• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: UK
The Ratings Thread (Part 61)
<<
<
487 of 536
>>
>
Fudd
30-09-2014
Originally Posted by leicslad46:
“Talent show creep is eating into friday nights scheduing thanks to SC. Xf could have started earlier than it did. So now ITV are having to cram in a friday installment to catch up for the live shows. Or was this part of the plan by SC”

Why would they start it in mid August? I know they have in the past but it hurt the figures. And the BBC started the reality show creep by Strictly having Friday night episodes due to a bulked up cast. It's getting to the point where they're trying to outdo each other in taking the mick.
Steve Williams
30-09-2014
Originally Posted by leicslad46:
“Talent show creep is eating into friday nights scheduing thanks to SC. Xf could have started earlier than it did. So now ITV are having to cram in a friday installment to catch up for the live shows. Or was this part of the plan by SC”

But a few years ago it was starting in mid-August and the early episodes were rating pretty poorly because it was the height of summer and everyone was on holiday, so they've moved it back to start right at the end of the month. But that means, if they're keeping the format as it is, there are more episodes to show in a shorter time. So swings and roundabouts.
NeilVW
30-09-2014
Originally Posted by Steve Williams:
“I don't know about that, I remember the final of the second Pop Idol ran from 6.45 to 9.30, with no competition (although they stuck a quick news bulletin in unscheduled at 8.50 so the last half hour counted as a separate show with a higher rating).”

That might have been the plan, but it didn't work out:

Quote:
“ITV
w/e 21 Dec 2003
1 CORONATION STREET (MON 1932) 14.65
2 CORONATION STREET (MON 2029) 14.59
3 CORONATION STREET (WED 1931) 13.22
4 CORONATION STREET (FRI 1932) 12.41
5 CORONATION STREET (SUN 1929) 11.49
6 POP IDOL (SAT 1847) 11.04
7 EMMERDALE (MON 1901) 10.42
8 POP IDOL LIVE FINAL (SAT 2053) 10.13 ”

Looking at MediaGuardian's report on the overnights, it seems the earlier show outrated the later one on that measure too. The whole extravaganza averaged 10.9m (46%) over the scheduled slot of two-and-three-quarter hours with a 15-minute peak of 11.9m as early as 19:30. Michelle McManus won which caused Pete Waterman to storm out, says the article.

It also says the average was -2.2m down on the audience that saw Will Young unexpectedly beat Gareth Gates in the final of the first series, with the peak down around -3m. The series was then axed and The X Factor was born, which as we remember prompted a notable court case.

Here's an interesting bit:

Quote:
“The big audience inherited from Pop Idol could not save ITV1's rugby World Cup celebration, We are the Champions: the Nation Celebrates.

The show, hosted by Chris Tarrant and featuring members of the rugby squad answering questions from a celebrity audience, could only muster 3.6 million, around one in six viewers, at 9.30pm.

Nearly seven million viewers switched over - or switched off - immediately after the Pop Idol winner was announced.”

What a bizarre idea for a Saturday night.

"Pop Idol hits a false note"
http://www.theguardian.com/media/2003/dec/22/overnights
wizzywick
30-09-2014
Just watching the repeat of Gogglebox on C4. Have never seen it before. What the hell is the appeal of this vile programme? Bring back TV Burp! A classy, and endearing show. Gogglebox is artificial, staged and full of vulgar people. Yuk! What the hell has happened to British television?
Jaycee Dove
30-09-2014
Originally Posted by Pizzatheaction:
“Was that on C4?”

No, done quite a few such shows and possibly one on Channel 4 at some point but that particular chat show was on Sky.

Back when Sky was very young. And so were we.

Thanks to the other posters for info on those 60s shows.
johnnymc
30-09-2014
Originally Posted by wizzywick:
“Just watching the repeat of Gogglebox on C4. Have never seen it before. What the hell is the appeal of this vile programme? Bring back TV Burp! A classy, and endearing show. Gogglebox is artificial, staged and full of vulgar people. Yuk! What the hell has happened to British television?”

I didn't get the massive appeal of "Googlebox" either, yet its gone down a storm with critics and viewers.
yorkie100
30-09-2014
Last weekends figures for SCD/XF

Friday 26th Sep
SCD 6.53m (28.5%)
XF 5.28m (23.3%) +570k = 5.85m

Saturday 27th Sep
SCD 8.18m (39%)
XF 7.34m (32.2%) + 514k = 7.85m

Sunday 28th Sep
XF 8.50 (35.4%) +467k = 8.97m

Averages (2013 in brackets)

SCD 7.36m (8.46m)
XF 7.56m (8.66m)
Chris1964
30-09-2014
Originally Posted by Aurora13:
“It is the loss of Alun Armstrong character who provided comedy and emotional depth. They replaced him with Nicholas Lyndhurst who as we know is capable of fulfilling this role but his character is written badly. The viewer has no connection with this odd ball in contrast with the original odd ball who pulled on the emotions of the viewer.”

Yes Iv said that before and I think its generally accepted that Alun( and his screen wife) carried the majority of the lighter moments-even if he was an intermittent alcoholic himself. Have to say though-even with the original cast-I didn't think they put enough comedy into it-I actually think the show could have been bigger than it was.

Agreed about the Nicholas Lyndhurst character. From what I have seen he is too dry and bland-somehow there is very little spark between the four of them.
yorkie100
30-09-2014
Originally Posted by wizzywick:
“Just watching the repeat of Gogglebox on C4. Have never seen it before. What the hell is the appeal of this vile programme? Bring back TV Burp! A classy, and endearing show. Gogglebox is artificial, staged and full of vulgar people. Yuk! What the hell has happened to British television?”

Originally Posted by johnnymc:
“I didn't get the massive appeal of "Googlebox" either, yet its gone down a storm with critics and viewers.”

All the scripted reality shows are the same and I dont get them either. The excuse always quoted is that its ok because they are entertaining !!!

Well were you entertained? No me neither.
wizzywick
30-09-2014
Originally Posted by yorkie100:
“All the scripted reality shows are the same and I dont get them either. The excuse always quoted is that its ok because they are entertaining !!!

Well were you entertained?”

I'm afraid I turned it off. I was dismayed by the hypocrisy. One woman complaining about Gordon Ramsay swearing, then proceeded to use the same swear words herself. I am now going to make myself a cup of hot chocolate and then I will pull my fingernails out.
johnnymc
30-09-2014
Originally Posted by yorkie100:
“All the scripted reality shows are the same and I dont get them either. The excuse always quoted is that its ok because they are entertaining !!!

Well were you entertained?”

I only watched one to be fair so maybe it wasn't a good episode. But I was trying to see why viewers had surged to this format and someone told me it was really an excellent show. I thought it was just really quite an ordinary Channel 4 show that wouldn't be out of place in daytime. But its multi award winning! Its got a good rating to some of BBC one Friday evening comedies too.
AlexiR
30-09-2014
Originally Posted by NeilVW:
“Looking at MediaGuardian's report on the overnights, it seems the earlier show outrated the later one on that measure too. The whole extravaganza averaged 10.9m (46%) over the scheduled slot of two-and-three-quarter hours with a 15-minute peak of 11.9m as early as 19:30. Michelle McManus won which caused Pete Waterman to storm out, says the article.

It also says the average was -2.2m down on the audience that saw Will Young unexpectedly beat Gareth Gates in the final of the first series, with the peak down around -3m. The series was then axed and The X Factor was born, which as we remember prompted a notable court case.”

Thinking about it it really is quite extraordinary that ITV dumped Pop Idol (and after only two series) for The X Factor. This is like if they'd won the rights to The Voice just ditching The X Factor and going with The Voice instead. It just seems like it would never happen now. Although I suppose back then they had the comfort of knowing that if The X Factor bombed they could always have the triumphant return of Pop Idol the following year.
Chris1964
30-09-2014
Originally Posted by H of De Vil:
“Strictly is bloated to give it time over the evening to grow and to eat into TXF slot. Padding galore on Strictly.

Really looking forward to TXF Live shows. 2hrs 30minutes might be a long time, but given the amount of acts it no wonder its so long.”

That must be the longest show ever? Ridiculously long imo and I think it will affect its rating as well as going to 10.00 and having a 60 minute overlap with SCD. Much counting against - but we also have the live-re emergence of Cole and Cowell which may deflect some of the negative aspects-at least on the first night. Fascinating ratings on Sunday morning.
johnnymc
30-09-2014
Originally Posted by AlexiR:
“Thinking about it it really is quite extraordinary that ITV dumped Pop Idol (and after only two series) for The X Factor. This is like if they'd won the rights to The Voice just ditching The X Factor and going with The Voice instead. It just seems like it would never happen now. Although I suppose back then they had the comfort of knowing that if The X Factor bombed they could always have the triumphant return of Pop Idol the following year.”

I was thinking the same reading the article. But there was a confidence back then just to axe something, now its allowed more time just in case its a hit. I don't think "Splash" would have seen the studio floor had it been pitched back then.
yorkie100
30-09-2014
Was just going to say that I have enjoyed EE the last couple of days and then I find that apparently there is another *HUGE* EE announcement at Midnight. These do my head in - we do not need them as they only ruin the suprise.
johnnymc
30-09-2014
Originally Posted by yorkie100:
“Was just going to say that I have enjoyed EE the last couple of days and then I find that apparently there is another *HUGE* EE announcement at Midnight. These do my head in - we do not need them as they only ruin the suprise.”

Do you think the actors and writers are given enough time though. Some of the acting is very poor and dialogue clunky. I don't remember it being so over acted and like a parody of itself before.
AlexiR
30-09-2014
Originally Posted by johnnymc:
“I was thinking the same reading the article. But there was a confidence back then just to axe something, now its allowed more time just in case its a hit. I don't think "Splash" would have seen the studio floor had it been pitched back then.”

I don't know about Splash ITV did make the likes of Celebrity Love Island and Celebrity Wrestling around this time as well. I suspect it just would have been called Celebrity Splash or Celebrity Diving instead. And there's always just been those shows and formats that make it onto air and you just wonder how anyone thought it was a good idea (that weird rugby celebration show that followed the Pop Idol final for example, seriously what were they thinking?). It was certainly an incredibly confident move from ITV to ditch Pop Idol though its a confidence and risk taking that they might benefit a little from now.

Originally Posted by yorkie100:
“Was just going to say that I have enjoyed EE the last couple of days and then I find that apparently there is another *HUGE* EE announcement at Midnight. These do my head in - we do not need them as they only ruin the suprise.”

To be fair EastEnders has been quite good at keeping surprises under wraps lately. Most of their big announcements have been casting news which they couldn't possibly have kept under wraps anyway. At least this way it makes it a bit of a big deal for fans.
wizzywick
30-09-2014
Originally Posted by yorkie100:
“Was just going to say that I have enjoyed EE the last couple of days and then I find that apparently there is another *HUGE* EE announcement at Midnight. These do my head in - we do not need them as they only ruin the suprise.”

Peggy is returning!!!!!!! I bet Peggy is returning!!!!! Last Thursday was a set up for Peggy returning!!!!
yorkie100
30-09-2014
Originally Posted by johnnymc:
“I only watched one to be fair so maybe it wasn't a good episode. But I was trying to see why viewers had surged to this format and someone told me it was really an excellent show. I thought it was just really quite an ordinary Channel 4 show that wouldn't be out of place in daytime. But its multi award winning! Its got a good rating to some of BBC one Friday evening comedies too.”

Of course its multi award winning - its on Channel 4 !!!

2 flies crawling up a wall for an hour would win an award on 4.
AlexiR
30-09-2014
Originally Posted by wizzywick:
“Peggy is returning!!!!!!! I bet Peggy is returning!!!!! Last Thursday was a set up for Peggy returning!!!!”

God I hope not. Her brief appearance last week was enough to remind me of why I was glad to see the back of her.
cylon6
30-09-2014
Originally Posted by iaindb:
“BIB: BAFTA already do this with the programmes - best single drama, best mini-series, best drama series.”

But not with actors. It took years to have actor/actress sitcom categories separate to entertainment performance.
Originally Posted by johnnymc:
“I think maybe they divided it years ago once?? Lancashire was outstanding and really raw in her performance, Keeley Hawes looks less likely to win now for "Line Of Duty" which is now all the way into May 2015 at the BAFTA ceremony, maybe Gillian Anderson will get another nod too for her part in "The Fall", we have yet to see her in full flow! I think Aneurin Barnard also deserves best supporting actor for his part in the "Cilla" story, somewhere along the line. But the National Television Awards will be firt, where im thinking Sheridan Smith will beat Sarah Lancashire as there may a sway from ITV viewers.”

I think Keeley Hawes will be nominated but Sarah Lancashire and Sheridan Smith are the frontrunners. Gillian Anderson wasn't nominated for the first series of The Fall. I think she deserved to get in. She might make it this time.

As for Supporting Actor I wouldn't rule out James Norton for Happy Valley. There will be some very hotly contested categories next year.
yorkie100
30-09-2014
Originally Posted by AlexiR:
“To be fair EastEnders has been quite good at keeping surprises under wraps lately. Most of their big announcements have been casting news which they couldn't possibly have kept under wraps anyway. At least this way it makes it a bit of a big deal for fans.”

Thats true actually - they do seem to be trying.
johnnymc
30-09-2014
Originally Posted by cylon6:
“But not with actors. It took years to have actor/actress sitcom categories separate to entertainment performance.


I think Keeley Hawes will be nominated but Sarah Lancashire and Sheridan Smith are the frontrunners. Gillian Anderson wasn't nominated for the first series of The Fall. I think she deserved to get in. She might make it this time.

As for Supporting Actor I wouldn't rule out James Norton for Happy Valley. There will be some very hotly contested categories next year.”

Oh yeah forgot about him! Mmm wish we had "The National Television Awards" in October again!!

Be interesting to see what James Norton does with "Grantchester" he showed great promise as a star in "Happy Valley" but was outshone by Sarah Lancashire, I would like to see what he can do as a lead.
NeilVW
30-09-2014
Wasn't ITV's transition from Pop Idol to X Factor Cowell's doing? That is, he was seen as instrumental to the success of such a show and he gave them an ultimatum?

I might be getting confused with American Idol when he stopped being a judge and started X Factor over there.
cylon6
30-09-2014
Originally Posted by yorkie100:
“Was just going to say that I have enjoyed EE the last couple of days and then I find that apparently there is another *HUGE* EE announcement at Midnight. These do my head in - we do not need them as they only ruin the suprise.”

There's a midnight announcement? I wonder if it's character or plot?
<<
<
487 of 536
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map