Originally Posted by cylon6:
“Shooting Stars was the perfect vehicle for Vic & Bob, got higher ratings than any of their sketch shows. I think Hill's surrealness worked in TV Burp, away from that format will 7/8/9m be interested? I have my doubts.
Carrott's Commercial Breakdown wasn't crap. That's nonsense. The follow up series with Rory McGrath, Patrick Kielty, Jimmy Carr and Jo Brand were crap. It should have been kept as occasional specials with Carrott that sometimes hit 13m
Tarrant On TV was just a lesser version of Clive James On Television that worked because of James's wit. Tarrant On TV and Floyd On TV never reached that level of brilliance.
For Harry Hill to be mainstream his humour needs to be more mainstream, but when it is it loses the essence that makes Harry Hill great. Surreal doesn't always work in mainstream TV, Look at Monty Python's figures on BBC1 as an example. Dress it up in a format that is accessible and uses popular targets and it can get ratings like with The Goodies.”
“Shooting Stars was the perfect vehicle for Vic & Bob, got higher ratings than any of their sketch shows. I think Hill's surrealness worked in TV Burp, away from that format will 7/8/9m be interested? I have my doubts.
Carrott's Commercial Breakdown wasn't crap. That's nonsense. The follow up series with Rory McGrath, Patrick Kielty, Jimmy Carr and Jo Brand were crap. It should have been kept as occasional specials with Carrott that sometimes hit 13m
Tarrant On TV was just a lesser version of Clive James On Television that worked because of James's wit. Tarrant On TV and Floyd On TV never reached that level of brilliance.
For Harry Hill to be mainstream his humour needs to be more mainstream, but when it is it loses the essence that makes Harry Hill great. Surreal doesn't always work in mainstream TV, Look at Monty Python's figures on BBC1 as an example. Dress it up in a format that is accessible and uses popular targets and it can get ratings like with The Goodies.”
But the Goodies were always on BBC2, and I don't know why you're mentioning Python on BBC1 given that last happened in 1972, not really an era we can draw many comparisons with to now. The second series wasn't even networked. It was a totally different era.
The points I'm making about Commercial Breakdown and Tarrant on TV is that you have to give the star total credit for the success of this kind of show. Harry Hill has been on primetime ITV for a decade with a show he was totally responsible for. I'm pretty sure he knows what appeals to a primetime audience, it wasn't some kind of fluke. It he's offered a slot on mainstream BBC1 - or indeed has come up himself with something that would work on primetime BBC1 - he's not daft, he'll know exactly the kind of audience he's playing to. With all respect, he doesn't need people to tell him that.
I don't know why you think Harry Hill on BBC1 would be any kind of risk, I think it's a very exciting signing for BBC1 and I think he'll be great there. On all his shows he's worked alongside people like Little and Large, Barry Cryer and so on, and Robin Nash directed his C4 show because he specifically wanted someone with experience of directing the old school light entertainment shows. I also think the mainstream BBC1 audience is far more willing to embrace something out of the ordinary than you're giving them credit for. Certainly more now too than when Python or Ben Elton (nearly 25 years ago now, a totally different generation so a pointless comparison really) were about.
Having said all this, mind, in 2001 I thought Lee Evans was a brilliant signing for BBC1 and his show was an enormous flop.




