Originally Posted by Scarlet O'Hara:
“Im sorry but there IS something in Catholicism about Danielle's choice of profession. I agree with your opinion for what it's worth that her career should be irrelevant but the catholic church would not. It isn't about our opinion, it's about the principles which she herself, NOT US, has chosen to live by. The doctrine that she repeatedly judges OTHERS by.
I know many moderate Catholics who don't agree with the church's stance on, say, gay marriage or sex before marriage, and who don't believe in creationism. But they acknowledge their views contradict their church's teachings. Going by her views, Danielle isn't a moderate. That's the problem people are having. The hypocrisy between her staunch beliefs and what she does herself.
Danielle openly said she HAS to follow what the pope says. Well she doesnt. Not in her career and personal behaviour. That's not an opinion to debate. It's a fact based on catholic doctrine. But even that would be fine, except she hoisted herself by her own petard every time she used her religion to judge someone else. There's a very clear message in the bible about "let he who is without sin cast the first ”
I think you have made a number of assumptions in your post. In fact, you seem to be painting some of your opinion as fact. It isn't. I'm unclear if you are suggesting there is some sort of rule in Catholic teaching, thou must not be a glamour model....there isn't. But, assuming you mean it would be frowned on, as of course it likely would, so would many aspects of life in the modern world according to many religions...from divorce to foods people eat.
Her explaining her beliefs around not enjoying sexual talk etc are not invalidated by the fact she has done the work she has, or that some think her hypocritical as she is clearly, in their eyes, not a good enough Catholic to be making judgements about others. We all make judgements about other people. Danielle filtering her views partially through her religious beliefs, is not invalid because some people feel her glamour modelling in line with them, or appearing in lads mags, makes her a hypocrite.
You may consider Danielle's views immoderate, quite what is immoderate about the belief not to have sex before marriage I am unclear, it is no more or less valid a choice than having sex, surely. As for gay marriage, as I understand it, most of the larger religions hold similar views about marriage within their church. You make assumptions about the extent or level of Danielle's Catholicism, as if to suggest someone who follows the church's teaching fully, is therefore immoderate? Based on your view of what moderate Catholics are. Do you also feel this way about other religions?
I'm not sure which of Danielle's views you feel as so staunch, but I would genuinely be interested. In my view, her religion is her own personal choice, and the extent to which she follows the framework a matter for her. I don't feel I have any right to tell anyone of any religion what they should and shouldn't believe.
The hypocrisy you say she exhibits between her beliefs and what she does, are again, your opinion. Because, as far as I know, there are no perfect people. From adultery to divorce, people of all religions walk a line between their beliefs and the life they live, and that line is surely their own.And you feel that by making judgements on the personal decisions of others, different to her own, whilst modelling, she has done something wrong? I'm taking it this is all about Danielle's exaggerated distaste for sex talk, when she has modelled for saucy snaps, and her giving interviews for lads mags when professing to old fashioned views?That's it? Given so many of the judgements on this thread, it seems astounding to me that people feel they have any right to comment on Danielle's judgments..because she happens to be Catholic, and bases some of her views on her religion.
You also seemed surprised that there wasn't and isn't universal agreement with your view. I suspect you are wasting your time, yes, if you expect everyone to agree with you, just because you give your view...
As for casting stones...may I direct you to some of the comments on this thread...