|
||||||||
The Digital Spy Apprentice Series 4 - Task Four Boardroom |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#51 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 13,451
|
...Team Aptitude.
Well done, despite a few issues we did feel that what you produced fit in much more with what we wanted to see from this task. Congratulations, you may leave the boardroom. Team Inspired, unfortunately a good pitch has not saved you, we felt that we could not see your film working in the British film industry and considering how that was the main point of the task, we therefore cannot award you the win. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#52 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7,587
|
Well done, Steve and Aptitude.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 3,020
|
Thank you Lord Sugar and good luck Team Inspired.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 7,374
|
Well done Steve and Aptitude. Though I do think something has been overlooked by everyone that was stated as being the most important point on Lord Sugar's brief.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: My DJ Studio
Posts: 27,072
|
Thank you Lord Sugar, we'll try our best to iron out those issues for the next task.
![]() Good luck team Inspired. |
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 154
|
This is heart breaking.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Limbo
Posts: 1,263
|
Thank you Lord Sugar
Commiserations Team Inspired good luck to you all
|
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 13,451
|
I realise this is pretty hard without your project manager being here, but we will be continuing with this boardroom, and will have the final boardroom now with you three.
What do you think went wrong? |
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The United Kingdom
Posts: 8,407
|
Quote:
Well done Steve and Aptitude. Though I do think something has been overlooked by everyone that was stated as being the most important point on Lord Sugar's brief.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 7,374
|
Quote:
This does make it seem like the idea was decided before an industry was even considered, and the industry chosen was just an afterthought. Do you think this was a good way to go around the task? Whilst the idea itself is as always of paramount importance, I did make it clear in the brief just how important it fitting into your chosen industry was... I did say repeatedly how paramount the genre aspect of the task was and so we should build it from the genre up so start with the most popular genre like sci-fi but that did not work with my colleagues. As a compromise to my colleagues I accepted the idea, and made it a point quite strongly to chose a relevant genre at least. So I settled on a period drama like Downton Abbey or a thriller and to make some adjustments so that Shadi has a bit more creative license and he can make the characters unrealistic to this time for the period drama but relevant in that while a thriller would allow him to experiment even more and do whatever he wanted as realism need not apply, and I ended up having an argument with both my colleages (and even Zak) and they refused to listen to my ideas. I do feel Shadi although creatively speaking very good was being stubborn in this way in trying to make the idea work. |
|
|
|
|
|
#61 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7,587
|
Quote:
I realise this is pretty hard without your project manager being here, but we will be continuing with this boardroom, and will have the final boardroom now with you three. What do you think went wrong? |
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 13,451
|
Quote:
I'm going to expand on this slightly more as I feel this was ^ up here was the reason we lost this task and also not the reason I should be fired at the same time.
I did say repeatedly how paramount the genre aspect of the task was and so we should build it from the genre up so start with the most popular genre like sci-fi but that did not work with my colleagues. As a compromise to my colleagues I accepted the idea, and made it a point quite strongly to chose a relevant genre at least. So I settled on a period drama like Downton Abbey or a thriller and to make some adjustments so that Shadi has a bit more creative license and he can make the characters unrealistic to this time for the period drama but relevant in that while a thriller would allow him to experiment even more and do whatever he wanted as realism need not apply, and I ended up having an argument with both my colleages (and even Zak) and they refused to listen to my ideas. I do feel Shadi although creatively speaking very good was being stubborn in this way in trying to make the idea work. I did hear complaints of this from my advisor as well. I do understand that the idea for the film derived from Shadi's pre existing idea for a novel. Shadi, in hindsight do you think it might have been a better idea to have come up with a new idea for this task? As David stated earlier, using your own idea seems to have made the task a bit too personal for you and has resulted you in being accused of being 'stubborn' in regards to making changes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 7,374
|
Quote:
And what is that?
Especially with an action based animation with lots of colour adjustment and animation needed Aptitude's idea would be so expensive. As a person who did the budget for our team and did a lot of research into it, and who people generally supported, this budget does not seem realistic at all. That's all I'll say about that but LSA did state it was a very important point in the brief. |
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The United Kingdom
Posts: 8,407
|
Quote:
I'm going to expand on this slightly more as I feel this was ^ up here was the reason we lost this task and also not the reason I should be fired at the same time.
I did say repeatedly how paramount the genre aspect of the task was and so we should build it from the genre up so start with the most popular genre like sci-fi but that did not work with my colleagues. As a compromise to my colleagues I accepted the idea, and made it a point quite strongly to chose a relevant genre at least. So I settled on a period drama like Downton Abbey or a thriller and to make some adjustments so that Shadi has a bit more creative license and he can make the characters unrealistic to this time for the period drama but relevant in that while a thriller would allow him to experiment even more and do whatever he wanted as realism need not apply, and I ended up having an argument with both my colleages (and even Zak) and they refused to listen to my ideas. I do feel Shadi although creatively speaking very good was being stubborn in this way in trying to make the idea work. You were also the only person to offer any other serious suggestions. Do you think you could have pushed harder to install another idea or change your team mate's minds? |
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The United Kingdom
Posts: 8,407
|
Quote:
The budget - no one commented that budgets for independently produced animation films cost SUBSTANTIALLY more than £2.5 million and the reason lies in Post-production with special effects. Corpse Bride and Tales of Desperaux are similar animated films made by an independent film house yet their budgets were in the region of £40million and £60million.
Especially with an action based animation with lots of colour adjustment and animation needed Aptitude's idea would be so expensive. As a person who did the budget for our team and did a lot of research into it, and who people generally supported, this budget does not seem realistic at all. That's all I'll say about that but LSA did state it was a very important point in the brief. |
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 154
|
You know the thing is, I try to give my all every task. And when I saw what this task was about, I knew that I had to just give my best idea. When Zak started the brainstorming discussion, I laid out my idea. He loved it. Roxie loved it. George loved it. And there wasn't any other full-fledged idea that we can choose from. Zak saw a pretty good screenplay was almost ready and that bulk of the task was gone 15 minutes in. Fitting that into the british film scene was not my idea, nor my intention as I had started suggesting American actresses known in hollywood, and some American TV stars. I had never brought up the British scene. As for the genre, this screen play is a drama, it can not be turned into anything else. A period piece, as Roxie suggested, would still be a drama. And this could not have been turned into an action movie because it wasn't. If anyone wants to jump on the bandwagon of the idea, or if someone felt it was flawed, we had 2 full days, why wasn't there any alternative idea to substitute for mine? Why didn't Zak ask for someone else to come up with idea? Why didn't say Roxie suggest a screen play? I did not force anyone to use my idea but seeing how this has been a screenplay that I had developed for quite some time, I was against major changes. And George would agree with me when I say that most of the changes Roxie suggested to the screenplay were not on par with what I had laid out anyways.
I admit that I was a bit resilient at times to change some things, but I allowed for many adjustments. Annette was turned upside down and I didn't mind. The society was not chosen by me either. And Roxie came to up with several points and asked me to add them which I whole-heartedly did. But if Roxie or anyone wanted an action more or a period drama, they should've come up with the script accordingly, instead of trying to alter mine to fit the genre when it wouldn't have worked. |
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 7,374
|
Quote:
I did notice that you were the person who most wanted to make changes to the plot, and I actually think that some of your suggested changes (e.g. making it a period drama) could have mitigated some of the more ridiculous aspects of your plot, of which there were many.
You were also the only person to offer any other serious suggestions. Do you think you could have pushed harder to install another idea or change your team mate's minds? I feel I was trying really hard to make this whole idea work as a British drama - many of the ideas in making it as realistic as possible were done by me like Annette's difficulty in conceiving children, alcoholism, abuse etc. to make us at least address current issues. And I did badger the points in and was assertive once again on these areas, so I do feel I have tried my best. |
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7,587
|
I think I was probably thinking too much about making a great film, and not enough about winning the task itself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 13,451
|
Quote:
You know the thing is, I try to give my all every task. And when I saw what this task was about, I knew that I had to just give my best idea. When Zak started the brainstorming discussion, I laid out my idea. He loved it. Roxie loved it. George loved it. And there wasn't any other full-fledged idea that we can choose from. Zak saw a pretty good screenplay was almost ready and that bulk of the task was gone 15 minutes in. Fitting that into the british film scene was not my idea, nor my intention as I had started suggesting American actresses known in hollywood, and some American TV stars. I had never brought up the British scene. As for the genre, this screen play is a drama, it can not be turned into anything else. A period piece, as Roxie suggested, would still be a drama. And this could not have been turned into an action movie because it wasn't. If anyone wants to jump on the bandwagon of the idea, or if someone felt it was flawed, we had 2 full days, why wasn't there any alternative idea to substitute for mine? Why didn't Zak ask for someone else to come up with idea? Why didn't say Roxie suggest a screen play? I did not force anyone to use my idea but seeing how this has been a screenplay that I had developed for quite some time, I was against major changes. And George would agree with me when I say that most of the changes Roxie suggested to the screenplay were not on par with what I had laid out anyways.
I admit that I was a bit resilient at times to change some things, but I allowed for many adjustments. Annette was turned upside down and I didn't mind. The society was not chosen by me either. And Roxie came to up with several points and asked me to add them which I whole-heartedly did. But if Roxie or anyone wanted an action more or a period drama, they should've come up with the script accordingly, instead of trying to alter mine to fit the genre when it wouldn't have worked. It does seem like an issue was that there was a lack of alternative ideas offered. Obviously this was a managerial fault, but do you think you could have collectively come up with more ideas?
I'll also reiterate what I said earlier - it does seem a little like you put so much focus on the film idea and less on the specific industry you would be trying to make the film in. Do you think it might have been better to have considered the industry at an earlier point, instead of trying to fit the idea into a specific industry after establishing the idea? |
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 13,451
|
Quote:
I think I was probably thinking too much about making a great film, and not enough about winning the task itself.
I would agree that this was probably an issue. In future task briefs should be looked at more closely to determine what we really want from a task.
Another question for you George, from what I gather you were the main factor in choosing the British film industry. As this is what essentially lost you the task, do you think you are to blame for the failure of the task? |
|
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7,587
|
Quote:
It does seem like an issue was that there was a lack of alternative ideas offered. Obviously this was a managerial fault, but do you think you could have collectively come up with more ideas? I'll also reiterate what I said earlier - it does seem a little like you put so much focus on the film idea and less on the specific industry you would be trying to make the film in. Do you think it might have been better to have considered the industry at an earlier point, instead of trying to fit the idea into a specific industry after establishing the idea? |
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7,587
|
Quote:
I would agree that this was probably an issue. In future task briefs should be looked at more closely to determine what we really want from a task. Another question for you George, from what I gather you were the main factor in choosing the British film industry. As this is what essentially lost you the task, do you think you are to blame for the failure of the task? |
|
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 13,451
|
Quote:
I suggested UK independent right from the start - I can't remember if it was before or after Shadi suggested his idea, but I wanted to go with that because I thought it would be gritty, realistic and promote the UK film industry. It was suggested, mainly by Roxie, that the script would work better with a different industry, but generally it was decided that we'd go with UK. I accept that I possibly could have done better not to push that idea.
Apologies for keeping on asking you questions, but I just want to establish one more thing. Was there a particular reason you went with the British film industry, and did you do any further research after making your decision? The leading directors in the drama field of British cinema are people like Mike Leigh and Ken Loach, who make films that are pretty much as realistic and true to life as you can get for a non fiction film. I think Shadi's plot idea was imaginative and clearly a lot of thought had gone into it, but the biggest issue was that there were several aspects that just seemed like they wouldn't happen in real life. Whilst this may be okay for another industry, I feel it is totally wrong for the British film industry.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7,587
|
Quote:
Apologies for keeping on asking you questions, but I just want to establish one more thing. Was there a particular reason you went with the British film industry, and did you do any further research after making your decision? The leading directors in the drama field of British cinema are people like Mike Leigh and Ken Loach, who make films that are pretty much as realistic and true to life as you can get for a non fiction film. I think Shadi's plot idea was imaginative and clearly a lot of thought had gone into it, but the biggest issue was that there were several aspects that just seemed like they wouldn't happen in real life. Whilst this may be okay for another industry, I feel it is totally wrong for the British film industry. As for your comments about the directors, we wanted an up-and-coming British director. I found a list of such directors - I quite liked the look of Tom Kingsley, but Roxie was really keen on Andrea Arnold and when she explained her reasoning, Shadi and I were really on board. So there was some research that went into it, but maybe we could have done with a bit more. |
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 154
|
Well you know me, when I can, I contribute to tasks that I'm not even assigned to. This task I was too pressured with tomorrow's critical Final exam and some personal issues yet I still gave my all. But I just felt that no one tried to come up with a different script, yet mine is being blamed for not fitting their expectations of what it should have been. I changed it as much as I could, but if the theme and the genre they had in mind was so drastically different than the one I had employed in my movie, wouldn't have been easier to suggest an alternative screenplay rather than try to drastically adjust mine?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:43.





