Originally Posted by Scrovegni:
“If Helen had been given 'immunity from being nominated' BB of course could remove it for a week like they did with Jale. However Helen was given a 'pass to the final', if this was removed for a week and she was evicted it would not be a 'pass to the final'.”
This is all very true, of course, but BB can chop and change whenever they want.
If they wanted to take that pass from her they would. They make the rules.
If they had no intention of ever removing the pass, I have to wonder why they bothered to warn her about her behaviour towards others.
What would have happened if she hadn't sufficiently modified her behaviour?
Sanction after sanction, but never eviction just because she had a pass? Anyone else would be out if they kept up that behaviour.
It's disingenuous of BB to act as though the pass, once given, cannot be rescinded, almost as if their hands are tied legally, when we all know they can just change their mds if the mood strikes or it would cause a stir that resulted in better ratings.