I was talking with some mates and they asked me to post here this question: out of these 4 personalities which would you choose to evict if all 4 were nominated

SORRY FOR REPEATING , ITS CAUSE A POLL WOULD BE EASIER

1: Someone who has been a player, although integrated in the group, obviously wants to win above all, and when he or she hears some truths against them, they feel sad and reality hits them, although it’s just a game, they get their feelings involved

2: Someone who sometimes cries and gets very emotional discussing their past, but is entertaining, contributes in tasks and sometimes sings, gives opinions (not in a rude way) out of the blue and is honest

3: someone who is composed, has always helped out but isn’t very entertaining, they make good decisions, think about others first but can sometimes be called a know it all or seem dull, also someone with good vocabulary however started a love relationship\fued

4: finally, someone who is lazy, is an overall nice genuine person, but sometimes says "i want to leave, cause i can’t be in a house 24\7" however doesn’t walk cause housemates convince them not too, does contribute in tasks but has a "chillax attitude"

thanks in advance

Where is the poll????

so sorry im trying to add it now, is it here?

4 or 1. Or 2. Maybe 3, but I'm not sure I understood that one.

This is impossible as it's so subjective. For example, you describe #2 as entertaining and #3 as not but what what one finds entertaining differs from person to person. I find 'mint banter' entertaining whereas some don't. I find singing and jazz hands in there irritating but some love it.

Even if we all picked #4 or #3, in reality we may want to keep and kick out different HMs.

ok, valid point

Oh. Are these meant to be actual current housemates? I only recognise one.

3 sounds most like my kind of HM. I'm not sure about any of the others.

Deleted.

If I had to guess

1. Chris
2. Zoe
3. Pav
4. Ash

?

oh god no hahaa, just 4 distinct personalities

?? excuse moi?

nope

It would have been easier if you had summarised each type in a few words on the actual poll. Can't be a*sed (as Ash would say ) trawling back and forth.

I was replying on the other thread, so I've C & P-ed across.

This is quite interesting. Are these your abstractions of actual past/present HMs? If so, whoever they're supposed to be, people will disagree sharply that they're accurate.

It's tricky for me, because none of those described have the absolute red flag characteristics which would normally make me waste my money voting them out in a blood-coloured mist. Also, it's hard to accept being told that someone abstract is 'entertaining' when often that word in BB refers to people I can't bear to watch: Nikki BB7, Charley BB8 or indeed Helen.

But I don't want to duck the Q, so I'd reason like this:
I might consider getting rid of 1. depending on how literally you mean 'wants to win above all'. A bit of deviousness can be a plus in an HM, but not if they're stooping to, eg, character assassinating people who aren't playing the same game.

But maybe I'm taking that too seriously, in which case I'd evict 4. You say they're a nice person, but if they're not being 'actively nice' like 3, that counts for less. Worthy over lazy for me. Likewise if they're saying they want to leave, they can go - don't waste my viewing time with that.

I'd like to know more about 2. - there's not much about what they're like as a person really, but I'll give them the benefit of the doubt, even if they sing (shudders).

I voted 4.

Oops I voted for the one I liked most.

This isn't meant unkindly.


1. I don't like a player, but I also don't agree that it's "just a game". What are the home truths? How do I know that I would I think they were true? Often when people talk about home truths I think they're being small minded, judgemental assholes judging other people by their own low standards. .

2. Doesn't seem to have any negative attributes going by this description, and everyone has some negative attributes, so it's hard to assess them properly

3. What's a love relationship/fued? How can I tell if I would find them entertaining? I was amused by Chris's mate on BBBOTS last night but most people weren't.

4. Genuine is good, nice is good. Lazy can go either way, not fan of walkers or potential ones either. Tricky without more info.

No worries at all ill explain

1 - for instance someone part of the more popular group and has in this case (power trip) had the power a lot, they nominate people based on not liking them and also as a game, however if they are told they do something wrong they take it to heart, even if they are in the wrong (im sorry if i cant explain better) a bit arrogant but not over the top, nor "the leader of the house" attitude.

2 - someone who sometimes brings up "i used to be bullied" or "my parents are divorced" when similar conversation is discussed however says "this isnt a tactic, if you want to evict me, go ahead, its who i am" someone who likes to give advice, jumps around sometimes and admits to saying "im insane, but im happy" gossips but isnt malicious and wants the best for everyone. But can seem annoying to some people i guess

3 - the relationship would mean they are in love with someone and perhaps have a snog in bed then the next morning say "nothing happened, ok it did happen but i dont want to be that guy\girl who had a relationship in the big brother house" someone who contradicts themselves cause of how they may be perceived outside “of course I kissed you cause I like you and find you attractive but I don’t want anything else to happen”

4 – Someone who is popular around the house, but doesn’t like authority, they don’t have arguments but moan sometimes, what you would see most of them, is drinking being socially active however not willing to go the extra mild for their personality to stand out

Which is the fittest?

no.4 id say

1. Bully
2. Nice
3. Dull
4. Over-emotional
5. Fake

Me too, so I'll vote for him!

i didnt understand?

Looks at title, looks at poll Question Oh S!** me too



Are you sure thats not some twisted version of Helen?

OMG 10000% NOTHING LIKE HELEN