DS Forums

 
 

This is intresting from BB10 when the show had rules


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 18-07-2014, 14:48
hyperstarsponge
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: North East
Posts: 12,254

http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/tv/s149/...oKneRbfTg8vUgP

Also for Marcus Akin for entertainment on the late night live feed.
hyperstarsponge is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 18-07-2014, 15:19
RealDipStick
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 478
Kris and Sophie (I think she was still Dogface at the time) were called into the Diary Room and told off by Big Brother for breaking this rule by having a fake romance, I can’t remember if they were formally punished for it, however I do remember that Sophie was wearing a tiny little bikini at the time; funny thing the male memory.
RealDipStick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-07-2014, 15:23
alias alias
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Firefox♂
Posts: 8,304
It's a joke isn't it, haven't they always exposed any "lets have a showmance" Secrete chats so we know its fake, we can usually work it out anyway.


Dogface and kris. I believe they carried on anyway, and wasn't taken seriously. they were kissing in the pool on day 89.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WAie1vnncMo
alias alias is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-07-2014, 15:55
rorybb
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Italia
Posts: 3,019
BB10? You mean the same BB that allowed Siavash to refuse to nominate without any proper consequences for weeks on end? And allowed Marcus to climb on the room? And randomly changed the voting format to save for one week? Yes the rules were certainly respected back then.

Who even cares about rules it's a reality show not the government.
rorybb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-07-2014, 16:06
trollface
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 12,694
I loved how much the housemates broke the rules back in BB10. They realised that Big Brother needed them more than they needed Big Brother. In fact, IIRC, there was a poster here back then who worked on the show, and s/he said that they didn't punish them all that often because they thought that the housemates being punished endlessly would make for boring television.

My favourite was when they talked about nominations so often that Big Brother had no choice but to make it no longer against the rules.

But the biggest shame of all time is that Siavash, Sophie and I think it was Charlie didn't leave the house like they almost egged each other on to do 2 days before the final. I'd have loved to have seen BB try to fill 2 2 hour shows and the live final with just Lisa and David in the house.
trollface is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-07-2014, 16:23
SourGrapes
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,265
I loved how much the housemates broke the rules back in BB10. They realised that Big Brother needed them more than they needed Big Brother. In fact, IIRC, there was a poster here back then who worked on the show, and s/he said that they didn't punish them all that often because they thought that the housemates being punished endlessly would make for boring television.

My favourite was when they talked about nominations so often that Big Brother had no choice but to make it no longer against the rules.

But the biggest shame of all time is that Siavash, Sophie and I think it was Charlie didn't leave the house like they almost egged each other on to do 2 days before the final. I'd have loved to have seen BB try to fill 2 2 hour shows and the live final with just Lisa and David in the house.
A lot of people seemed to have a problem with it at the time, but I thought it was great too. Re. the bit in bold, it's interesting because they basically proved the point that Kitten was making during the first week of BB5, her whole reason for being in the house seemed to be to see what would happen if the housemates rebelled and that was exactly the argument she was making - the only difference is that in BB10 they waited until a few weeks into the series when Siavash and Marcus knew they were popular with the public so the producers wouldn't boot them out, and Sophie certainly didn't fear being evicted. Whereas Kitten was more expendable
SourGrapes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-07-2014, 16:48
trollface
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 12,694
I think the difference between Kitten and the BB10 lot, as well, is that most of the BB10 house rebelled, whereas it was just Kitten in BB5. While the other housemates found her amusing, when it looked like it was going to impact negatively on them she lost her support. Whereas people moaned about Siavash, but broke the rules in their own ways, and everybody moaned about everything that everybody did in that series so moaning about people breaking the rules was just part of the ordinary background noise.
trollface is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-07-2014, 17:50
SpecialFried
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hello Summer, Goodbye
Posts: 3,385
I loved how much the housemates broke the rules back in BB10. They realised that Big Brother needed them more than they needed Big Brother. In fact, IIRC, there was a poster here back then who worked on the show, and s/he said that they didn't punish them all that often because they thought that the housemates being punished endlessly would make for boring television.

My favourite was when they talked about nominations so often that Big Brother had no choice but to make it no longer against the rules.

But the biggest shame of all time is that Siavash, Sophie and I think it was Charlie didn't leave the house like they almost egged each other on to do 2 days before the final. I'd have loved to have seen BB try to fill 2 2 hour shows and the live final with just Lisa and David in the house.
Siavash, Sophie, Charlie and Rodrigo went to the DR and gleefully declared that they were intent on walking out. BB calmly told them that they could leave immediately by the back door with no interviews whatsoever and you could see the rebellion drain out of them on the spot. And that was pretty much that.

SpecialFried is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-07-2014, 18:00
SourGrapes
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,265
I think the difference between Kitten and the BB10 lot, as well, is that most of the BB10 house rebelled, whereas it was just Kitten in BB5. While the other housemates found her amusing, when it looked like it was going to impact negatively on them she lost her support. Whereas people moaned about Siavash, but broke the rules in their own ways, and everybody moaned about everything that everybody did in that series so moaning about people breaking the rules was just part of the ordinary background noise.
Yeah I agree - they must have been pretty worried at one stage though as for a few days a lot of the housemates went along with it to some extent before gradually losing interest or bottling it to the point where only Stuart seemed to be on board.
SourGrapes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-07-2014, 20:28
wonkeydonkey
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: London
Posts: 65,903
Siavash, Sophie, Charlie and Rodrigo went to the DR and gleefully declared that they were intent on walking out. BB calmly told them that they could leave immediately by the back door with no interviews whatsoever and you could see the rebellion drain out of them on the spot. And that was pretty much that.

Lol. I don't remember that, but well done to BB for calling their bluff.
wonkeydonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:15.