|
||||||||
The Ratings Thread (Part 61) |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1001 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 603
|
What are the ratings like for the opening 2 episodes of Dragons' Den?
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#1002 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,232
|
Quote:
There were as many failures as there is today. Your memory just chooses to select the best. Some of the titles were 30 years ago that you are talking about.
|
|
|
|
|
#1003 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 17,541
|
Quote:
It was achieving 18 million viewers at its height in 1986.
|
|
|
|
|
#1004 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 17,541
|
Quote:
Didn't Shane Richie's Caught in the Act get 12 million?
|
|
|
|
|
#1005 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 342
|
Quote:
Tumble premičred with an average audience of 3.16m (20.7%).
|
|
|
|
|
#1006 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Cumbria
Posts: 16,967
|
Quote:
Bread was a great watch imo when it was fresh, its a classic example of a comedy that was done to death -it became like a soap with too many episodes(74 over 7 series -the first two UK regulation 6 but series 3/4/5 each had 13) and the laughs couldn't be sustained. It actually hit 20.95 million at its peak but had drifted down to 10 million and less 3 years later, by which time it had become a bit of national joke for all the wrong reasons.
She is a tart! ( popular catchphrase, not a reference to Ms Lane). |
|
|
|
|
#1007 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 12,020
|
Quote:
In the days of Bill Cotton light entertainment was the cornerstone of BBC 1's Saturday schedule and they were extremely good at it. I can recall shows like The Generation Game and The Two Ronnies pulling in 19 million viewers and wiping out ITV. Now, apart from SCD, they seem to be floundering. Tumble is OK, but certainly isn't on a par with the much loved BBC One greats of the past and will probably go after one series.
So surely there should be some sort of attempt to create presenting stars/pre watershed acts/double acts. Its interesting that BGT (correct me I'm wrong) attracts mostly singers and dance troupes -are there any double acts/pre-watershed style comedians (not gimmicky kids) turning up? Or is it an area that is simply not fashionable anymore? |
|
|
|
|
#1008 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 23,342
|
Quote:
I'm a product of the seventies and eighties and Bruce's Big Night was considered a big flop because it was only getting 9 million. These days this is similar to what IAC gets and that's classed as a big hit. Very few shows now break the 10 million barrier and if this was the case in the seventies, ITV would probably have gone bankrupt and the BBC director general would have resigned.
Also the name Salv, does this suggest an Italian link in your family as it looks like a shortened version of Salvatore? 8/9m in the three channel 70s in primetime is probably equivalent to 3m now in terms of failure. |
|
|
|
|
#1009 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,264
|
Quote:
Dead on arrival. Very poor indeed. I caught 5-minutes of it and then turned it off. Very boring. Happy with that rating?! 3.2m? No they won't. Yes 20% is OK - but the raw numbers are terrible. If this had been on ITV and it had got those numbers you would have had a field day declaring it the biggest ITV entertainment flop ever. It underperformed. Looks like a one series show. |
|
|
|
|
#1010 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,154
|
3 million won't be enough for "Tumble" to survive the axe. I can't really see how its meant to grow from here? It launch got so much publicity but maybe it will shoot up over the next few weeks. I doubt that though.
|
|
|
|
|
#1011 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,232
|
I think there is a very good chance that The Village will be under 4m tonight.
|
|
|
|
|
#1012 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,463
|
Quote:
The problem though is that there just aren't any Forsyths/Coopers/Dawsons/Morcambes/Corbetts/Barkers/Baxters and more plus a whole host of second tier variety acts around anymore. All the above were effectively compelled to make television for the pre-watershed market(and no doubt were happy to do so) and it created a golden age of comedies and LE which millions still look back with fondness(accepting that there were duff shows too). Look to today and what do we have- a raft of stand up comedians most of whom are awkward with the idea of appearing before 9.00, a host of (perhaps being unkind here) bland presenters who don't go beyond a bit of smalltalk and a link-and Ant and Dec who have cornered the market as the only family "act" who start to approach the kind of reputation as the big names of yesteryear.
So surely there should be some sort of attempt to create presenting stars/pre watershed acts/double acts. Its interesting that BGT (correct me I'm wrong) attracts mostly singers and dance troupes -are there any double acts/pre-watershed style comedians (not gimmicky kids) turning up? Or is it an area that is simply not fashionable anymore? |
|
|
|
|
#1013 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 12,020
|
Quote:
In week one, yes.
![]() Didn't series one maintain 10 or 11 million though? |
|
|
|
|
#1014 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Cumbria
Posts: 16,967
|
Quote:
The problem though is that there just aren't any Forsyths/Coopers/Dawsons/Morcambes/Corbetts/Barkers/Baxters and more plus a whole host of second tier variety acts around anymore. All the above were effectively compelled to make television for the pre-watershed market(and no doubt were happy to do so) and it created a golden age of comedies and LE which millions still look back with fondness(accepting that there were duff shows too). Look to today and what do we have- a raft of stand up comedians most of whom are awkward with the idea of appearing before 9.00, a host of (perhaps being unkind here) bland presenters who don't go beyond a bit of smalltalk and a link-and Ant and Dec who have cornered the market as the only family "act" who start to approach the kind of reputation as the big names of yesteryear.
So surely there should be some sort of attempt to create presenting stars/pre watershed acts/double acts. Its interesting that BGT (correct me I'm wrong) attracts mostly singers and dance troupes -are there any double acts/pre-watershed style comedians (not gimmicky kids) turning up? Or is it an area that is simply not fashionable anymore? Also a big source of talent then was the working men's club circuit. This provided stars such as Cannon and Ball and comedians of the old school who popped up on The Comedians. |
|
|
|
|
#1015 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Bath
Posts: 1,036
|
Seeing as these 'ratings' are just fanciful extrapolations from a very limited 'sample' of the population, I have no idea why people put so much stock in them, especially citing precise numbers or claiming 'victory' of one show over another with a difference of just a few thousand, or even hundred thousand. Surely the margin for error must be pretty wide.
|
|
|
|
|
#1016 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ghosts Forge
Posts: 38,995
|
Quote:
It's a tragedy how far comedy and entertainment have fallen at the BBC. In the 70s, 80s and early 90s it was propping up BBC1. It doesn't help how they're scheduled either. Everything on BBC1 in the 9pm hour and at 10pm on BBC2.
19.00 No Place Like Home 19.30 EastEnders 20.00 Last of the Summer Wine 20.30 You Must Be the Husband 21.00 News 21.30 Crimewatch UK 22.10 Truckers Make that at least four comedies on primetime (five if you count Eastenders )Quote:
3 million won't be enough for "Tumble" to survive the axe. I can't really see how its meant to grow from here? It launch got so much publicity but maybe it will shoot up over the next few weeks. I doubt that though.
![]() I don't think there's much patience for new shows these days. The producers just want to find a golden ticket and people are happy to dismiss the show/recognise whether they are on to something here based on a few episodes. |
|
|
|
|
#1017 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 16,670
|
Has anyone got the ratings to the Sky show that ran for a couple of series a few years ago? It was very similar in format to Tumble - though I think better delivered.
The main difference was that it was presented as celebs learning to do circus acts and was set in a big top. This instantly provided more variety than we saw on Tumble - its biggest problem in a 90 minute slot for a first show that had to grab the audience. Plus a more viewer friendly format hook and set design that Tumble seriously lacked. So we saw them not just balancing or twirling round a hoop but walking a tightrope, trapeze and so forth. I expect Tumble will add these sort of elements later but there needed to be a taster of that up front to hook the audience. As Tumble billed itself during the preview and the show as circus related I wonder if they bought the rights to the Sky show or basically remade it unasked? Either way it would be interesting to compare ratings against normal expectations for a Sky weekend show versus the same for a BBC one. As this might give indications about which approach to the same kind of idea appealed to the audience more. Cannot recall who presented the Sky 1 show but I imagine they were better suited to the concept than Alex Jones who simply did Tumble no favours at all. Someone more fun presenting it (Graham Norton - Vernon Kay etc) and it would have got 5 million IMO. Though the one good thing from the detailed ratings is that these climbed slowly but steadily throughout given the great length of the show and early start. No obvious sign of loads of viewers tuning in, getting bored and turning off. So week two just might be interesting if it starts off around where it left off. |
|
|
|
|
#1018 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 17,541
|
Quote:
Yes I remember because I think You've Been Framed was getting about 18 million and the Beeb were once again way behind the public mood and arriving late with a sub-standard version. CITA just didn't flow at all iirc.
Didn't series one maintain 10 or 11 million though? |
|
|
|
|
#1019 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 216
|
Quote:
Tumble could be improved by making Louis Smith more involved in the performances. His routine last night was the best bit. He's certainly popular enough but having him reduced to a judge under a Romanian lady who nobody outside gymnastics will have heard of is one of its flaws. Its main attraction is Louis Smith but you wouldn't know that by watching it.
When she defected from Romania to USA in 1989 she led the news bulletins the developed world over. it has even been said (although I would think an exaggeration) that her defection played a part in the fall of Ceaucescu. She made a complete hash of the publicity around her defection and that stopped her getting major contracts. So in this country she has had a low profile since (although higher in USA and Romania). She is possibly hoping that if Tumble is a success it could transfer to USA alaSCD/ DWTS and she would be a judge. In terms of the all time great sportswomen she's up there with Martina Navratilova. |
|
|
|
|
#1020 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 17,541
|
Quote:
Indeed, just look at this schedule in October 1987:
19.00 No Place Like Home 19.30 EastEnders 20.00 Last of the Summer Wine 20.30 You Must Be the Husband 21.00 News 21.30 Crimewatch UK 22.10 Truckers Make that at least four comedies on primetime (five if you count Eastenders )![]() You Must Be the Husband got a surprisingly quick second series the following spring, but was scrapped after that. I often wondered if it was just one series split into two. |
|
|
|
|
#1021 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 50,506
|
Quote:
Has anyone got the ratings to the Sky show that ran for a couple of series a few years ago? It was very similar in format to Tumble - though I think better delivered.
The second rated worse, leading to its cancellation. |
|
|
|
|
#1022 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 12,020
|
Quote:
I can't remember exactly, but I don't think the ratings were ever a disaster. I half expected a second series.
|
|
|
|
|
#1023 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 16,670
|
Quote:
Cirque de Celebrité averaged around 500,000 viewers consolidated for its first series, broadcast in autumn 2006.
The second rated worse, leading to its cancellation. The format wasn't perfect and could have been improved. Problem is BBC's format took the idea and made it worse. But with these kind of shows, host, judges and contestants all matter a lot. You can forgive the slowness of the format if the bits in between are fun because of the people contracted to fill the air time in between the performances. That was where Tumble failed - though practice might well improve things next week. We should give them all another chance. Sadly I just feel that this is not an Alex Jones style show IMO. |
|
|
|
|
#1024 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 17,541
|
Quote:
Yes there was a great appetite for clips created by YBF but advert free CITA still managed to be a laboured format with too many links (there was a slot with gaffes from abroad and I think foreign presenters) and it seemed far fewer actual clips. That's how it came across to me and I can still remember thinking it was amazing how the Beeb could make a stuttering show out of a then golden idea-just show the bloody clips
![]() ![]() Wasn't there a quiz round of some description, too?
|
|
|
|
|
#1025 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 12,020
|
Quote:
![]() Wasn't there a quiz round of some description, too? ![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:27.



Dead on arrival. Very poor indeed. I caught 5-minutes of it and then turned it off. Very boring.
)
