She might've been the first out if this had been a normal series. The only reason she stands out is because of the confidence her pass to the final has given her. She hasn't had to compete in the same way as the other housemates to avoid nomination, she hasn't had to ingratiate herself with the other housemates etc...

She hasn't been a normal Big Brother contestant because she isn't a contestant (until the final night).

#helentowin

It's a sad fact, that some people admire foul mouthed bullies, like Helen.

Apart from the comment about Ashleigh I agree completely.

No one..NO ONE....Who was immune from Nomination and eviction from day 1 is a deserving winner..NO ONE

*edit* No one..NO ONE....Who was immune from Nomination and eviction from day 2 is a deserving winner..NO ONE

What about if it was day 2?

She won't even be considered a true BB finalist...there will be and astesk by her name with a explanation that she was granted a free pass

"on Day 2, she was given an automatic pass to the final as a reward by Power Housemate Pauline" it is already there

LoL oh well that is quiet different then

She doesn't even deserve to be in the house - without that pass to the final she would have been out in the first couple of weeks. As it is she has come across as an unpleasant person for the most part who has been lucky enough to stick around long enough for the more likeable aspects of her personality to come out at times - which some similar housemates in early series never got the chance to do.

I still think I would have enjoyed the series a lot more if she wasn't there, and I think a lot of her fellow housemates would have too. She has dominated the series for the wrong reasons

What's wrong with Ash?
She's both smart and beautiful!!

Exactly. I would LOL my knockers off if the chief villain won this year. The forum would implode!

She's certainly done that. I want Christopher to win - failing that I'd like to see Helen as the winner. She's been a good value HM - and .....................................I know I'll get slated for this but I do believe she has been on the biggest journey in there. She went in aggressive from the off shouting her mouth off at the drop of a hat and bad mouthing people. I think that is how she's lived her life.

In the house she has been forced to stick around and see the consequences of her behaviour on people - she's seen them get upset - she's seen them avoiding her. I think she will re think how she treats people once she's out of the house.

It would be hilarious. In a farcical way.

Too many Rooney lovers, and too many, Hellen haters, for her to win

Gone are the days when the goodies triumphed over the baddies. The nasty people tend to win, that's why the world is in the state it's in.

When was the last time a nasty won BB?

In this "slug-gate" video she ignores that Ashleigh is sitting even closer but Helen targets Jale as an eavesdropper.
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1z...lug_shortfilms

I always thought Helen and Ash befriended Jale mainly to regain public support so that could be considered backside kissing.

And, honestly I don't feel that anyone who received a pass to the end would deserve it. I always thought that part of the game was to avoid being nominated on your own merits.

Aishlene wasn't a villain and neither is Helen

Putting aside that Helen has, quite frequently, been a rather unpleasant individual, she is most certainly not a deserving winner if only for the fact that she's basically had a free ride to the final and hasn't really been challenged at all or had to overcome any adversities.

A deserving winner is someone who is repeatedly thrown "curve balls" by the show which they have to rise to and emerge strong and triumphant. Increasingly this looks like Ashleigh, who has been serially 'betrayed' by Big Brother gifting Helen et al ammunition to use against her in the form of revealed Diary Room conversations etc. whilst seldom, if at all, being rewarded with similarly damning information to use against them.

Over the last few weeks it has looked a lot like the production were hell-bent on giving Ashleigh, Christopher and Danielle (and to a lesser extent Chris) a metaphorical kicking whilst pretty much leaving Steven, Helen, Mark, Winston and Ash alone.

That was partly redressed last night when Helen's choice comments about, inter alia, Steven were finally revealed to the house, but it all seems a bit late in the day and tokenistic, an attempt to limit the accusation that they had been deliberately and grossly unfair to certain HMs.

Helen hasn't had to do a thing to get to the final (except not get chucked out) and BB have pretty much left her to it, ergo she cannot possibly be a 'deserving winner'.

Only Ashleigh or Christopher have really been "put through the wringer" enough to have earned it, maybe Chris. The rest have pretty much coasted along.

I'm talking in general, at this present time, not just about BB. Some people seem to think it's cool to be loud mouthed and up front and don't see anything wrong in it.

Hi Mathew.

Isn't time you let up on the boob comments, oh and the PC term is sex worker not hooker, but who cares, it's not like you would be so narrow minded as to hold that against someone now is it?

Nastiness and bullying shouldn't be rewarded. True she has dominated the show but had she been evicted, we'd have got to see more from others.

What a laugh OP.........mind you, I have got to the point when I don't care who wins.......

If she had been on a level playing field, she would have been out of that door faster than Pauline........

It's comments like this that get Helen my vote to win, not because she deserves it, but because no one deserves to be constantly called 'ropey old hooker' etc..

Using these kind of insults in my opinion is just as bad as calling someone a slug.

Not bitter in anyway are you Matthew?