|
||||||||
Danielle: its just a job. no sorry. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#201 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 9,275
|
Quote:
Debating with certain Danielle fans is like nitpicking over an atom when there's a meteor in the room.
I might even have to steal it and use it myself.
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#202 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 442
|
vegetarians working in meat serving restaurants (check)
socialists working for big capitalist firms (check) atheists working in religious based companies (check).... i believe only ACTIVISTS take these kinds of stances. people have to work and live. |
|
|
|
|
|
#203 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 775
|
Quote:
It's not the job that's the problem. It's her calling others slags/disgusting/cheap and no class that is the problem. She's just been on facebook BBUK page with Q&A and is STILL commenting on others.....she replied to one that she thought what Kim and Steven did was cheap and disgusting.
![]() LOVED what someone wrote back....'as cheap and disgusting as the pics of your lady on the web?'![]() She came, she tried and she failed. Now she needs to deal with it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#204 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 9,275
|
Quote:
No one, especially those who watch BB, would ever judge anyone for having posed for Lads' Mags, done webcam "chats", posing nude, etc, etc,.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#205 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Manchester, England
Posts: 19,941
|
Quote:
Sorry but i can't buy that.
Would a Vegan work in a butchers ? Or an anti capitalist work for a bank ? or an Environmentalist work for a logging firm or oil company? If you have strong "morals" or "beliefs" you wouldn't do a job that goes totally against them. Would you ? |
|
|
|
|
|
#206 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 24,017
|
Quote:
Thanks.
I agree the other post was so riddled with irrelevant points about other religions, wrong assumptions about Catholicism and a distortion/misrepresentation of what I was getting at, I wouldn't know where to start. So like you, I'm out.Ay? I was raised Catholic, that stuff is very accessible to us. I merely used the 6th commandment as one small example of her departure with church teachings. (I.e. Unless she vets the relationship status of her webcam customers and every guy who perves over her picture, she'd be 'the adulteress' in literal terms). But really it wasn't the best example for me to use when the catechism itself defines chastity, fornication, adultery, pornography, etc.Anyway, as I said above, I'm done. Debating with certain Danielle fans is like nitpicking over an atom when there's a meteor in the room. by that logic anytime a guy "perves" over a picture of a woman then that woman is an adulteress , just absurd . you got it wrong , just admit it . . |
|
|
|
|
|
#207 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,709
|
Quote:
she should be going to debutant balls to find a nice husband and bake bread for life, her scones would be the envy of West Scotland
![]() ...or is that just derogatory ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#208 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,586
|
Quote:
vegetarians working in meat serving restaurants (check)
socialists working for big capitalist firms (check) atheists working in religious based companies (check).... i believe only ACTIVISTS take these kinds of stances. people have to work and live. vegetarians working in meat serving restaurants (check) and snarfing the odd burger down while lying to everyone at home about being a veggie and gagging when others eat meat. socialists working for big capitalist firms (check) and calling their coworkers "disgusting" for working there atheists working in religious based companies (check)....and crying in the toilets because they object to all the God talk, before going quietly off to the prayer room at lunchtime to say a quick Rosary. |
|
|
|
|
|
#209 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 364
|
Quote:
Your analogy needs a bit of tinkering IMO....
vegetarians working in meat serving restaurants (check) and snarfing the odd burger down while lying to everyone at home about being a veggie and gagging when others eat meat. socialists working for big capitalist firms (check) and calling their coworkers "disgusting" for working there atheists working in religious based companies (check)....and crying in the toilets because they object to all the God talk, before going quietly off to the prayer room at lunchtime to say a quick Rosary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#210 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 775
|
Quote:
Maybe if you tried quoting in context then you wouldn't need to say "Ummmm". Mind you, you may not have a quote at all, so I guess it's up to you. In general, I find folk on this forum to be pretty non-judgemental but you're entitled to your opinion and, if you don't fall in with the majority, then fair enough. I think people have a problem with the hypocrisy of Danielle's "I haven't seen a penis - in fact, don't even mention it to me or God will not forgive me.... EVER!" attitude as opposed to what ANother housemate may or may not do a little false. But each to their own. |
|
|
|
|
|
#211 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 26,363
|
Quote:
I just suddenly realised when people are berating her for being a liar I see someone willing to play the game, now whether she played it well or not is a question but BB changed a while ago and I now expect and enjoy people who can play the game well and recognise it for what it is a game show.
She has admitted she was playing a game, I don't see that as abhorrent or hypocritical just something anyone can do when they enter the house. |
|
|
|
|
|
#212 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,709
|
Quote:
how did she go against her beliefs ?
. She has performed for her punters via her webcam involving stripping off to just her knickers, but in the house has claimed that all she does is talk about her horse-riding, religious beliefs and her church adding that there's nothing 'dodgy' about her webcam work. She denied ever performing in her underwear for her customers adding that the only time she is filmed or pictured in her underwear is whilst advertising brands purely as part of her professional modelling work - which was a blatant lie. She has never attended a 'finishing school' - which is completely obvious from her behaviour and inarticulacy. She claimed in the house to be a virgin who does not believe in sex before marriage and yet, has given interviews in men's magazines whereby she described her favourite sexual position and that her next ambition is to join the mile high club. She is a total hypocrite, a fantasist and a liar with delusions of grandeur. She really is a rather pitiful character.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#213 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 243
|
Quote:
In this post, you have repeatedly misrepresented the views that other have expressed, and then dismissed that misrepresented view, as a means of dismissing the actual views that have been expressed. If you are not being obtuse, you are being disingenuous. I have no further time for you.
Actually I replied directly taking the time to address all points the FM in question raised, but if you aren't able to see that....perhaps it is you who should consider the accusations you so freely levy at others, may well be about yourself... |
|
|
|
|
|
#214 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 18,808
|
Quote:
Have you not been watching the show and seen the pornographic photographs of her online?
She strips off to her knickers and performs for punters via her webcam, but in the house has claimed that all she does is talk about her horse-riding etc. and there's nothing 'dodgy' about it. She denied ever performing in her underwear for her customers adding that the only time she is filmed or pictured in her underwear is whilst advertising brands purely as part of her professional modelling work - which was a blatant lie. She has never attended a 'finishing school' - which is completely obvious from her behaviour and inarticulacy. She has also given interviews in which she describes her favourite sexual position and that her next ambition is to join the mile high club. She is a total hypocrite, a fantasist and a liar with delusions of grandeur. She really is a rather pitiful character. )
|
|
|
|
|
|
#215 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 243
|
Quote:
no , she isn't an adulteress in literal terms . And how is she supposed to vet the marital status of everyone who looks at her pictures ?
by that logic anytime a guy "perves" over a picture of a woman then that woman is an adulteress , just absurd . you got it wrong , just admit it . . There are different views on the forum, and looks like we will have to disagree. But some people do seem to get very angered by that, and fall back on insults toward those who don't share their view. |
|
|
|
|
|
#216 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: woking
Posts: 21,660
|
Quote:
Have you not been watching the show and seen the pornographic photographs of her online?
She has performed for her punters via her webcam involving stripping off to just her knickers, but in the house has claimed that all she does is talk about her horse-riding, religious beliefs and her church adding that there's nothing 'dodgy' about her webcam work. She denied ever performing in her underwear for her customers adding that the only time she is filmed or pictured in her underwear is whilst advertising brands purely as part of her professional modelling work - which was a blatant lie. She has never attended a 'finishing school' - which is completely obvious from her behaviour and inarticulacy. She claimed in the house to be a virginwho does not believe in sex before marriageand yet, has given interviews in men's magazines whereby she described her favourite sexual position and that her next ambition is to join the mile high club. She is a total hypocrite, a fantasist and a liar with delusions of grandeur. She really is a rather pitiful character. ![]() My religion doesn't allow me to do the things many people do I try not to judge though, it's up to everyone to decide on their own moral code, Danielle's code was different to mine but I don't judge her for that. If she found it difficult not to judge then that is up to her, for most of us we are not perfect we struggle with our religion everyday. I think her struggle will be o sop being so judgemental but I can't dislike her for that it took me years to get the point I am at with mine she just needs a bit more maturity to get there too I think. |
|
|
|
|
|
#217 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 11,183
|
Quote:
What I am finding strange about all this is how judgemental some people are, I thought as a Christian in GD I was considered judgemental but gosh some here just out judge me by a mile !
|
|
|
|
|
|
#218 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 243
|
Quote:
Have you not been watching the show and seen the pornographic photographs of her online?
She has performed for her punters via her webcam involving stripping off to just her knickers, but in the house has claimed that all she does is talk about her horse-riding, religious beliefs and her church adding that there's nothing 'dodgy' about her webcam work. She denied ever performing in her underwear for her customers adding that the only time she is filmed or pictured in her underwear is whilst advertising brands purely as part of her professional modelling work - which was a blatant lie. She has never attended a 'finishing school' - which is completely obvious from her behaviour and inarticulacy. She claimed in the house to be a virgin who does not believe in sex before marriage and yet, has given interviews in men's magazines whereby she described her favourite sexual position and that her next ambition is to join the mile high club. She is a total hypocrite, a fantasist and a liar with delusions of grandeur. She really is a rather pitiful character. ![]() She has worked on webcam as per her documentary. At worse, topless. Neither of those have any impact on her religion. Sure, there is a contrast between her career choice, and her beliefs, we all know that. She wasn't completely honest about her glamour work, I guess she was aware of the contrast and the judgement in my provoke from others. But still, just a glamour model, and doesn't affect her going to church. Unlike you, I have no idea for sure whether she did or didn't attend a finishing school. And, I most certainly have no idea about her sex life. But lads mags written by, I suspect, writers in house with content written to sell, does not mean she doesn't hold her religious beliefs. So at worst, as far as we know, she has lied about her work. This in the context of her appearing on a game show, and in line with all the other behaviour in the house. Big deal. How exactly she goes against her beliefs in the examples you relay, I don't know. She glamour models..not an ideal profession for her, perhaps. She may have told some lies, or exaggerated. Not perfect behaviour, sure, but I haven't seen any perfect behaviour ever, never mind in the house. |
|
|
|
|
|
#219 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,586
|
Quote:
no , she isn't an adulteress in literal terms . And how is she supposed to vet the marital status of everyone who looks at her pictures ?
by that logic anytime a guy "perves" over a picture of a woman then that woman is an adulteress , just absurd . you got it wrong , just admit it . . Here's an easy-to-understand extract: "The viewing of pornography (and, indeed, looking at other human beings in a deliberately lustful fashion and dwelling on those thoughts and encouraging them) is rightly condemned following the instructions of Christ in Matthew 5:28 which equates deliberately lustful thoughts with adultery." Now, there's some debate about whether she herself would be called an "adulterer" (strict interpretations of the catechism say yes she is, others would say she tempts/facilitates it) but either way, her line of work encourages men to desire her and desire by married men is adultery. In addition, "Immodest dress is condemned, and is defined as dressing in a manner likely to arouse sexual interest or with the intention of arousing sexual interest in a situation where this is inappropriate (generally speaking, where it will arouse sexual interest in individuals other than the person's spouse). The Church condemns this as tempting other individuals into sin. While this does not absolve the sinner of his guilt, it means that the tempter shares in some of that guilt." In Catholicism, porn (soft or otherwise, encouraging sexual fantasy, displaying body for sexual purposes) masturbation, or indeed any lust-related activity outside marriage is considered a sin. The spiritual messages underneath these teachings are more complex than I can be bothered going into here, but anyone who's been raised catholic, done RE, Sunday School, etc (e.g. me or Danielle) will know that it ultimately has to do with causing separation from god. Knock yourself out researching all this online. But don't tell me I'm wrong when you haven't done your own homework. |
|
|
|
|
|
#220 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 243
|
Quote:
But Danielle is the one who is judgemental - thats what all the fuss is about. Being hypocritical.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#221 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,154
|
Oh God, sex and religion, what a no no.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#222 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 243
|
Quote:
This is getting irritating. Ive just said she can't vet her clients. Therefore, some could well be married, indeed probably are. And adultery in Catholicism is ANY activity which threatens the marital covenant including desire.
Here's an easy-to-understand extract: "The viewing of pornography (and, indeed, looking at other human beings in a deliberately lustful fashion and dwelling on those thoughts and encouraging them) is rightly condemned following the instructions of Christ in Matthew 5:28 which equates deliberately lustful thoughts with adultery." Now, there's some debate about whether she herself would be called an "adulterer" (strict interpretations of the catechism say yes) but her line of work requires men to desire her and desire is adultery. In addition, "Immodest dress is condemned, and is defined as dressing in a manner likely to arouse sexual interest or with the intention of arousing sexual interest in a situation where this is inappropriate (generally speaking, where it will arouse sexual interest in individuals other than the person's spouse). The Church condemns this as tempting other individuals into sin. While this does not absolve the sinner of his guilt, it means that the tempter shares in some of that guilt." In Catholicism, porn (soft or otherwise, encouraging sexual fantasy, displaying body for sexual purposes) masturbation, or indeed any lust-related activity outside marriage is considered a sin. The spiritual messages underneath these teachings are more complex than I can be bothered going into here, but anyone who's been raised catholic, done RE, Sunday School, etc (e.g. me or Danielle) will know that it ultimately has to do with causing separation from god. Knock yourself out researching all this online. But don't tell me I'm wrong when you haven't done your own homework. So, all of this is about you saying she isn't a good enough Catholic, in your eyes, to hold the views she does? Do you do this with all religions, comparing to the people in your life? Perhaps there should be a tick box or marking system, where she gets points taken away. As all you seem to be saying is she isn't a good enough Catholic. For someone who professes to near expert status in their understanding of Catholicism, may I ask if her church would exclude her for the transgressions you suggest, or welcome her as a flawed individual? Flawed, like the rest of humanity. |
|
|
|
|
|
#223 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,154
|
How I look at it is that is is a question of degree.
From lads mags to web cams, to phone sex, Internet sex call girls, prostitue so and the porno industry. I wouldn't like my girls even to do what Danielle does but would much prefer that to any of the other mentioned previously. A question of degrees but who would want any of their family members to do this. It is where it leads to also. Dirty old men photographers, telling young girls lies which lead into all sorts of degradation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#224 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 243
|
Quote:
How I look at it is that is is a question of degree.
From lads mags to web cams, to phone sex, Internet sex call girls, prostitue so and the porno industry. I wouldn't like my girls even to do what Danielle does but would much prefer that to any of the other mentioned previously. A question of degrees but who would want any of their family members to do this. It is where it leads to also. Dirty old men photographers, telling young girls lies which lead into all sorts of degradation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#225 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 24,017
|
Quote:
This is getting irritating. Ive just said she can't vet her clients. Therefore, some could well be married, indeed probably are. And adultery in Catholicism is ANY activity which threatens the marital covenant including desire.
Here's an easy-to-understand extract: "The viewing of pornography (and, indeed, looking at other human beings in a deliberately lustful fashion and dwelling on those thoughts and encouraging them) is rightly condemned following the instructions of Christ in Matthew 5:28 which equates deliberately lustful thoughts with adultery." Now, there's some debate about whether she herself would be called an "adulterer" (strict interpretations of the catechism say yes she is, others would say she tempts/facilitates it) but either way, her line of work encourages men to desire her and desire by married men is adultery. In addition, "Immodest dress is condemned, and is defined as dressing in a manner likely to arouse sexual interest or with the intention of arousing sexual interest in a situation where this is inappropriate (generally speaking, where it will arouse sexual interest in individuals other than the person's spouse). The Church condemns this as tempting other individuals into sin. While this does not absolve the sinner of his guilt, it means that the tempter shares in some of that guilt." In Catholicism, porn (soft or otherwise, encouraging sexual fantasy, displaying body for sexual purposes) masturbation, or indeed any lust-related activity outside marriage is considered a sin. The spiritual messages underneath these teachings are more complex than I can be bothered going into here, but anyone who's been raised catholic, done RE, Sunday School, etc (e.g. me or Danielle) will know that it ultimately has to do with causing separation from god. Knock yourself out researching all this online. But don't tell me I'm wrong when you haven't done your own homework. . |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:31.



I might even have to steal it and use it myself.


I agree the other post was so riddled with irrelevant points about other religions, wrong assumptions about Catholicism and a distortion/misrepresentation of what I was getting at, I wouldn't know where to start. So like you, I'm out.
I was raised Catholic, that stuff is very accessible to us. I merely used the 6th commandment as one small example of her departure with church teachings. (I.e. Unless she vets the relationship status of her webcam customers and every guy who perves over her picture, she'd be 'the adulteress' in literal terms). But really it wasn't the best example for me to use when the catechism itself defines chastity, fornication, adultery, pornography, etc.
...or is that just derogatory ?