• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Danielle: its just a job. no sorry.
<<
<
8 of 11
>>
>
COSIMA1
20-07-2014
Originally Posted by eddeva:
“I'll thank you to speak for yourself!
I'm a good, classy, roman catholic lady who is so devoted to her faith that I managed to go to a private roman catholic school in Cumbernauld even though there aren't any!
I would never get drunk, or have sex, or say 'penis', or get my bits out for cash ..... err hang on a minute ......



anywayz - a went tey finishin school so a talk more better thin all youz fukin weirdoz,

sure you did Danielle ”


And I got my profile package by taking some of that Imogen (who had sex with a footballer and got her into BB) and Danica (who had class, rinsed men on the web, posed with a horse and did Nutz mag shots and laaaaaaaangeeeeerayyyy modlin. which got her in
to BB)

I don't have their natural beauty so I had to come up with something special.......MY GOLDEN NUGGET.
COSIMA1
20-07-2014
Originally Posted by sula:
“I hope she makes oodles of filthy cash and disappears abroad to set up a home for abused donkeys.

Meanwhile, back at the end of my post number 157 I stated that I didn't expect you to agree and that we could just leave it there.”

Love the abused donkeys bit.

Wasn't there an old film about a nun and some donkeys? oh just remembered A Mule for Sister Sarah.

Last edited by COSIMA1 : 20-07-2014 at 03:45
sula
20-07-2014
Originally Posted by COSIMA1:
“Love the abused donkeys bit.

Wasn't there an old film about a nun and some donkeys? oh just remembered A Mule for Sister Sarah.
”



I might almost miss her, she was such a ridiculous spectacle.
Verityvee
20-07-2014
Originally Posted by sula:
“I hope she makes oodles of filthy cash and disappears abroad to set up a home for abused donkeys.

Meanwhile, back at the end of my post number 157 I stated that I didn't expect you to agree and that we could just leave it there.”

I think she is likely to do very well, so that is good to hear you wish her well.

It seems somewhere along the road you got the impression that when you spoke, others should simply obey. It's nice that you point out what you stated, how lovely for you. I'm sorry if I didn't obey your edict. Imagine that, someone making their own mind up...But, of course, what you decide, only applies to you.
COSIMA1
20-07-2014
Originally Posted by John_Clarkson:
“Exactly this. If she hadn't climbed on her high horse and gone on a one woman holier-than-thou campaign against swearing & sexually provocative behaviour, calling her fellow housemates things like 'vile' and 'disgusting' for doing less than she herself has done, then I'd not have such an issue with her. She looked down on her housemates, claiming to have the moral high ground, and expressed shock and outrage at their behaviour, when she herself has (by her own standards) done worse.

She wielded her religious belief like a weapon in that house, a club to beat others with.”

Good post....I like it
COSIMA1
20-07-2014
Originally Posted by sula:
“

I might almost miss her, she was such a ridiculous spectacle.”

Little whisper in your ear 'I think you-know-who is gonna keep adding to your posts regardless' tee hee
Verityvee
20-07-2014
Originally Posted by COSIMA1:
“Little whisper in your ear 'I think you-know-who is gonna keep adding to your posts regardless' tee hee”

Oh dear, am I infringing on your Danielle-fest. Shame, that.
COSIMA1
20-07-2014
Originally Posted by Verityvee:
“Oh dear, am I infringing on your Danielle-fest. Shame, that.”

Now I could come up with some witty retort to that......but I think I'll go and made a coffee instead.
COSIMA1
20-07-2014
Originally Posted by sula:
“Let me break this down: I do not see it as at all incomprehensible that someone could be a glamour model and hold the views she does or attend church.

Recognise those words? They're yours, but I agree. I totally agree that there need be no contradiction between going to church and operating within the sex industry at some level. It's not ideal but ,hey, I'm sure the Mafia still go to Mass etc.

That is not what my issue with Danielle is all about. If you still refuse to understand then I can only assume you are either willfully avoiding confronting the issue or, like Danielle, the truth is, for you, a rather malleable concept.”

Or just likes arguing?
COSIMA1
20-07-2014
Originally Posted by Verityvee:
“I think suggesting violence toward a housemate is totally unacceptable.”

She's not a housemate anymore!

And I didn't suggest violence towards her, I'd just do it.
COSIMA1
20-07-2014
Originally Posted by COSIMA1:
“She's not a housemate anymore!

And I didn't suggest violence towards her, I'd just do it.”

making a quote about my own quote......

Can I ask you Verity if saying you would do something violent to a housemate is really terribly unacceptable?

A yes or no answer would suffice
ShadowTillNow
20-07-2014
She just should have been honest! Owned it.

Humans contradict themselves all the time but it was silly for Danielle to try avoid being judged by holding back the details of her life and profession and then go on BB and judge the actions and choices of those she found herself living with. If you do that people are going to wonder why you feel you have the right to do so. What makes you so angelic?

So I think to say it's just a job is fine, but in the case of the religious "I just go by what the pope says" virgin vs. the cam girl/Nuts 10 Rude Questions centerfold I think some scrutiny is expected. It isn't a simple case of working at McDonald's and not liking Chicken Nuggets.

Of course Danielle owes the real world nothing, she can do what she wants and live how she pleases. But in the BB world, it's not a shock that people want an explanation, is it? And not everyone wants to judge her, some just want to understand her.

What I'm MOST annoyed with however is when Danielle was on BOTS and Vanessa was actually asking the tough questions about why Danielle was in the line of work she's in rather than something more suited to who she says she actually is, whatshername with the VV Brown hair roll shut it all down! I wanted to hear what she had to say and I think the question was justified.

Danielle put herself in this position, not us, knowing that the probing questions were out there lurking waiting to be answered.
theid
20-07-2014
Originally Posted by ShadowTillNow:
“
What I'm MOST annoyed with however is when Danielle was on BOTS and Vanessa was actually asking the tough questions about why Danielle was in the line of work she's in rather than something more suited to who she says she actually is, whatshername with the VV Brown hair roll shut it all down! I wanted to hear what she had to say and I think the question was justified.”


I'm not a Vanessa fan at all, but I agree with you here. And for the Rachel Morris to then say something about the programme, or Vanessa NOT being therapy, or a therapist and to continue to try and shout Vanessa down was ridiculous. Isn't this called "BB's bit on the psych"? Vanessa's query, which (for a change) was not asked in an unpleasant fashion was simple. Danielle could have chosen any profession (especially since her parents have spent a fortune, allegedly, on her private education and a finishing school!!!) and yet here she is in the sex industry. Don't say it's modelling. Ask the men who pay the bills whether there is any sex involved and I think we know what their answer will be. They're not contacting her for tips on removing stains from their shag pile.
molliepops
20-07-2014
I just suddenly realised when people are berating her for being a liar I see someone willing to play the game, now whether she played it well or not is a question but BB changed a while ago and I now expect and enjoy people who can play the game well and recognise it for what it is a game show.
She has admitted she was playing a game, I don't see that as abhorrent or hypocritical just something anyone can do when they enter the house.
yogacats
20-07-2014
She's got nothing to apologise for.
Scarlet O'Hara
20-07-2014
Originally Posted by Verityvee:
“On your first point, in my opinion, there is no excuse for that sort of language, but that isn't a matter of religion, it is a matter of human behaviour. I have also heard equally inappropriate comments about Danielle's religion, however. And similar comments whereby people make them and aren't aware many consider them unacceptable. As for her personal views on men being considered less...judged in sleeping around. In my opinion, they are, yet I don't agree with her views in this in any way, in terms of it being acceptable. But again, just because someone attends church doesn't mean they aren't human, or have their personal views.

As for your second point, I too have lost count on the many times this has been repeated. There is absolutely no issue, whatsoever, in my opinion, with Danielle working as a glamour model, and choosing not to have sex before marriage and attending church. It may be an odd career choice, yes, but I judge her no more than I would judge any glamour model, which would be not at all. I don't consider than because she is religious, or makes her decision on her sex life, that she has done anything wrong, no.

There is nothing to say glamour models can't be religious, just as nothing to say they can be. Nothing to say they can't choose not to have sex, in the same way there is nothing to say they can't choose to sleep with who they want. Because Danielle chose to work as a glamour model, doesn't mean she cannot hold her religious beliefs,or attend church.

There appear to be two fundamentally different viewpoints on the forum, those who feel she can work as a glamour model, yet still attend church and hold her views, and those who, I think, seem to feel that in so doing, she cannot hold her views, or shouldn't, and that she is some form of hypocrite. Everyone is entitled to their view.”

Im sorry but there IS something in Catholicism about Danielle's choice of profession. I agree with your opinion for what it's worth that her career should be irrelevant but the catholic church would not. It isn't about our opinion, it's about the principles which she herself, NOT US, has chosen to live by. The doctrine that she repeatedly judges OTHERS by.

I know many moderate Catholics who don't agree with the church's stance on, say, gay marriage or sex before marriage, and who don't believe in creationism. But they acknowledge their views contradict their church's teachings. Going by her views, Danielle isn't a moderate. That's the problem people are having. The hypocrisy between her staunch beliefs and what she does herself.

Danielle openly said she HAS to follow what the pope says. Well she doesnt. Not in her career and personal behaviour. That's not an opinion to debate. It's a fact based on catholic doctrine. But even that would be fine, except she hoisted herself by her own petard every time she used her religion to judge someone else. There's a very clear message in the bible about "let he who is without sin cast the first stone".


Originally Posted by sula:
“I cannot believe you can continue to be so obtuse as to not understand the difference between holding contradictory positions on the one hand and STANDING IN JUDGMENT on others on the other.

Nobody cares if she's a Catholic gone bad, except maybe her priest. It's the fact that she JUDGED others for less than she had done herself and LIED repeatedly.

It was Danielle herself who implied that some types of behaviour are incompatible with her high moral code, a code that is now revealed to be no more than a self-marketing scam. We saw the real danielle when she was cussing like the belligerent, back alley, low rent 'modd-elle' that she really is.”

Nail on head, thank you.

But even after you posted this, someone else came in to criticise people for judging Danielle's choice of career, totally missing the point. I suspect we're wasting our time.
BMLisa
20-07-2014
Ok I liked Danielle as a HM. I'm annoyed she went in a stupid twist where there was no vote and I think essentially deep down she's a really good and kind person.

I don't care a jot that she does what she does for a living, I don't care at all that she believes her job is compatible with her beliefs, that's up to her to decide, it's not my place to judge her belief system.

What I do have a problem with is her standing in judgement on the other HMs calling people slags, the faux outrage at so many things, which she has admitted to. I just don't think it was nice to guilt trip so many people and be the cause of a vast amount of the problems in the first few weeks based on a fake/constructed viewpoint.
ursula321
20-07-2014
Why would Danielle say sorry OP. So what if she has had sex or poses in her bra, if it was a game she was playing it's not really a big deal is it. It hasn't made a difference to my life so I don't feel she owes me an apology.
Scarlet O'Hara
20-07-2014
Originally Posted by theid:
“I'm not a Vanessa fan at all, but I agree with you here. And for the Rachel Morris to then say something about the programme, or Vanessa NOT being therapy, or a therapist and to continue to try and shout Vanessa down was ridiculous. Isn't this called "BB's bit on the psych"? Vanessa's query, which (for a change) was not asked in an unpleasant fashion was simple. Danielle could have chosen any profession (especially since her parents have spent a fortune, allegedly, on her private education and a finishing school!!!) and yet here she is in the sex industry. Don't say it's modelling. Ask the men who pay the bills whether there is any sex involved and I think we know what their answer will be. They're not contacting her for tips on removing stains from their shag pile.”

I agree. Rachel Morris was overstepping the mark when she acted like arbiter. Leave Rylan do that. There's a reason Danielle got booed and it wasn't because of her job or because of her faith. It's because 50% of what came out of her mouth was bullshit...whether that was the hypocritical nonsense on chastity, the hammy faux diary room rants acted so badly that I cringed for her, the "I'll go through her like a tonne of bricks" empty grandstanding when she left Ashleigh to face down Helen alone, the two-faced way she treated friends like Kim and Christopher, the tittle tattling between groups, the lies about not smoking or knowing what porn was, the outrage about unclassy behaviour, nudity or swearing from a topless webcam girl who swore like a docker, the disgraceful exploitation of her faith when she prayed out loud to be a success in BB, which no true catholic would ever do publicly.

The psyche show should have been unravelling the contradictions but Morris and Funke blew smoke up her arse. That said, I think they know she's a very weak, psychologically fragile person who'd disassemble if all that cognitive dissonance fell apart.
molliepops
20-07-2014
Originally Posted by Scarlet O'Hara:
“I agree. Rachel Morris was overstepping the mark when she acted like arbiter. Leave Rylan do that. There's a reason Danielle got booed and it wasn't because of her job or because of her faith. It's because 50% of what came out of her mouth was bullshit...whether that was the hypocritical nonsense on chastity, the hammy faux diary room rants acted so badly that I cringed for her, the "I'll go through her like a tonne of bricks" empty grandstanding when she left Ashleigh to face down Helen alone, the two-faced way she treated friends like Kim and Christopher, the tittle tattling between groups, the lies about not smoking or knowing what porn was, the outrage about unclassy behaviour, nudity or swearing from a topless webcam girl who swore like a docker, the disgraceful exploitation of her faith when she prayed out loud to be a success in BB, which no true catholic would ever do publicly.

The psyche show should have been unravelling the contradictions but Morris and Funke blew smoke up her arse. That said, I think they know she's a very weak, psychologically fragile person who'd disassemble if all that cognitive dissonance fell apart.”

If she was as bad as you say then BOTS is not the place to air it and Rylan is not the person to arbitrate anything.
Verityvee
20-07-2014
Originally Posted by Scarlet O'Hara:
“Im sorry but there IS something in Catholicism about Danielle's choice of profession. I agree with your opinion for what it's worth that her career should be irrelevant but the catholic church would not. It isn't about our opinion, it's about the principles which she herself, NOT US, has chosen to live by. The doctrine that she repeatedly judges OTHERS by.

I know many moderate Catholics who don't agree with the church's stance on, say, gay marriage or sex before marriage, and who don't believe in creationism. But they acknowledge their views contradict their church's teachings. Going by her views, Danielle isn't a moderate. That's the problem people are having. The hypocrisy between her staunch beliefs and what she does herself.

Danielle openly said she HAS to follow what the pope says. Well she doesnt. Not in her career and personal behaviour. That's not an opinion to debate. It's a fact based on catholic doctrine. But even that would be fine, except she hoisted herself by her own petard every time she used her religion to judge someone else. There's a very clear message in the bible about "let he who is without sin cast the first ”

I think you have made a number of assumptions in your post. In fact, you seem to be painting some of your opinion as fact. It isn't. I'm unclear if you are suggesting there is some sort of rule in Catholic teaching, thou must not be a glamour model....there isn't. But, assuming you mean it would be frowned on, as of course it likely would, so would many aspects of life in the modern world according to many religions...from divorce to foods people eat.

Her explaining her beliefs around not enjoying sexual talk etc are not invalidated by the fact she has done the work she has, or that some think her hypocritical as she is clearly, in their eyes, not a good enough Catholic to be making judgements about others. We all make judgements about other people. Danielle filtering her views partially through her religious beliefs, is not invalid because some people feel her glamour modelling in line with them, or appearing in lads mags, makes her a hypocrite.

You may consider Danielle's views immoderate, quite what is immoderate about the belief not to have sex before marriage I am unclear, it is no more or less valid a choice than having sex, surely. As for gay marriage, as I understand it, most of the larger religions hold similar views about marriage within their church. You make assumptions about the extent or level of Danielle's Catholicism, as if to suggest someone who follows the church's teaching fully, is therefore immoderate? Based on your view of what moderate Catholics are. Do you also feel this way about other religions?

I'm not sure which of Danielle's views you feel as so staunch, but I would genuinely be interested. In my view, her religion is her own personal choice, and the extent to which she follows the framework a matter for her. I don't feel I have any right to tell anyone of any religion what they should and shouldn't believe.

The hypocrisy you say she exhibits between her beliefs and what she does, are again, your opinion. Because, as far as I know, there are no perfect people. From adultery to divorce, people of all religions walk a line between their beliefs and the life they live, and that line is surely their own.And you feel that by making judgements on the personal decisions of others, different to her own, whilst modelling, she has done something wrong? I'm taking it this is all about Danielle's exaggerated distaste for sex talk, when she has modelled for saucy snaps, and her giving interviews for lads mags when professing to old fashioned views?That's it? Given so many of the judgements on this thread, it seems astounding to me that people feel they have any right to comment on Danielle's judgments..because she happens to be Catholic, and bases some of her views on her religion.

You also seemed surprised that there wasn't and isn't universal agreement with your view. I suspect you are wasting your time, yes, if you expect everyone to agree with you, just because you give your view...

As for casting stones...may I direct you to some of the comments on this thread...
John_Clarkson
20-07-2014
Originally Posted by Verityvee:
“I think you have made a number of assumptions in your post. In fact, you seem to be painting some of your opinion as fact. It isn't. I'm unclear if you are suggesting there is some sort of rule in Catholic teaching, thou must not be a glamour model....there isn't. But, assuming you mean it would be frowned on, as of course it likely would, so would many aspects of life in the modern world according to many religions...from divorce to foods people eat.

Her explaining her beliefs around not enjoying sexual talk etc are not invalidated by the fact she has done the work she has, or that some think her hypocritical as she is clearly, in their eyes, not a good enough Catholic to be making judgements about others. We all make judgements about other people. Danielle filtering her views partially through her religious beliefs, is not invalid because some people feel her glamour modelling in line with them, or appearing in lads mags, makes her a hypocrite.

You may consider Danielle's views immoderate, quite what is immoderate about the belief not to have sex before marriage I am unclear, it is no more or less valid a choice than having sex, surely. As for gay marriage, as I understand it, most of the larger religions hold similar views about marriage within their church. You make assumptions about the extent or level of Danielle's Catholicism, as if to suggest someone who follows the church's teaching fully, is therefore immoderate? Based on your view of what moderate Catholics are. Do you also feel this way about other religions?

I'm not sure which of Danielle's views you feel as so staunch, but I would genuinely be interested. In my view, her religion is her own personal choice, and the extent to which she follows the framework a matter for her. I don't feel I have any right to tell anyone of any religion what they should and shouldn't believe.

The hypocrisy you say she exhibits between her beliefs and what she does, are again, your opinion. Because, as far as I know, there are no perfect people. From adultery to divorce, people of all religions walk a line between their beliefs and the life they live, and that line is surely their own.And you feel that by making judgements on the personal decisions of others, different to her own, whilst modelling, she has done something wrong? I'm taking it this is all about Danielle's exaggerated distaste for sex talk, when she has modelled for saucy snaps, and her giving interviews for lads mags when professing to old fashioned views?That's it? Given so many of the judgements on this thread, it seems astounding to me that people feel they have any right to comment on Danielle's judgments..because she happens to be Catholic, and bases some of her views on her religion.

You also seemed surprised that there wasn't and isn't universal agreement with your view. I suspect you are wasting your time, yes, if you expect everyone to agree with you, just because you give your view...

As for casting stones...may I direct you to some of the comments on this thread...”

In this post, you have repeatedly misrepresented the views that other have expressed, and then dismissed that misrepresented view, as a means of dismissing the actual views that have been expressed. If you are not being obtuse, you are being disingenuous. I have no further time for you.
OldEnough
20-07-2014
Danielle's distaste for sexual talk seems to cover only the sexual talk which she isn't being paid for.
Virgil Tracy
20-07-2014
Originally Posted by Scarlet O'Hara:
“In the sermon on the mount, Jesus said "I say to you that every one who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart." There are abundant other teachings that define adultery, chastity, etc. Crucially, while we liberals only look harshly on the married person, the church takes a dim view of both parties.”

well I don't remember Danielle looking lustfully at a woman either .

you claimed she broke the 6th commandment , now you're digging round in scripture to try and get out but you're just digging yourself in deeper .

.
Scarlet O'Hara
20-07-2014
Originally Posted by John_Clarkson:
“In this post, you have repeatedly misrepresented the views that other have expressed, and then dismissed that misrepresented view, as a means of dismissing the actual views that have been expressed. If you are not being obtuse, you are being disingenuous. I have no further time for you.”

Thanks. I agree the other post was so riddled with irrelevant points about other religions, wrong assumptions about Catholicism and a distortion/misrepresentation of what I was getting at, I wouldn't know where to start. So like you, I'm out.

Originally Posted by Virgil Tracy:
“well I don't remember Danielle looking lustfully at a woman either .

you claimed she broke the 6th commandment , now you're digging round in scripture to try and get out but you're just digging yourself in deeper .

.”

Ay? I was raised Catholic, that stuff is very accessible to us. I merely used the 6th commandment as one small example of her departure with church teachings. (I.e. Unless she vets the relationship status of her webcam customers and every guy who perves over her picture, she'd be 'the adulteress' in literal terms). But really it wasn't the best example for me to use when the catechism itself defines chastity, fornication, adultery, pornography, etc.

Anyway, as I said above, I'm done. Debating with certain Danielle fans is like nitpicking over an atom when there's a meteor in the room.
<<
<
8 of 11
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map