The Peter Cushing Doctor Who was never a part of the BBC canon: the film Doctor was a batty inventor, whereas the first episode of
Doctor Who established that he was not human.
Although a BBC co-production, and therefore a fully regenerated Doctor, the McGann version was just a one-off and therefore difficult to assess as favourite or not - you might as well judge Richard Hurndall (
The Five Doctors) and the many performers in
Dimensions in Time.
For my ten bob's worth, the Doctors in order of preference are:
Tom Baker - not only the longest running, but had some excellent material/co-stars to work with. A change of producer (JNT) scuppered his last season up to a point, but he's still the tops for me.
Jon Pertwee - pretty much as above. He also made the character mysterious yet approachable. Some of the productions were amazingly slick, considering the budget.
Sylvester McCoy - potentially a great Doctor, hampered by shoddy production values and some terrible co-star casting. Could have been the darkest of Doctors.
Colin Baker - again, never got the chance to shine. I know he was pretty OTT sometimes, but watching some of his work with hindsight gives a kinder perspective.
William Hartnell - A long way down the list, but it was in the early days and the purely historical stories never got me as excited as the Sci-Fi ones.
Patrick Troughton - could be breathtakingly dramatic, but a little too clownish for my (six year old) tastes. The hindsight softens the view, but somebody has to come near the bottom!
Peter Davison - too young, too wet, too many people in the TARDIS, too little attention given to the timeslot.
Pease note that none of my comments are against the actors portraying the Doctor - I am attempting to critique the
characters and production values of the programme.
Where will the new Doctor fit into all this? Only Time will tell
I hope that people will give him a chance - I can remember hating ALL the new Doctors when they first appeared!