Originally Posted by wizzywick:
“I think I agree with all you've written. The X-Factor dilemma is a tricky one but also a worrying one. It demonstrates further just how weak British television is these days if just one day's schedule is causing such problems. As few as just twenty years ago you would have monster schedules on both channels at the same time because there genuinely was far more choice on the two main channels back then. Okay, ITV would usually have around 4-5m more viewers but if an ITV drama got 13m you could bet that BBC1's opposition got a healthy 10m to counter it. Now we have both BBC1 and ITV running scared of a just a handful of hits. I think that is something that needs addressing.”
I agree that its something that needs addressing but I'm also not entirely sure what the solution is. There appears to be only three options here. Either they continue with the current strategy that doesn't appear to be working or they try airing things like Our Zoo on Sunday night opposite The X Factor or Downton Abbey (how do people think Our Zoo would have done on Sunday night with a Strictly lead-in?) or they just abandon airing these kind of dramas during the Autumn. None of those seem like particularly great options. I suppose in a perfect world what the BBC may have been hoping for here is that Our Zoo establishes a big audience on Wednesday night in series one giving them the confidence to then move it to Sunday night for series two but that obviously hasn't happened here. It didn't happen with The Paradise either. I suppose the other alternative might be to try moving an established hit to Sunday night in the Autumn although the BBC is rather short on those these days.
Originally Posted by Dancc:
“Let them down slightly after very strong figures 8PM-10PM. Share is still okay but as for why it's continuing to lose viewers, that would be beyond me. Starting to think Five's drama output is cursed as nothing will stick. A lot resting on Gotham. If even that doesn't rate maybe we'll start to see less drama on the main channel and an increased focus on factual/reality as well as some comedy.”
They do seem to be having a rather tough time of it with drama as of late. Its a shame really because I think their instinct of trying to broaden their drama appeal is the right one it just hasn't really paid off with shows like Dallas, Under the Dome and now seemingly Wentworth. Although for at least two of those I suppose the quality of the show hasn't exactly helped them. It'll be interesting to see how Gotham does for them. As you say if it doesn't work out then I suspect they'll have to go back to the drawing board.
Originally Posted by guestofseth:
“I still don't quite understand the fuss over the edit..”
I think all the noise about the edit is just a sign of how big the show now is. I suspect had that exact incident unfolded while the show was on BBC2 it would have gone largely unnoticed because the press wouldn't have jumped on it in quite the same way but now its pulling such big figures and very clearly become a big mainstream hit they want/need to write about it. The same is true of shows like The X Factor, Strictly and Big Brother back in its height. Incidents that ultimately aren't that out of character for the show in general get blown out of all proportion because writing about it sells more papers/brings more hits.
Originally Posted by Fudd:
“I agree with that though it does beg the question how the same production company can get create a softer tone for Britain's Got Talent than The X Factor. Especially when the former started off as the far nastier show.”
But they made a very focused effort to make Britain's Got Talent nicer. Having kids breakdown on live television and making everyone feel very uncomfortable about the show will do that. With The X Factor I think the 'nastiness' (although I'm sure the production team have a better word for it) has just become awkwardly fused into its DNA. Just as importantly I don't know that they can substantially walk it back now that The Voice is out there as 'the nice singing competition'. This is ultimately one of the major problems the US version of the show had. At a time when audiences were clearly embracing the more feel good factor of The Voice (at least in the US) it debuted full of that rather nasty X Factor undercurrent and it just didn't work but they then couldn't ever effectively walk it back without it looking like they were trying to mimic The Voice's tone. To be honest I'm not convinced the show needs to be nicer I think it maybe needs to blunter or more direct. Mel B's handling of the 6 Chair Challenge has gotten rave reviews from fans not because she was nice but because she was just straight to the point and quite blunt about thinking certain acts weren't good enough. That kind of bluntness is what endeared Simon Cowell to the public in the first place as well and I suspect its something the show needs to bring back in force rather than playing up indecision for drama.