• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
whats the bet they put Tamara back in
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
MissPGC
19-07-2014
Lol if they do decide to replace kim with an evictee my money is on tamara.. put someone NEW in
ChynaS
19-07-2014
Sorry but have you never watched BB? People paid to evict Tamara so she cannot go back in.
roseblue1
19-07-2014
Originally Posted by ChynaS:
“Sorry but have you never watched BB? People paid to evict Tamara so she cannot go back in.”

Exactly...
Random42
19-07-2014
I know it's not right or fair to put a HM in that people paid to be booted out. But it wouldn't be the first time it's happened. Nikki Graeme leaps to mind.

Personally I wouldn't mind Tamara being put back in. I think she went too early and it would be interesting to see more of her.

But on principle I do agree it wouldn't be right to just sling her or any ex HM back in there.
MissPGC
19-07-2014
Originally Posted by Random42:
“I know it's not right or fair to put a HM in that people paid to be booted out. But it wouldn't be the first time it's happened. Nikki Graeme leaps to mind.

Personally I wouldn't mind Tamara being put back in. I think she went too early and it would be interesting to see more of her.

But on principle I do agree it wouldn't be right to just sling her or any ex HM back in there.”

was it niki it happened to? I knew it had happened. Previously just couldn't remember who
Random42
19-07-2014
Originally Posted by MissPGC:
“was it niki it happened to? I knew it had happened. Previously just couldn't remember who”

Yes, it was Nikki. Just couldn't keep her out of that house
snickypoo
19-07-2014
Originally Posted by Random42:
“Yes, it was Nikki. Just couldn't keep her out of that house ”

It took ages to actually prise her out of the house on her first eviction! Davina had to go and fetch her out! Poor kid was terrified!
Random42
19-07-2014
Originally Posted by snickypoo:
“It took ages to actually prise her out of the house on her first eviction! Davina had to go and fetch her out! Poor kid was terrified!”

Ha! Oh yes, I'd totally forgotten about that. There was just no shifting the girl.
Addisonian
19-07-2014
Why on Earth would they put Tamara back in? Forgetting for a moment that people paid money to evict her, she was nothing more than a gurning dullard.
MissPGC
19-07-2014
Originally Posted by ChynaS:
“Sorry but have you never watched BB? People paid to evict Tamara so she cannot go back in.”

Oh & to answer your question darling I have indeed watched big brother before & I can tell you they dont care who has paid to vote they still manage to twist their own rules
OldEnough
19-07-2014
Originally Posted by ChynaS:
“Sorry but have you never watched BB? People paid to evict Tamara so she cannot go back in.”

They put Jon back in in BB4
They put Nikki back in in BB7
They put Charley back in in BB8
gcmac
19-07-2014
Jon Tickle went back in too, but he wasn't able to win. (I don't think the other housemates knew that though).
They got away with Nikki and Jon going back in because they had another vote for them to go back in.
I think they could only put Danielle or Marlon back in, and even then probably just Danielle because if Marlon hadn't gone before her he may have gone instead of her, because the public didn't vote for their evictions.
MissPGC
19-07-2014
Originally Posted by snickypoo:
“It took ages to actually prise her out of the house on her first eviction! Davina had to go and fetch her out! Poor kid was terrified!”

LOOL I remember she was shaking like a leaf crying her eyes out
Groundhogal
19-07-2014
Originally Posted by snickypoo:
“It took ages to actually prise her out of the house on her first eviction! Davina had to go and fetch her out! Poor kid was terrified!”

A. Davina was heavily pregnant and had to walk all the way up the stairs to drag her down.
B. She wasn't a kid, she was a 24yo woman.
OldEnough
19-07-2014
Originally Posted by Groundhogal:
“A. Davina was heavily pregnant and had to walk all the way up the stairs to drag her down.
B. She wasn't a kid, she was a 24yo woman.”

A rather psychologically fragile young woman who probably shouldn't have been in the house in the first place.
I say this even though I despised her.
Groundhogal
19-07-2014
Originally Posted by gcmac:
“Jon Tickle went back in too, but he wasn't able to win. (I don't think the other housemates knew that though).
They got away with Nikki and Jon going back in because they had another vote for them to go back in.
I think they could only put Danielle or Marlon back in, and even then probably just Danielle because if Marlon hadn't gone before her he may have gone instead of her, because the public didn't vote for their evictions.”

But they didn't get away with Nikki. There was hell to pay for that manipulation. After that, they started giving phone vote profits to charity to encourage people to still keep voting. Many of them never trusted BB again after that.
Groundhogal
19-07-2014
Originally Posted by OldEnough:
“A rather psychologically fragile young woman who probably shouldn't have been in the house in the first place.
I say this even though I despised her.”

I can't argue with that. She wasn't the only one that year either. Shabaz was an accident waiting to happen, Lea wasn't the full shilling and Dawn? She had a code but no concept of what a microphone is.
performingmonk
19-07-2014
It's Danielle who should return because she was never evicted by the public.
CUP OF TEAAA!
19-07-2014
Bring back Danielle! Her eviction last night was a total joke.
InMyArms
19-07-2014
When they put Nikki back in after the viewers voted her out they got fined, the viewers were outraged and they admitted it was a mistake iirc. They wouldn't do that again. Bringing Danielle back would be fine.
OldEnough
19-07-2014
They don't need to bring ANYONE back in. They've got 10 HMs and 4 weeks left to go. They've already got a few too many anyway
danielleh
19-07-2014
Originally Posted by OldEnough:
“They don't need to bring ANYONE back in. They've got 10 HMs and 4 weeks left to go. They've already got a few too many anyway”

Yeah I don't think they'll bring anyone new or old in. Given the manner in which they were evicted though, if Kimberly is replaced it should be with Danielle and/or Marlon.

I can't see why they'd bring back Tamara. Maybe to fill the vacancy up Helen's... Even if they wanted to, she's too busy embarrassing herself on Twitter and trying to find discounted toothbrushes from Winston's house, I doubt they'd be able to find her.
Kyle123
19-07-2014
Originally Posted by Addisonian:
“Why on Earth would they put Tamara back in? Forgetting for a moment that people paid money to evict her, she was nothing more than a gurning dullard.”

I very much agree, but for whatever reason Emma and BOTS seem to love her. Im sure they won't put anyone back in, but hypothetically speaking she'd be a likely candidate if they dared go back down that route.
humbug333
19-07-2014
A stupid thread
Richard_Smith4
19-07-2014
Originally Posted by danielleh:
“Yeah I don't think they'll bring anyone new or old in. Given the manner in which they were evicted though, if Kimberly is replaced it should be with Danielle and/or Marlon.

I can't see why they'd bring back Tamara. Maybe to fill the vacancy up Helen's... Even if they wanted to, she's too busy embarrassing herself on Twitter and trying to find discounted toothbrushes from Winston's house, I doubt they'd be able to find her.”

Why all the hate on Tamara dont understand so she really likes the guy that obvious and acted a bit silly on Twitter aint we all acted dumb before when we like someone i sure have
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map