They talk about them all the time and there is never a punishment, so I assume its allowed?

I guess because they rarely nominate the talk is hypothetical. But in previous years even hypothetical noms talk was punished.

probably not but Big Brother has broken every rule so far so why not. Lets gets Jack Nicholson in the house or even Trevor Brooking . They have effed up everything else so far. complete amateurs

There are no rules any more. They used to be on the web site. Now producers make up the rules as they go along, eg we never know the basis for HMs being up for eviction. Sometimes its the two or more with the most votes.e. Sometimes it's the three or more. And sometimes it's anyone with 2 or more nominations. The producers wait to see who is nominated before deciding who will face the public vote. That's on the odd occasions when there is a public vote. These spur of the moment rule changes are known as twists, and Emma gets very excited by them and imagines that the viewers do too.

Very True...

The rule is that their are no rules. Big brother can let people vote and spend their hard earned money but it means cock-all to the final result each week.

Must be, I don't think we've seen anyone be reprimanded for nomination talk - this series. I've no idea why they are still calling this Big Brother.

The lack of nominations in this series has spoiled the format