Whats the problem Bianca wasn't there and was out voted two to one anyway no more to it. As for the bit they gave there answers in the diary room maybe we'll see it. Also maybe they were called to the diary room separetely to give their choice. Whatever though it comes down to Bianca lost by two votes to one thats it.
Is it fair that the producers stepped in to save Ashleigh?
2 of 2
Originally Posted by Radical Joe:
“What? So scatty Bianca held the sway over the other two, and little Pav and Zoe were bullied into choosing Ashleigh who they both liked?
”
“What? So scatty Bianca held the sway over the other two, and little Pav and Zoe were bullied into choosing Ashleigh who they both liked?
”
Well according to Bianca they firstly all agreed on Kim but then once she left they agreed to pick Ashleigh .
Originally Posted by James Frederick:
“Maybe that is why they decided to get rid of her before the decision was made that did seem very least minute”
“Maybe that is why they decided to get rid of her before the decision was made that did seem very least minute”
I think they were expecting Pav to go and Bianca to stay tbh .
But Biannca did say Kim was their first choice, followed by Ashleigh. I like Ashleigh, but she wants to go and I believe her. Biannca couldn't understand why Danielle went, so Zoe and Pav must have changed their minds, or had it changed for them. Remember, Biannca told the others she was happy to leave the decision up to them.
Anyway wasn't Bianca slagging Danielle off most of the time she was in there. You could spin it other ways and think it's fishy that Bianca apparently suddenly wanted to keep Danielle in.
Originally Posted by 4troy7:
“Well according to Bianca they firstly all agreed on Kim but then once she left they agreed to pick Ashleigh .”
“Well according to Bianca they firstly all agreed on Kim but then once she left they agreed to pick Ashleigh .”
I know. I said the same on here. The point I'm making is that some here are content to believe Bianca when she claimed they agreed on Kim, but dismiss her when she says they then agreed on Ashleigh.
Why would they (the FMs concerned) do that, other than because the first part of what Bainca said supports their agenda, while the second part doesn't?
Originally Posted by jp761:
“Anyway wasn't Bianca slagging Danielle off most of the time she was in there. You could spin it other ways and think it's fishy that Bianca apparently suddenly wanted to keep Danielle in.”
“Anyway wasn't Bianca slagging Danielle off most of the time she was in there. You could spin it other ways and think it's fishy that Bianca apparently suddenly wanted to keep Danielle in.”
Good point. Also, as I and others have said, why would they want to save Kimberly, particularly to the point of arranging a fake illness (which some are still clinging onto even now...). If there was a fix it seems clear that it was to get Danielle evicted, and that had the newbies chosen two other HMs than Kimberly and Ashleigh initially we may have had similar 'interventions'.
Originally Posted by jp761:
“Anyway wasn't Bianca slagging Danielle off most of the time she was in there. You could spin it other ways and think it's fishy that Bianca apparently suddenly wanted to keep Danielle in.”
“Anyway wasn't Bianca slagging Danielle off most of the time she was in there. You could spin it other ways and think it's fishy that Bianca apparently suddenly wanted to keep Danielle in.”
Yep... Fishy, but not worth putting too much thought into. Biannca will likely have a different tale next time she's asked.
Originally Posted by basia:
“Yep... Fishy, but not worth putting too much thought into. Biannca will likely have a different tale next time she's asked.”
“
Yep... Fishy, but not worth putting too much thought into. Biannca will likely have a different tale next time she's asked.”
Oh yes she will, once the producers have had a word in her ear I am sure she will step back in line.
Originally Posted by tobi:
“Bianca wanted Ashleigh but the other two didn't”
“Bianca wanted Ashleigh but the other two didn't”
That's the truth of it.
2 of 2
