Originally Posted by KDDS07:
“You had me until the BIB. There was a post earlier about myths that have grown up around Ashleigh. I think the "letting the attention from the public go to her head" part is very unfair and is the type of thing someone would believe just because a housemate is popular. Ashleigh has shown no indication of her popularity "going to her head" but I see her as being very gracious in victory. Contrast her with Winston holding up his card believing that all 5 housemates would believe he would win (i.e. he believes the hype and thinks he will win). Anyway---just my opinion.
As to Helen---I can't disagree with anything here except to comment that of course Helen has shown "the biggest change" because she's had 15 warnings from BB and all kinds of time and luxury to change. I don't see, with her having the free pass to the final, how that makes her anyone special because she's had ample time to re-invent herself under the luxury of no stress whatsoever---an unfair advantage over all the other housemates and especially housemates like Chris, Christopher and Ashleigh who have gone through hell and high water and they are still standing. No--Helen does not deserve to win----again just my opinion.”
Well I can definitely see where you're coming from, but no, not at all
The fact that Ashleigh is popular has no influence on me in any way shape or form. On the contrary, I've supported HMs before in the past who have been very popular. I've also supported HMs that have been less, or haven't at all been popular.
For me, there have been little indications that Ashleigh has let the cheers go to her head, which has been seen to happen to a lot of popular HMs, believing themselves to be above eviction. Now I'm not saying Ashleigh believes that, but she does at times show signs of letting the popularity go to her head, especially when Chris stated she was the "last woman standing". To be fair, no she isn't.
Regarding who you see deserving, the only one I can agree with is Christopher as he's been the most consistently inoffensive one, but having said that he does seem to have taken this being strung along by Mark thing a little too much to heart and seems to be trying to prove a point that no, he's nobody's plaything. Time will tell how that pans out.
Re the BIB: But isn't that the whole point? Many HMs have had warnings before that have prompted them to put a lid on things but not to really try to change. In Helen's case I think those warnings hit home to her and she realised she can't go on as she has and more importantly, she doesn't want to. Neither in the house or outside.
Like I said, no one disputes that without Helen's free pass she would have been out long ago, but in this instance, I'm glad she was given a free pass because as you say, she's been given all sorts of time to change and grow and what I respect about Helen is that she has grown and she does want to change, but changing something as deeply ingrained as a defence mechanism isn't going to happen overnight.
I wouldn't exactly say Helen has had an easy time in the house. She's been accused of a lot of things at not always fairly, so for me, based on seeing another side of her and based on being pretty much a huge focus of the entire series, I do see her as a deserving winner. Maybe not a liked one, but one who does, in the end, when all is said and done and the "journey" (hate that word) she has taken personally, a deserving one