Originally Posted by sahmraw:
“Erm. My head is perfectly sorted honey. I was not saying that she deserves violence. I was saying that if she messed around with Steven and he got angry then she deserves that. And she is being a prick tease if she is with him for magazine deals.
You need to get your head sorted out. If you want to read such things into what someone says then you have the problem not me. I was the victim of terrible and severe domestic violence for over 8 years that left me physically disabled. I know what it is like. She is talking about letting a man control her and how much she likes him telling her what to do. There is so much wrong with what she said on camera. If she allows Steven to act in a controlling way and encourages it, then if things get out of hand she has enabled him. That is just a simple truth. So wind your neck in and stop judging me.”
So you're comparing Steven to a physically abusive man and then saying Kimberly DESERVES what she gets when he gets mad and you're not implying she deserves someone being violent with her? OK THEN! *rolls eyes*
Again...NO-ONE is a prick tease - EVER! There is NEVER an obligation to have sex!
Giving someone the benefit of the doubt is enabling them to be controlling and abusive and therefore you deserve all you get by staying with them?
IF he got abusive with her, she would be the victim, it isn't her responsibility to see that he acts like a decent human being and doesn't abuse her ffs
You obviously didn't learn that from your experience eh?
My necks staying out mate and I'm judging you just as harshly as you are judging Kimberly!
I couldn't give a toss about either Steven or Kimberly, but your attitude stinks, and your attitude is the kind of attitude that encourages abuse, not Kimberly's.
SMFH!