Originally Posted by BabelBrook: “BB seem to be doing as much as possible to save Steven over Pav. Even on BOTS last night when all the panel said Pav would be evicted Emma asked the audience if they agreed. Quite a few said no, to which Emma said so everyone agrees then before quickly moving on.”
Yes, I thought all that was quite telling of BB's intentions. I'm shocked at Mishkov not sticking with Steven, but Emma's ignoring most of the audience was pretty blatant.
Originally Posted by icefall: “I thought that was threatening and I bet Pav gets evicted tomorrow. I will be in utter despair if that happens having to hear Stevens smug deluded comments till the final probably, at this rate.”
His comments were deeply vitriolic. Helen and Ash's faces lit up with absolute joy at the image and anticipation of him delivering his threat.
It was actually Stevens misplaced anger and pain towards Helen (from the quotes task), and towards the eviction audience ( because of the deeply humiliating chants) that he was channelling towards the most isolated HM. Thereby in one act displaying two classic bully traits: cowardice and attacking the weak.
Originally Posted by eva_prior: “His comments were deeply vitriolic.
Thereby in one act displaying two classic bully traits: cowardice and attacking the weak.”
What are you on about.....
'If Pav looks at me again'
How is that vitriolic or threatening....
It could just have easily meant . 'I am going to have words with him'
Originally Posted by eva_prior: “His comments were deeply vitriolic. Helen and Ash's faces lit up with absolute joy at the image and anticipation of him delivering his threat.
It was actually Stevens misplaced anger and pain towards Helen (from the quotes task), and towards the eviction audience ( because of the deeply humiliating chants) that he was channelling towards the most isolated HM. Thereby in one act displaying two classic bully traits: cowardice and attacking the weak.”
I think that's a bit of a stretch tbh. If anything, I think they were trying not to laugh at his histrionics
Been resisting commenting on this, but in my gut it just doesn't feel right..
He seems to have found another level - Pav, unlike the rest who observe, is guilty for what other reason....
It troubles me that BB has not dealt with this, but if they do they only highlight it.
Whatever the outcome, I cannot now see Steven as anything but an embarassment to us all. The sooner he is gone the better.
Originally Posted by Neontiger81: “Pav is probably, like most of us, wondering how many boogers one man can have up his nose.”
A copious amount warranting constant attention - but then what do you expect from a man who is significant in every way. Shame his dear mum didn't explain what handkerchiefs/tissues are for.
Originally Posted by Heavenly: “Why does that not surprise me.”
Because the track record of Labour, Tory and Lib Dem is so bad that the mere idea of voting for them is completely ridiculous? Even though UKIP aren't that great, there is really little to no alternative
Originally Posted by eva_prior: “His comments were deeply vitriolic. Helen and Ash's faces lit up with absolute joy at the image and anticipation of him delivering his threat.
It was actually Stevens misplaced anger and pain towards Helen (from the quotes task), and towards the eviction audience ( because of the deeply humiliating chants) that he was channelling towards the most isolated HM. Thereby in one act displaying two classic bully traits: cowardice and attacking the weak.”
Originally Posted by eva_prior: “It was actually Stevens misplaced anger and pain towards Helen (from the quotes task), and towards the eviction audience ( because of the deeply humiliating chants) that he was channelling towards the most isolated HM. Thereby in one act displaying two classic bully traits: cowardice and attacking the weak.”
Him and Kimbo will be reunited tonight and as I don't watch BOTs or read the Star...its goodbye forever.
Originally Posted by dtorre: “Because the track record of Labour, Tory and Lib Dem is so bad that the mere idea of voting for them is completely ridiculous? Even though UKIP aren't that great, there is really little to no alternative”
If you think UKIP are great, fair enough, but I would never vote for a party that I thought weren't great, just because I wasn't keen on the others.
Originally Posted by snickypoo: “At least while he's picking on Pav, he's leaving his nose alone! ”
You saying the owner and managing director of a huge corporate business, a world traveller, the countries he HASN'T visited to be counted on the fingers of one hand, can't multi-task????