My suspicion is that 'Sarsha', is in on the whole thing. He's a pimp basically.

Sasha seemed a arse if I'm honest, she's well rid of him.

Steven love him or hate him will look after her.

As Jessy J would say.....Its all about the money money money

WHAAAAAAT?

SO MUCH wrong with what you just said!

So because she doesn't feel the same way as you do about her relationship she deserves a man to be violent against her????

And as for 'prick tease'... the bullshit premise of being a prick tease implies that if a woman acts a certain way and then doesn't have sex, she is teasing (which is an actual crime /sarcasm) because she has failed to fulfil her obligation.

NO-ONE is ever obligated to have sex.

Apart from that, she actually had sex so she was hardly a tease was she?

You need to sort your head out!

People do buy them though which is why we get these stories in OK after every big brother 'romance'

I don't think she is rid though. I foresee a reunion right around the time she starts selling stories on how controlling Steven is and how she couldn't handle it anymore.

He said Steven will find out soon it's not genuine and I truly believe he will, right after the mags are done and dusted.

I hope the gruesome couple are on with Iain Lee and Rylan come Saturday

So she is not just acting like a whore, but she is also a fame-whore? I am glad she is gone and hopefully Steven will be this week. Although it would be funny to keep him in, just to wind them both up. BB should set him a task when he is not evicted. Mark has to dress up like a baby and Steven has to look after his every need. If he says the word "me" it incurs a fail. It would freak him out, cos he would think kimbot really is preggers after all. Oh and BB should say that he has to refer to Mark as Sasha for the duration of the task.

As long as she behaves.

It is not live. Yes I know. I am a BB junkie and have been to so many of the shows it is ridiculous. Have been on BBBOTS in the days when it actually WAS live. But that interview was not completely edited. Perhaps a couple of takes maybe, but the audience would see that and they are highly judgemental. I know quite a lot of people in that audience, and Karen was there. They would not take it lightly being screwed over by lots of takes.

Did people seriously expect Kim to slag off Steven?? Just because DS posters dont like Steven it doesnt mean Kim has to agree.

If she slagged him off I would question her Law training.

If it's all about the money- bloody hell how much do mag interviews pay BB no marks these days? It wasn't a fortune in it's heyday and nowadays I would have thought it's slim pickings.

Anyway, I thought that Kim was/is a successful model? Why would a few grand make a difference to her? Perhaps I'm judging her by my own standards, I'd need Russian Oligarch level of riches to be even linked to Steven (and even then ..).

I'm starting to think that they're actually well suited, she's as weird and creepy as he is.

No, that will come one later when she needs to get rid.

This is the girl who is tweeting OK mag about 'Steverly' she has a product to promote - their relationship. Slagging him off wouldn't be financially beneficial.

Erm. My head is perfectly sorted honey. I was not saying that she deserves violence. I was saying that if she messed around with Steven and he got angry then she deserves that. And she is being a prick tease if she is with him for magazine deals.

You need to get your head sorted out. If you want to read such things into what someone says then you have the problem not me. I was the victim of terrible and severe domestic violence for over 8 years that left me physically disabled. I know what it is like. She is talking about letting a man control her and how much she likes him telling her what to do. There is so much wrong with what she said on camera. If she allows Steven to act in a controlling way and encourages it, then if things get out of hand she has enabled him. That is just a simple truth. So wind your neck in and stop judging me.

I completely agree.Steven is an upgrade from Sacha.I dont blame her.She met a better man.

They do pay money, it may not be a fortune but it still entails her getting paid and staying in the public eye. HMs said in the house that Kim is skint and in there for her career. She spent yesterday tweeting pics of herself to OK mag with the word 'Steverly' written on it, so yes clearly she does want the attention of the mags.

They're moving in to a property in Chelsea. Steven said so.

Can't see many mags selling well with those two knobs on the front cover..

Out of every answer i have seen this sums it up perfectly

But she cant slag him in the interview we have just seen.That is what this thread is about.OP wanted to her to slag him tonight.

I would be less likely to buy a magazine with Steven on the cover.

And we know that how? We don't actually know anything about sacha.

Ewwww,can you imagine..yuk.

They are welcome to each other. Wish I'd never heard of/seen either of them to be honest

Forget the mag deals. I'm having a hard time wrapping my head around the fact that there are enough people who even CARE about Steven and Kimberley to actually buy the articles. I'd probably thumb through--have a look at the pictures---shake my head--and put the mags back on the stand.