Both are heavily hyped Channel 5 twists which failed to deliver on their promise and both had very unsatisfactory endings (most likely). The question I have however is...

Which was worse?

I'm still waiting for Armageddon Week to actually start.

Been pretty boring so far.

White room benefited Conor so it was worse.

Yeah, but on the plus side it got rid of Conor. I don't really care who actually makes money from the show - just who stays and goes - so I was delighted with that outcome

White room felt worse on a fairness level leaving a massive sour taste. Having said that the ending was far more entertaining then this so called 'Armageddon' week.

Oh i was very happy he finally left but was still left feeling sick when he walked away with half of the winners money.

white room was worse, most boring stupid task and the most vile hm walks off with 50k

Both were crap and over hyped.

I didn't like that Conor got half the money but was glad to see him go. Luke S's reaction though was good the huge grin when he thought he had pushed the button then the shock, anger when he realised Conor beat him too it.

Armageddon is just pitiful It's like the blue teams raft, sinking fast.

It's too early to vote yet we need to see if they send someone popular or unpopular home first.

Both twists are bloody unfair though.

That was a classic reaction, up until then the white room was forgettable.

Maybe there is time for Armageddon to produce a similar reaction?

The White Room was far worse because it resulted in Conor receiving half of the prize fund.

we can live in hope

Both overhyped crap.

The White Room rewarded Conor. A man who threatened to sexually assault another housemate with an epilator.

Armageddon at least had an interesting start. Shame it's been followed with just non-stop attacks on Danielle.

Where is the neither - both were terrible and extremely over-hyped option?