Originally Posted by AOTB:
“Is that a euphemism
”
“Is that a euphemism
”
Dear Lord.
My flagellation has reached 30 strokes per minute.
Danielle's webcam vid
4 of 5
So she didn't take of her nickers. 
just 1 of many maybe in another video
It was to a live audience not 1to1, after her break she may have gotten tokens for her to get out the dildo.
just 1 of many maybe in another video
It was to a live audience not 1to1, after her break she may have gotten tokens for her to get out the dildo.
Originally Posted by dee-rec:
“Totally agree, what kind of convoluted accent is that she is putting on and as for the grey undies good god. Surely no one could call that galumphing around banging chairs in any way sexy??”
“Totally agree, what kind of convoluted accent is that she is putting on and as for the grey undies good god. Surely no one could call that galumphing around banging chairs in any way sexy??”
I'm unable to mach up the stills which means some are from the second Video part 2 !!!
I think she did take her knickers off after the break.
Did you get the vid off davy99 on pornhub OP ?? your link has been removed on that site now!
I think she did take her knickers off after the break.
Did you get the vid off davy99 on pornhub OP ?? your link has been removed on that site now!
Originally Posted by alias alias:
“I'm unable to mach up the stills which means some are from the second Video part 2 !!!
I think she did take her knickers off after the break.
Did you get the vid off davy99 on pornhub OP ?? your link has been removed on that site now!”
“I'm unable to mach up the stills which means some are from the second Video part 2 !!!
I think she did take her knickers off after the break.
Did you get the vid off davy99 on pornhub OP ?? your link has been removed on that site now!”
All of the stills can be matched to that video.
There is no "part 2", unless you can find it and post it.
The disproved 'nude' pic was made from a still at 21 mins 14 sec.
But you knew all that?
Originally Posted by emptybox:
“All of the stills can be matched to that video.
There is no "part 2", unless you can find it and post it.
The disproved 'nude' pic was made from a still at 21 mins 14 sec.
But you knew all that?”
“All of the stills can be matched to that video.
There is no "part 2", unless you can find it and post it.
The disproved 'nude' pic was made from a still at 21 mins 14 sec.
But you knew all that?
”
You do seem to have spent an inordinate amount of time studying and mapping out this video frame by frame
Just saying
Originally Posted by Penny Crayon:
“You do seem to have spent an inordinate amount of time studying and mapping out this video frame by frame
Just saying”
“You do seem to have spent an inordinate amount of time studying and mapping out this video frame by frame
Just saying
”
If people had accepted it when I said that pic had been photo-shopped, then I wouldn't have bothered.
But there were some still dancing around chanting "foo foo, lady, foo foo" in a slightly demented fashion.
So obviously, as I've been given the opportunity, I'm going to make it my business to prove them wrong.
Originally Posted by FusionFury:
“She will be back in the saddle before long.
She was bragging about it on BBOTS last night.”
“She will be back in the saddle before long.
She was bragging about it on BBOTS last night.”
What did she say?
I don't remember her saying anything?
Originally Posted by Rosie50:
“The vids have been deleted”
“The vids have been deleted”
The Dailymotion one is still there for me.
At the end of the day she is going online with a "gimmick" and being paid for it whilst getting her clothes off in order for men/women to obtain sexual gratification!!!!!!!
She is prostituting herself!!!!!!! END OF!!!
She can make all the excuses she likes but in by eyes its worse because she has lied about it.
She is prostituting herself!!!!!!! END OF!!!
She can make all the excuses she likes but in by eyes its worse because she has lied about it.
Originally Posted by emptybox:
“If people had accepted it when I said that pic had been photo-shopped, then I wouldn't have bothered.
But there were some still dancing around chanting "foo foo, lady, foo foo" in a slightly demented fashion.
So obviously, as I've been given the opportunity, I'm going to make it my business to prove them wrong.”
“If people had accepted it when I said that pic had been photo-shopped, then I wouldn't have bothered.
But there were some still dancing around chanting "foo foo, lady, foo foo" in a slightly demented fashion.
So obviously, as I've been given the opportunity, I'm going to make it my business to prove them wrong.
”
You are right about 21:00 You studied it well
I wasn't trying to fool anyone i just didn't spot it.
It's not been photo-shopped thought it just happened to look nude i could take 3 screens and they would look nude with the gray pants blurring and going up the crack
http://i.imgur.com/YrDXods.png
Originally Posted by alias alias:
“You are right about 21:00 You studied it well I wasn't trying to fool anyone i just didn't spot it.
It's not been photo-shopped thought it just happened to look nude i could take 3 screens and they would look nude with the gray pants blurring and going up the crack
http://i.imgur.com/YrDXods.png”
“You are right about 21:00 You studied it well
I wasn't trying to fool anyone i just didn't spot it.It's not been photo-shopped thought it just happened to look nude i could take 3 screens and they would look nude with the gray pants blurring and going up the crack
http://i.imgur.com/YrDXods.png”
My eyes....!
Originally Posted by qwertyell:
“I don't know if it's worth posting this, as everyone already knows the prudish "I'm a lady" act is a load of rubbish, and in any case Danielle's BB journey is over (unless they put her back in).
But I've finally found the video to go with the previously posted (and laughably disputed) caps that appeared the other week.
Not Safe For Work (obviously)
http://www.pornhub.com/view_video.ph...key=1235701135
or
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x22...iellebb_people
Like I say, I'm not sure it adds much to a debate that's already over, but it is what it is.
Check it out before it's deleted, I guess.”
“I don't know if it's worth posting this, as everyone already knows the prudish "I'm a lady" act is a load of rubbish, and in any case Danielle's BB journey is over (unless they put her back in).
But I've finally found the video to go with the previously posted (and laughably disputed) caps that appeared the other week.
Not Safe For Work (obviously)
http://www.pornhub.com/view_video.ph...key=1235701135
or
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x22...iellebb_people
Like I say, I'm not sure it adds much to a debate that's already over, but it is what it is.
Check it out before it's deleted, I guess.”
Lol finally found the video, bet you had to trawl through loads to find it.
Originally Posted by alias alias:
“You are right about 21:00 You studied it well I wasn't trying to fool anyone i just didn't spot it.
It's not been photo-shopped thought it just happened to look nude i could take 3 screens and they would look nude with the gray pants blurring and going up the crack
http://i.imgur.com/YrDXods.png”
“You are right about 21:00 You studied it well
I wasn't trying to fool anyone i just didn't spot it.It's not been photo-shopped thought it just happened to look nude i could take 3 screens and they would look nude with the gray pants blurring and going up the crack
http://i.imgur.com/YrDXods.png”
I still think the one on the left looks like it's been smudged to disguise the line of the panties, but it might just be because it's a lower resolution/quality than your one on the right?
The underneath colouring just seems to be a trick of the lighting though.
I'll guess that danielle's had it removed from Dailymotion, who else would? The webcam site on request from Danielle?
removed at the request of its copyright holder, titulaires de droits.
french IT copy law firm?
removed at the request of its copyright holder, titulaires de droits.
french IT copy law firm?
Not seen the vid, but I expect a mini Streisand effect if it has been removed.
Originally Posted by R82n8:
“Not seen the vid, but I expect a mini Streisand effect if it has been removed.”
“Not seen the vid, but I expect a mini Streisand effect if it has been removed.”
Thing is, it was the set of pictures that did the damage to her.
The video actually proved that the pictures were tamer than had been reported, by the Star etc.
Wonder if that means Danielle or her management read this thread?
Or has the video been talked about elsewhere?
Whoever actually paid for that webcam show must have felt very cheated, it was so boring and not sexy in the slightest.
4 of 5
