• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Danielle's webcam vid
<<
<
3 of 5
>>
>
Cheddarcakes
24-07-2014
Damn she is fit in that vid

She has a fit bod easily best in the house this year. Nice curves and a teeny lil bit of flubber, just enough to ripple when she is getting it
emptybox
24-07-2014
Originally Posted by Rafferty:
“She 'owned up' to trying to have a good girl persona in the house but she still refuted any sexual work. Something like 'lingerie modelling for 'brands''

So unless I got in wrong she hasn't so far admitted that she HAS done SEXUAL webcam work for the boys. Nearest she got about the stills of this vid is saying ''oh that must be a private one to one'' but I don't know where I read or heard that.”

You read it in the Daily Star, when they showed her the pictures from that vid.
And her quote was
"I've not seen these pictures, but maybe it is something private that leaked out."

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/tv/big-br...ed-webcam-chat

I see they've fuzzed out the fake nude one, so they were fooled as well.
MACTOWIN
24-07-2014
Perhaps the CPS should be called in I mean I have never seen a topless video before.
AOTB
24-07-2014
Originally Posted by viewer123:
“How the hell is that vid "dodgy" ”

Bewbs.
AOTB
24-07-2014
Originally Posted by Cheddarcakes:
“Damn she is fit in that vid

She has a fit bod easily best in the house this year. Nice curves and a teeny lil bit of flubber, just enough to ripple when she is getting it”

Hmmm...
SpiritedAway
24-07-2014
Gangnam Style for a topless dance!

All that clomping around on the wood floors like a young filly. And then rubbing her bum against that woolen jacket, can you imagine the static electricity?!
Cheddarcakes
24-07-2014
Originally Posted by AOTB:
“Hmmm...”



Kim doesn't do it for moi she is like a walking corpse and Helen is a bit y'know
redex
24-07-2014
OMG! That video was so.....boring!

Did finishing school take away her sense of rhythm or what?
AOTB
24-07-2014
Originally Posted by Cheddarcakes:
“

Kim doesn't do it for moi she is like a walking corpse and Helen is a bit y'know”

To each their own my good man. To each their own.
Karen_Annanina
24-07-2014
There's nothing unusual or virtuous about keeping her undies on. If you ever watch "Babestation" you'll see that all girls keep their undies on if they want to move about and get into various poses. They only go completely naked if they're going to stay still and pose side-on. So Danielle is no better than a typical Babestation girl. They all admit that they are there to titillate men and help them to masturbate.
Rafferty
24-07-2014
Error
emptybox
24-07-2014
Originally Posted by Karen_Annanina:
“There's nothing unusual or virtuous about keeping her undies on. If you ever watch "Babestation" you'll see that all girls keep their undies on if they want to move about and get into various poses. They only go completely naked if they're going to stay still and pose side-on. So Danielle is no better than a typical Babestation girl. They all admit that they are there to titillate men and help them to masturbate.”

I don't think anybody is claiming it's unusual or virtuous that she kept her undies on?
It's just that so many were claiming that she took her undies off, on the basis of a badly photo shopped image.

The Babestation ones only keep their undies on because they are not allowed to show anything on Freeview TV.
They don't keep them on when they are on the web based stations.
Penny Crayon
24-07-2014
I know she's not fat by any means so I really have no idea why I just couldn't look at her without this image popping into my head.

http://bigboysclub.com.au/homer-simp...-see-this.html
jp761
24-07-2014
Yep i'll stick to redtube
Scarlett Berry
24-07-2014
I find her faux posh accent and rotten taste in underwear more alarming than the fibs she told.
Karen_Annanina
24-07-2014
How about her talking sh*t about Zoe and Pav for revenge? As a Christian isn't she supposed to turn the other cheek and forgive them?

Everything about her is false.
Penny Crayon
24-07-2014
Originally Posted by Karen_Annanina:
“How about her talking sh*t about Zoe and Pav for revenge? As a Christian isn't she supposed to turn the other cheek and forgive them?

Everything about her is false.”

She was turning her cheeks in that vid.
Karen_Annanina
24-07-2014
Originally Posted by emptybox:
“I don't think anybody is claiming it's unusual or virtuous that she kept her undies on?
It's just that so many were claiming that she took her undies off, on the basis of a badly photo shopped image.

The Babestation ones only keep their undies on because they are not allowed to show anything on Freeview TV.
They don't keep them on when they are on the web based stations.”

Not arguing with you, but on a point of information, Babestation girls DO go naked, so long as they don't show their "private parts". Babestation is licensed in Holland, and doesn't fall under Ofcom rules. Now, if you take XPanded, it DOES fall under Ofcom rules and even their webcam girls are not naked. Don't ask me how I know this!
AOTB
24-07-2014
Originally Posted by Penny Crayon:
“She was turning her cheeks in that vid.”

Very good.

Originally Posted by Penny Crayon:
“I know she's not fat by any means so I really have no idea why I just couldn't look at her without this image popping into my head.

http://bigboysclub.com.au/homer-simp...-see-this.html”

dee-rec
24-07-2014
Originally Posted by Scarlett Berry:
“I find her faux posh accent and rotten taste in underwear more alarming than the fibs she told.”

Totally agree, what kind of convoluted accent is that she is putting on and as for the grey undies good god. Surely no one could call that galumphing around banging chairs in any way sexy??
Robbie_Craig
24-07-2014
If you really think that's dodgy you must have led a very sheltered life..you see worse on tv these day's ...try Brighton beach in this weather they wear a lot less
AOTB
24-07-2014
Originally Posted by Robbie_Craig:
“If you really think that's dodgy you must have led a very sheltered life..you see worse on tv these day's ...try Brighton beach in this weather they wear a lot less”

The fact you see a pair of boobs isn't the issue being discussed though, and misses the point. Come on now, this is pretty straight forward I thought, no?

The 'dodgy' bit under discussion is Dannielle's assertion that she is a good catholic girl who is not the type to get her bazingas out or allow non sheltered types (like yourself perhaps, who knows) to bash one out over.

The very tame and certainly not erotic or in any way 'shocking' video therefore is not the thing here that is 'dodgy'. (well it's a bit dodgy but not in an 'OMG boobs, I'm outraged' kinda way).

As an infamous, pretend I'm not ginger, contact lens wearer might say-

Comprende?
purplesky
24-07-2014
It feels so wrong that she has gone up in my estimation after seeing that vid. I am flagellating as we speak. Ouch.

It makes me wish she hadn't constructed a weird fake persona, because she might have been a much better housemate with her real personality.

Ah well, another one bites the dust.
AOTB
24-07-2014
Originally Posted by purplesky:
“It feels so wrong

I am flagellating as we speak.

another one bites the dust.”

Is that a euphemism
SpiritedAway
24-07-2014
Originally Posted by dee-rec:
“Totally agree, what kind of convoluted accent is that she is putting on and as for the grey undies good god. Surely no one could call that galumphing around banging chairs in any way sexy??”

It's "wholesome" underwear. The ugly granny panties come complete with chastity belt and are the source of her virtue.
<<
<
3 of 5
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map