which will, in turn, rub off on the 3 newbies who will elect someone to go at the end of the week .

We were told ( on here ) yesterday that their initial thoughts were towards evicting either Danielle or Ashleigh ... and , of course, the producers and certain factions of the public, yet again , for reasons best known to themselves , don't want to lose Ashleigh.

Pity there was nothing to expose about creepy Steve.
<<
<
2 of 8
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map