• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: UK
The Ratings Thread (Part 61)
<<
<
211 of 536
>>
>
H of De Vil
01-09-2014
Originally Posted by Fudd:
“ITV did show signs of recovery last year with the likes of Splash!, Catchphrase, Off Their Rockers and Broadchurch launching well. They've gone backwards this year and, as stated by H of De Vil, the reasons are a mixture of unexplained and self-inflicted. They need to get a grip, though, and quickly.”

The thing is, during quite times and Summer the BBC have more 4m+ and dependable shows to fall back on. ITV rely on YBF rpt's and drama rpt's.

I feel next year will be stronger with more shows coming through and no World Cup, but only if they get their heads together, get a decent scheduler and get rid of Stuart Blackburn.

I would've found ITV's Summer less awful if Corrie wasn't so bad. Its the only thing that was holding up their schedule.
wizzywick
01-09-2014
Originally Posted by C14E:
“
He's rather protective of Samuel. ”

What's more normal? protecting a person or protecting an inaminate TV station?
cylon6
01-09-2014
Originally Posted by wizzywick:
“What's more normal? protecting a person or protecting an inaminate TV station?”

Game, set and match Wizzywick!
Andy23
01-09-2014
I may have missed it, do we know what slot 'Cilla' is going to air in, and what it will be up against. It does look like quite a landmark drama for this season, but having said that so did Tommy Cooper.
C14E
01-09-2014
Originally Posted by wizzywick:
“What's more normal? protecting a person or protecting an inaminate TV station?”

Unless you actually know Samuel then he's just an internet troll, it'd be like repeatedly leaping to the defence of one of those Justin Bieber fangirls. He loves stirring it, he doesn't need protecting.

In any event, Samuel spends all day "protecting" an inanimate TV station and attacking another with a degree of vitriol unmatched by anyone in the history of this thread. So he's failing your "normal" criteria!
H of De Vil
01-09-2014
Originally Posted by Andy23:
“I may have missed it, do we know what slot 'Cilla' is going to air in, and what it will be up against. It does look like quite a landmark drama for this season, but having said that so did Tommy Cooper.”

I believe it will be on Monday at 9pm on the 15th September against a weaker New Tricks.
wizzywick
01-09-2014
Originally Posted by Andy23:
“I may have missed it, do we know what slot 'Cilla' is going to air in, and what it will be up against. It does look like quite a landmark drama for this season, but having said that so did Tommy Cooper.”

Cilla begins on September 15th (a Monday) against New Tricks. It'll do well enough because biopics always attract a certain level of interest. Might not be in mega hit territory, but I don't think it'll flop either.
Chris1964
01-09-2014
Originally Posted by wizzywick:
“I was an observer of this thread when I joined in 2004, and the thread hasn't actually changed at all. The posters have. The same banter is there, the same discussion is there. It's just different people doing it. I do miss Robbie and George S though. Their discussions were often hilarious! No one is saying you can't have an opinion. It's just that your perception of this thread is likely to be greatly different to the majority's. If the poster you refer to annoys you so much, ignore him! Just participate in the discussions you want to talk about. Simples! But, hey, it's 15 weeks until Christmas, so let's not fall out!”

As an aside, both RS and GeorgeS appear on page 1 of Ratings thread 1 back in 2007(ignoring the prelude) along with current contributors ronant and Dancc (also the originator Mitch 123 and curiously two or three posters listed as banned).
Im actually quite proud to be on page two. Its a long time ago now.
Fudd
01-09-2014
Originally Posted by wizzywick:
“But that was the bizarre thing! ITV appeared stronger because BBC1 was pathetically weak! ITV's new programmes were generally well received, especially the shows you mention, even Splash! performed well against dire BBC1 offerings like Secret Service and Britains Brightest (which wasn't as dire as the Secret service show). Yet, even though ITV had stronger programmes, BBC1 still, despite a mediocre output, beat ITV in the averages more frequently. I don't understand that one. It does seem a bit like the Tory predicament. The Tories get 36% of the vote yet don't get a majority. The Labour Party get 36% of the vote and get a landslide victory! So if ITV are the Tory party, no matter how well they do or how good their shows are, BBC1 still win by default!”

Takeaway was opposite The Voice in 2013 and held up well. Broadchurch would have done well against whatever, probably. Splash! benefited from poor competition and The Voice blitzed it completely in 2014. Catchphrase and Off Their Rockers' decline is strange this year while neither Takeaway or Britain's Got Talent took off in quite the same way as last year. I can't remember what the heck ITV aired over the summer months but I'm pretty certain it was better than what we had this year.

Originally Posted by H of De Vil:
“The thing is, during quite times and Summer the BBC have more 4m+ and dependable shows to fall back on. ITV rely on YBF rpt's and drama rpt's.

I feel next year will be stronger with more shows coming through and no World Cup, but only if they get their heads together, get a decent scheduler and get rid of Stuart Blackburn.

I would've found ITV's Summer less awful if Corrie wasn't so bad. Its the only thing that was holding up their schedule.”

The schedule would have been awful with a strong Coronation Street, though.
cylon6
01-09-2014
Originally Posted by Andy23:
“What a surprise coming from you, Samuel's number one supporter. I'm actually convinced you are the same person, and you are the more normal character against the obvious wind up 'Samuel' character.

The fact is, the thread wasn't the same then at all. I never saw Robbie or George take over the thread so much, dictate the content on a daily basis, write overbearing essays night after night, stop analysis in its tracks by repeating the same posts over an over again.

What is noticeable now is that days go by when we don't even get a full set of ratings. Often there is the one headline rating, that is pounced on, discussed or rather ridiculed for pages, and nobody even notices that we haven't got any others. That is because those ratings aren't necessary anymore. Did we even get a rating for The Game Show Story for example?”

The way to change direction in a thread is to introduce other topics for discussion. This place has always been a few ratings with some discussion. This thread only started due to the ratings being copied and pasted from Gallifrey Base. If anybody wants dry ratings there are always the DS ratings reports.

Ratings are put here as posters choose to not because they have to. If there are no ratings there isn't much else to do except discuss what has been posted or what scheduling or commissions might work.
SamuelW
01-09-2014
Originally Posted by C14E:
“In any event, Samuel spends all day "protecting" an inanimate TV station and attacking another with a degree of vitriol unmatched by anyone in the history of this thread. So he's failing your "normal" criteria! ”

Firstly, I'm not a troll. And secondly, I don't spend "all day protecting a tv station". I worked a long hard day today, making myself some well earned money, and then after a pretty hectic day I made a few-paragraph post at about 6.30pm. I havent been on here all day, as youd or others suggested. Between 10am-6pm, 8hours throughout today, I was not 'dictating the discussion'. Other people dictated the discussion about XF's poor ratings because they indeed were poor and was the standout rating from yesterday [for the wrong reasons]. It was nothing to do with me that there was so much discussion about the dire XF figure.
wizzywick
01-09-2014
Originally Posted by C14E:
“Unless you actually know Samuel then he's just an internet troll, it'd be like repeatedly leaping to the defence of one of those Justin Bieber fangirls. He loves stirring it, he doesn't need protecting.

In any event, Samuel spends all day "protecting" an inanimate TV station and attacking another with a degree of vitriol unmatched by anyone in the history of this thread. So he's failing your "normal" criteria! ”

The only people I know personally are the real ones in the real world: real, solid, physical people. Samuel could be a chimpanzee for all I know and you might be a duck! Trolls are subjective. If you don't mind the way a poster expresses his view then he's not a troll. If you get offended by it then he is. Samuel isn't a troll by the way. He's just Samuel. I don't slag him off behind his back to other posters. I do it directly to him by replying to his posts that I find annoying. You can get surprisingly good discussions by doing that.
H of De Vil
01-09-2014
Originally Posted by Fudd:
“Takeaway was opposite The Voice in 2013 and held up well. Broadchurch would have done well against whatever, probably. Splash! benefited from poor competition and The Voice blitzed it completely in 2014. Catchphrase and Off Their Rockers' decline is strange this year while neither Takeaway or Britain's Got Talent took off in quite the same way as last year. I can't remember what the heck ITV aired over the summer months but I'm pretty certain it was better than what we had this year.



The schedule would have been awful with a strong Coronation Street, though.”

Oh yeah I know, but it would make the schedule seem a bit more worthwhile with a strong drama, than one that is just plodding along without a single thought to the quality.
Andy23
01-09-2014
Another thing is that this thread used to be a centre of accuracy, our own ratings charts were created, ironing out Barb irregularities such as missing programmes, single shows cut into two, or two shows joined into one, and ensuring fairness and consistency.

Thesedays certain people actually enjoy inaccurate ratings and hope they are perpetuated. As long as it goes their way, it doesn't matter. Repeately quoting the wrong figures even though they are corrected each time by someone else, hoping the wrong ones will be picked up elsewhere.

I know we will go down this route when doing the chart of the year. The different methods of World Cup rating breakdowns would have been ironed out one way or the other way in the past, whereas now it won't be and we will have pages of gloating and 'haha serves them right' type posts.
ftv
01-09-2014
Originally Posted by Chris1964:
“As an aside, both RS and GeorgeS appear on page 1 of Ratings thread 1 back in 2007(ignoring the prelude) along with current contributors ronant and Dancc (also the originator Mitch 123 and curiously two or three posters listed as banned).
Im actually quite proud to be on page two. Its a long time ago now.”

I miss George although he used to give me a hard time
wizzywick
01-09-2014
Originally Posted by Andy23:
“Another thing is that this thread used to be a centre of accuracy, our own ratings charts were created, ironing out Barb irregularities such as missing programmes, single shows cut into two, or two shows joined into one, and ensuring fairness and consistency.

Thesedays certain people actually enjoy inaccurate ratings and hope they are perpetuated. As long as it goes their way, it doesn't matter. Repeately quoting the wrong figures even though they are corrected each time by someone else, hoping the wrong ones will be picked up elsewhere.

I know we will go down this route when doing the chart of the year. The different methods of World Cup rating breakdowns would have been ironed out one way or the other way in the past, whereas now it won't be and we will have pages of gloating and 'haha serves them right' type posts.”

Calm down love, you'll give yourself high blood pressure!
cylon6
01-09-2014
Originally Posted by Dancc:
“BREAKING NEWS

(well, actually it broke at about 1:15PM this afternoon but I've only just spotted it !)

Channel 5 beat Channel 4 in the weekly ratings for the first time in its 17 year history. (All Individuals, All Hours, including +1 channels)

C5: 5.4%
C4: 5.3%

http://www.barb.co.uk/whats-new/week...g-summary?_s=4”

That is a significant moment. Due to Celebrity Big Brother?
Fudd
01-09-2014
Originally Posted by wizzywick:
“Cilla begins on September 15th (a Monday) against New Tricks. It'll do well enough because biopics always attract a certain level of interest. Might not be in mega hit territory, but I don't think it'll flop either.”

Downton Abbey is a 8 part series and starts on 21st September so will finish on 9th November. Cilla will finish on 29th September so they could fit in Grantchester (six episodes) which would end on 10th November which could mean I'm A Celebrity... will launch on 16th November.

But where does Great Fire fit if that is the case? There's not enough Wednesday nights between Scott and Bailey and I'm A Celebrity... if it does launch then so I guess it will replace Chasing Shadows on Thursday's.
wizzywick
01-09-2014
Originally Posted by Fudd:
“Downton Abbey is a 8 part series and starts on 21st September so will finish on 9th November. Cilla will finish on 29th September so they could fit in Grantchester (six episodes) which would end on 10th November which could mean I'm A Celebrity... will launch on 16th November.

But where does Great Fire if that is the case? There's not enough Wednesday nights between Scott and Bailey and I'm A Celebrity... if it does launch then so I guess it will replace Chasing Shadows on Thursday's.”

Grantchester is going to be ITV's hit of the Autumn. Good time to launch it too. Towards the end of a wavering, formulaic and yet dull New Tricks, darker nights, Autumn well and truly set in. Should do well.

Could they possibly be keeping The Great Fire for the run up to Christmas?
Salv*
01-09-2014
Originally Posted by cylon6:
“That is a significant moment. Due to Celebrity Big Brother?”

Possibly, very solid officials for CBB's first week, it could be either that, or Ch4 not having a good week.

As for X Factor, yes, it was low, but it was one rating, it could be a series where it increases, however next Sat will be difficult. I predict (with +1), it will get 7.8m, against Strictly's 8.2m.
Fudd
01-09-2014
Originally Posted by wizzywick:
“Grantchester is going to be ITV's hit of the Autumn. Good time to launch it too. Towards the end of a wavering, formulaic and yet dull New Tricks, darker nights, Autumn well and truly set in. Should do well.

Could they possibly be keeping The Great Fire for the run up to Christmas?”

Potentially - maybe it'll take the Monday slot after I'm A Celebrity... so there is some quality in December. But on the other hand, isn't that a bit close to Christmas for ITV? Money wise, they may ensure it airs before I'm A Celebrity...
johnnymc
01-09-2014
Originally Posted by Salv*:
“Possibly, very solid officials for CBB's first week, it could be either that, or Ch4 not having a good week.

As for X Factor, yes, it was low, but it was one rating, it could be a series where it increases, however next Sat will be difficult. I predict (with +1), it will get 7.8m, against Strictly's 8.2m.”

I think you may be over estimating "Strictly Come Dancing" launch programme. It probably will be mid 6 million against "The X Factor" it has taken a while to build an audience for the launch. There doesn't seem to be much goodwill towards "The X Factor" from the media either, almost willing it to fail, I dunno if the press are waiting for Simon Cowell to fall. I don't watch the show but what else would ITV replace it with and a strong ITV has always helped BBC create better programmes and compete harder.
yorkie100
01-09-2014
Originally Posted by wizzywick:
“Grantchester is going to be ITV's hit of the Autumn. Good time to launch it too. Towards the end of a wavering, formulaic and yet dull New Tricks, darker nights, Autumn well and truly set in. Should do well.

Could they possibly be keeping The Great Fire for the run up to Christmas?”

Didnt someone suggest The Great Fire could be stripped - its only 4 episodes?
Zac Quinn
01-09-2014
Originally Posted by johnnymc:
“I think you may be over estimating "Strictly Come Dancing" launch programme. It probably will be mid 6 million against "The X Factor"”

It got 8.4m last year so that'd be a hell of a drop, regardless of competition from a differently-skewing show on the other side. Consolidated to 9.53m.
johnnymc
01-09-2014
Originally Posted by Zac Quinn:
“It got 8.4m last year so that'd be a hell of a drop, regardless of competition from a differently-skewing show on the other side. Consolidated to 9.53m.”

Right! Ah well I'm massively underpridicting then. I feel it can't beat "The X Factor" and the audience will split. The results show never did as well against "Coronation Street" and I expected the launch to be equally low.
<<
<
211 of 536
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map