Originally Posted by Chris1964:
“Yes I think GG worked so well in the seventies because the public were so out of place on tv back then. Most people were stilted and a fish out of water which played so well into SBF hands as he could manoeuvre them so easily but without humiliating them. It just worked.”
“Yes I think GG worked so well in the seventies because the public were so out of place on tv back then. Most people were stilted and a fish out of water which played so well into SBF hands as he could manoeuvre them so easily but without humiliating them. It just worked.”
The revival's best chance to work is if it is sold as a comedy vehicle for Miranda. That's how it worked for Larry Grayson when he took over from Brucie. With Sir Bruce, it was always about how bad (or occasionally, good) the contestants were at the games. Larry took part in the games and was as bad or worse than the contestants were.
Steve Williams may be able to correct me if I'm wrong, but I understand that LGGG was initially as successful as BFGG in the ratings and beat Brucie's lavish Big Night series in the Saturday ratings. But ratings slipped for Larry when Game For A Laugh turned up.



