Thanks for that.

This was my two-penneths worth.

You should not have singled out certain HMs, either target them all or non at all.
No outside Info.
NO FREE RIDE TO THE FINAL.
You got the best bunch of HMs for years, but have spoilt it with too much interfering.
This series could have been one of the best.

Thanks, done with gusto!

Veri, as others have explained it's a pop-up you'll never see with ad blocking software.
Richie has provided a direct link to the survey above if you'll kindly scroll up.

Edit - it's right there in the posts above and below this reply. Hope this helps.

Thanks for the link, I couldn't get it before either.

I just said don't bother next time as it didn't live up to the hype.

Wish I'd read this thread first though, cos I would've said something about not messing with noms and the public vote.

xx

what did some of you write out of interest?

For message to producer's I simply put 'Don't'.

For reason it made me watch less I put that by having a public vote it remains a game that house mates can play, whereas removing that from them with no warning simply makes it a game of chance. Personally if I were a house mate and knew i'd have no control whatsoever I'd have opted for a shot on deal or no deal. Big Brother may change the rules at any time but not the entire premise of the show without warning just for shits and giggles and a 2 minute ratings spike.

yes it really is quite amazing how the producers have destroyed a show which had potential.

they could have just sat back and left it with the housemates nominating normally every week, three housemates with most votes up for eviction, public vote to SAVE (my personal preference) .

it really would have been that simple.

but no they ruined it, and needed a silly 'armageddon' week to try and undo all the damage, and ended up losing FOUR housemates in the process, and gaining 2 complete bores. you could not make it up

'Here are your P45s'

Told them Marlon's eviction was a joke wrapped in a travesty and Danielle was cheated. Public vote not producers decisions

I filled it in, but I also think you could be right.
They probably won't even read any and file them in the bin

I too didn't hold back. I tried to get across that they HAVE to stop messing with the nomination process. Will they listen? Maybe not ;- (

I also couldn't find the survey and I'm a complete ****!

so what is the point of the exercise in the first place ?

Well I've suggested that the producer of it should be publically flogged and the rest of the production team sacked on the spot.

I do hope they listen to this very constructive criticism.

Drop the eviction and put on producer flogging instead.

https://www.demographix.com/surveys/8SL2-YMAS/PH3RASEH/

There you go that is the url that the link for the c5 survey takes you to. Give them hell.

Thanks for the link .Hope they they heed of the public's views.

i want to fill it out again, i wasnt harsh enough ! will it trace my IP? i dont want them to know im the same person

Basically told them to let the viewers have the bloody vote. Said the evictions of Marlon and Danielle were jokes and I don't even like them. It robbed the viewers the chance of voting them out.

Similar for me. I told them I was watching less because the viewers should always be in control of the show and I didn't like how it was turning into BBUSA. Especially as it costs 50p a vote and many people spend a small fortune on it. My advice to the producers was they shouldn't have bothered because it was a massive anti-climax.

I told them to leave the public voting the way it was because without it I wouldn't bother watching BB. And I said I was disgusted the way Marlon and especially Danielle were ejected and that Danielle shouldn't have had to go just because Kimberley was ill. And I added that I don't even believe Kimberley was ill.

Thank you for that

At the end of the day, the real Armageddon happened when Beyonce dropped her surprise album. December 13th, never forget.

I fought my urges and gave them constructive feedback, rather than just insult them. Won't make a blind bit of difference but we can only try.

they did 4 last year that's why I've become so negative and look at the complete mess this year. Instead of asking Core Questions they load each one so they skirt around what they already know. According to Channel 5 they were going to get the true and honest views of "what people want". that's going to be impossible when the Questions are worded in such a way it actually avoids a lot of issues from the very start.

I went to town about no public vote and lack of live feed. Hope someone with some sense listens