The public can't vote them all out at once. Odds are that someone else will be really annoying and the public will redirect their votes.

4. It leaves another spare cock for Biannca to take a run at.

Which is why it's such a shame they've brought back the godawful vote to save for their eviction on friday, he'll never get enough votes to stay and he's got by far the most potential of the three to be a worthwhile HM.

It does make you wonder if BB waited to see which way the wind was blowing first.

Didn't BB initially say that we'd be voting to evict one of the new housemates. I may be wrong but I'm pretty sure that they did.

I said much the same thing about the vote to save. Why this week of all weeks? The week that people who think larger than life characters like Bianca or semi-famous people like Zoe will be a cert to be saved. This show is so full of shit and the producers insult our intelligence by the day.

How sure are we that the housemate they choose gets evicted? It could be that they actually get given "the power"? Or maybe that will come into play if the newbies don't follow the script.

Yep, you kind of get the feeling....

It wouldn't suprise me if they talk about evicting one of the cool kids for a day or two only for big brother to show them clips of Chris or Danielle talking about them and then picking one of those two.
I hope they get rid of Steven he will probably cry why me and it will also change the house dynamics.

Doesn't it just.

I honestly can't remember what they said at first but you could well be right, after all they got rid of the f2f nominations after promising them as one of the key elements of armageddon <-- still bitter


Totally agree with you. Every bit of it

I don't think Steve or Kim will go - a lot has happened today which may sway that decision.

Seeing as Zoe already dislikes Kim this video is interesting.

2.MIN
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mHh...1ZVvfpyJIloNrw

That happened this afternoon

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iCYUyDcDTI0

They come as a pair, get rid of them both for me.

The "cool kids" have actually been really nice about the newbies, so there wouldn't be anything nasty to be shown.

It would be an act of kindness to get rid of Steven -he doesn't want the money and would only waste it on fireworks.

Thanks for posting. Wow....it could be Steve or Kim then according to that video. I honestly don't know where Bianca gets the Chris being the biggest manipulator in the house from though?? I know he chats amongst his group and in the DR, but he isn't exactly going between the groups and being manipulative or stirring, or is he and I'm missing something?.

Does she even know what manipulative means?

It's because she's not terribly bright and is just repeating what somebody told her before she went in the house.

I knew that would happen.

I think you are right. Given that she couldn't wait to tell all about Danielle, then it looks likely that she's the one who's going to spread as much stuff as she can to curry favour with one group over another. As if we need more of this?

I much prefer Pav's game out of the three.

And there we go - everyone abhors producer interference unless it yields a result they're happy with.

Oh, if Kim goes and Biannca gets it on with Steven

It would be cringeworthy but highly laughable.

I hope Pav gets his own way, as Zoe tends to take what he says on board, Biannca hasn't a clue on any thoughts. I hope Kimberly goes so she can have a break with supportive friends and family, she needs this before he comes out.

It probably is too good to be true, but out of the choices I feel like Steven would be the most fair. Still not fair, but the most fair out of all housemates.
Up to now he has look set to face the public vote 3 times but has been saved by a twist on 2 of those occasions. The one time he has faced eviction was when he had it easy, when Pauline was up and would go in a landslide against anyone.
He has consistently been at the bottom of the betting and appears to have very few fans, I get the impression that had there been a vote to save at any point then he would have been the most in danger.

The only bad thing if he were to be evicted is that he'd obviously have all the excuses in the world about why he was hard done-by and why it wasn't fair. Sad thing is he'd be right.
But, from a narration standpoint, I would be most satisfied with his eviction over anyone else's.

Or maybe it comes to a point when you realize there's nothing you can do to change it so have to make the best with what you've got.

I would get rid of this twist in a second if I could, but if a preferable result happens then I'd certainly be relieved.

Same here ... no matter what

I hardly dare hope though