Originally Posted by
JohnnyForget:
“Yes, I'm aware of that, but I think you've missed my point.
Eccleston told Rose that he was 900 years old, yet McCoy mentioned in his first story that he was 953. Hence MINUS 53.
”
Serious answer - it's never been established how the Doctor measures his age.
What is a year - a year on Earth - or Gallifrey - something else?
How do you measure "a year" if you're not even near a planet that HAS a rotation?
What about changes made to timelines?
What about entropy and it's relationship to distance from the centre of the universe?
What about the effects of travelling faster than light?
Basically - the Doctor's "age" is no more able to be accurately interpreted than "star dates" were in classic "Star Trek".