• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Damage limitation: Chris. The producers were wrong!
<<
<
2 of 8
>>
>
Wrestling_fan
31-07-2014
Originally Posted by Littlegreen42:
“He is being put on such a high pedestal, it's ridiculous.

Anybody else had done it, Chris supporters would react the same as we are to Chris!”

Done what? What has he done?
Penny Crayon
31-07-2014
Originally Posted by Wrestling_fan:
“I imagine she got into trouble for that. Creepy Chris comments are removed from facebook. They're definitely trying to turn it around in his favour.

I imagine the crowd will still chant Creepy Chris on eviction day. Horrible people that they are, trying to make a nickname stick that they would personally hate.”

They've been calling him Creepy Chris inside the house for ages - don't know why Emmas taking credit for it.
Wrestling_fan
31-07-2014
Originally Posted by SegaGamer:
“More conspiracy theories.”

Not a conspiracy theory. The evidence speaks for itself. Why show Chris in such a negative light and then backtrack last night?
SegaGamer
31-07-2014
Originally Posted by Wrestling_fan:
“Done what? What has he done?”

Have you not seen the way he has treated Pav ?
Cara-mae
31-07-2014
I wonder who's on bots tonight,
Wrestling_fan
31-07-2014
Originally Posted by Penny Crayon:
“They've been calling him Creepy Chris inside the house for ages - don't know why Emmas taking credit for it.”

True. It's only a joke, Ash doesn't really mean it. As he said last night.
LMAO
31-07-2014
He pretty much accused Pav of the same thing & even said at the time how he would hate to be thought of like that himself, so he`s not exactly some poor innocent victim.... I don`t think he deserved it & nor did Pav.
Wrestling_fan
31-07-2014
Originally Posted by SegaGamer:
“Have you not seen the way he has treated Pav ?”

What? Took him to one side and said, "Hey mate don't stare at Ashleigh, it's making you look bad." This is because Danielle, Bianca and Matthew told him Pav is obsessed with Ashleigh. Pav said Chis hasn't done anything wrong, what else do you need?
Wrestling_fan
31-07-2014
Originally Posted by GazzaBB:
“Some may find the age difference worrying on top of the fact that Ashleigh has a boyfriend and Chris has got close to her by being a friend.

Different story for a different day though because, once again, there is absolutely no sexual aspect to their friendship in the slightest.”

The age difference is nothing. Look at DiCaprio, all he dates is 19 year old models, and he's 40! Chris wouldn't go there anyway.
JanisElizabeth
31-07-2014
Originally Posted by Wrestling_fan:
“I'm fairly certain the producers know they're wrong, making Chris look a certain way with bad editing. Look at yesterday's show.

Chris was allowed to explain himself in full.
The housemates said he hasn't done anything wrong.
Pav said he's been nothing but nice.
Zoe told Chris he hasn't done anything wrong.

Then there's facebook. A picture of Zoe badmouthing Tesco workers was kept on there for three hours last night. Then this morning another post of Zoe - with the the board around her neck, Most Stuck Up. No pictures of Chris have been shown.

Me thinks they're worried about a law suit, seen as people are calling him Creepy Chris. Chris would be well in his rights to sue them. For the record I don't think Chris has done anything wrong, maybe he's a little overprotective, that's all.”

Lol at the bib. On what grounds could he possibly sue them
shelleyj89
31-07-2014
Originally Posted by Littlegreen42:
“He is being put on such a high pedestal, it's ridiculous.

Anybody else had done it, Chris supporters would react the same as we are to Chris!”

Is he?

Done what? What is "it" ?
bulldog rosie
31-07-2014
This thread needs someone playing a violin in the background.
Littlegreen42
31-07-2014
Originally Posted by Wrestling_fan:
“Done what? What has he done?”

Originally Posted by shelleyj89:
“Is he?

Done what? What is "it" ?”



Accused somebody on national TV of perving over a girl, who hilariously the accuser called 'sexy' himself...

Wrestling_fan
31-07-2014
Originally Posted by JanisElizabeth:
“Lol at the bib. On what grounds could he possibly sue them ”

He's been labelled with the name Creepy Chris after their biased editing. Believe me lawsuits have happened for less. Even on Big Brother...

A good lawyer could get him a fortune
JanisElizabeth
31-07-2014
Originally Posted by Wrestling_fan:
“He's been labelled with the name Creepy Chris after their biased editing. Believe me lawsuits have happened for less. Even on Big Brother...”


Absolute tosh. You can't sue an opinion FGS.
shelleyj89
31-07-2014
Originally Posted by Littlegreen42:
“Accused somebody on national TV of perving over a girl, who hilariously the accuser called 'sexy' himself...

”

I guess you must have some different Channel 4 signal to me then that shows different versions of the highlights. My version didn't have Chris using the word perving or saying that he thought Ashleigh was Sexy. Hhhmmmm.
Wrestling_fan
31-07-2014
Originally Posted by JanisElizabeth:
“Absolute tosh. You can't sue an opinion FGS.”

How is an opinion? They've showed him in a bad light around Ashleigh three times in 72 hours. Which adds up to around three minutes of footage that they didn't need to show. I could argue that they've cut it in a certain way to make it look like he's staring at her, and this has brought about his nickname which is libelous.
Old Endeavour
31-07-2014
HA HA HA I have read it all now! Amateur lawyers thinking that someone can sue just because they say they can.
Whilst what Channel 5 do is disgusting, do you really imagine for a nano-second that they have not all signed contracts spelling out to them that anything they do in the BB house may be shown or not shown in any order that Channel 5 wishes?

They say or do something then they said or did that. Channel 5 are under no obligation to show anything or to provide a fair representation at all. And Channel 5 have stopped the live feed for the very reason that they want to chop the show together in a way that they think will attract most viewers, not in any interest to be fair at all.

This is BB on Channel 5 now.
SegaGamer
31-07-2014
Originally Posted by Wrestling_fan:
“What? Took him to one side and said, "Hey mate don't stare at Ashleigh, it's making you look bad." This is because Danielle, Bianca and Matthew told him Pav is obsessed with Ashleigh. Pav said Chis hasn't done anything wrong, what else do you need?”

Chris hasn't done most of it to Pav's face, that is why Pav has said Chris has done nothing wrong. Chris has been to the diary room a few times having a moan about Pav, calling him a pr**k and and thorn in his side. Then he keeps telling everyone about Pav "looking" at Ashleigh when it's actually just him that is doing it.

The guy is snake, he says one thing to your face but behind your back he will say something different. All the sucking up to Ash when they had to save and replace was pathetic, and then he was saying Steven shouldn't have gone on Friday after bad mouthing him throughout the week.
Wrestling_fan
31-07-2014
Originally Posted by Old Endeavour:
“HA HA HA I have read it all now! Amateur lawyers thinking that someone can sue just because they say they can.
Whilst what Channel 5 do is disgusting, do you really imagine for a nano-second that they have not all signed contracts spelling out to them that anything they do in the BB house may be shown or not shown in any order that Channel 5 wishes?

They say or do something then they said or did that. Channel 5 are under no obligation to show anything or to provide a fair representation at all. And Channel 5 have stopped the live feed for the very reason that they want to chop the show together in a way that they think will attract most viewers, not in any interest to be fair at all.

This is BB on Channel 5 now.”

Has that stopped other housemates suing them before and winning?
bulldog rosie
31-07-2014
Originally Posted by Wrestling_fan:
“How is an opinion? They've showed him in a bad light around Ashleigh three times in 72 hours. Which adds up to around three minutes of footage that they didn't need to show.”

Right Mr lawyer ..........So you admit he was in a bad light around Ashleigh..
Wrestling_fan
31-07-2014
Originally Posted by SegaGamer:
“Chris hasn't done most of it to Pav's face, that is why Pav has said Chris has done nothing wrong. Chris has been to the diary room a few times having a moan about Pav, calling him a pr**k and and thorn in his side. Then he keeps telling everyone about Pav "looking" at Ashleigh when it's actually just him that is doing it.

The guy is snake, he says one thing to your face but behind your back he will say something different. All the sucking up to Ash when they had to save and replace was pathetic, and then he was saying Steven shouldn't have gone on Friday after bad mouthing him throughout the week.”

Everyone has badmouthed Pav. Not just Chris. And the worst part is they're not showing us the other housemates badmouthing Pav. They wanted Chris out, now they've changed their minds.
Wrestling_fan
31-07-2014
Originally Posted by bulldog rosie:
“Right Mr lawyer ..........So you admit he was in a bad light around Ashleigh..”

No, they've shown him in a bad light. Not that he was acting in a bad way.
Wildrover06
31-07-2014
LOL law suits?

Should Dogface or Halfwit sue?
bulldog rosie
31-07-2014
Originally Posted by Wrestling_fan:
“No, they've shown him in a bad light. Not that he was acting in a bad way.”

OK ..if you say so.
<<
<
2 of 8
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map