People who say that I can't be considered a smoker, simply because I have at most three a day.
Trivial things that annoy you intensely. (Part 3)
97 of 490
Originally Posted by EStaffs90:
“People who say that I can't be considered a smoker, simply because I have at most three a day.”
“People who say that I can't be considered a smoker, simply because I have at most three a day.”
And you want to be considered a smoker?
I brought a money pot from tesco so my and my oh can save our pennies and money as we are expecting.... the plan was to take out the cash as and when we needed it, for a baby monitor etc. However there is no way to get the money out without either shaking it or smashing it. It seem silly to me that you can't get your savings out!
Originally Posted by vickkij:
“I brought a money pot from tesco so my and my oh can save our pennies and money as we are expecting.... the plan was to take out the cash as and when we needed it, for a baby monitor etc. However there is no way to get the money out without either shaking it or smashing it. It seem silly to me that you can't get your savings out!”
“I brought a money pot from tesco so my and my oh can save our pennies and money as we are expecting.... the plan was to take out the cash as and when we needed it, for a baby monitor etc. However there is no way to get the money out without either shaking it or smashing it. It seem silly to me that you can't get your savings out!”
Surely that's the idea? So you dont end up taking out a few quid here and there. Just keep topping it up until that mother is full. Then whack the hell out of it and release all that monies.
Originally Posted by Syntax Error:
“1) Household cleaning products that only kill 99.9% of all bacteria!
It's a shame they can't invent one that kill off the 0.01% of bacteria that are really harmful!”
“1) Household cleaning products that only kill 99.9% of all bacteria!
It's a shame they can't invent one that kill off the 0.01% of bacteria that are really harmful!”
They probably do but they can't prove it and so can't claim the 100%.
Hearing motorbike noises in the distance while i'm trying to sleep.
It sounded like a race track outside my house for half an hour just now!
It sounded like a race track outside my house for half an hour just now!
Originally Posted by vickkij:
“I brought a money pot from tesco so my and my oh can save our pennies and money as we are expecting.... the plan was to take out the cash as and when we needed it, for a baby monitor etc. However there is no way to get the money out without either shaking it or smashing it. It seem silly to me that you can't get your savings out!”
“I brought a money pot from tesco so my and my oh can save our pennies and money as we are expecting.... the plan was to take out the cash as and when we needed it, for a baby monitor etc. However there is no way to get the money out without either shaking it or smashing it. It seem silly to me that you can't get your savings out!”
I'd use an old coffee jar, and put the money I would have spent on a Tesco money box in the jar. (Not that I know how much they cost, but it sounds a bit gimmicky to me, unless it's given as a gift to a child to encourage saving their pennies.)
And congrats on the forthcoming baby.
Erik Satie's Gymnope - absolute perfection apart from one note 
, one single note feels like a rotten gerkin in a line up of Victoria Secret Models and it bugs me every single darn time - and it ain't just a mistake by this pianist as it is there in other recordings too.
Beethovens Moonlight Sonata suffers from the same 'almost pefect but for the gerkin' probleml, though it has that note played twice. (my bad, have it running now and it is four times )
Now I'm no composer but surely these are obvious mistakes that shoulda been fixed, darn it.
, one single note feels like a rotten gerkin in a line up of Victoria Secret Models and it bugs me every single darn time - and it ain't just a mistake by this pianist as it is there in other recordings too.Beethovens Moonlight Sonata suffers from the same 'almost pefect but for the gerkin' probleml, though it has that note played twice.
(my bad, have it running now and it is four times ) Now I'm no composer but surely these are obvious mistakes that shoulda been fixed, darn it.
The multiple (and often identical) Vine video clips and photos that I have to scroll through when viewing Twitter search result pages.
Why is there always at least one tosser in your local neighbourhood who has a car with a "make it louder" exhaust, who thinks people are going to think he has a bigger willy if he squeals the wheels round car parks and drives at dangerous speeds down narrow streets?
Originally Posted by barbeler:
“Why is there always at least one tosser in your local neighbourhood who has a car with a "make it louder" exhaust, who thinks people are going to think he has a bigger willy if he squeals the wheels round car parks and drives at dangerous speeds down narrow streets?”
“Why is there always at least one tosser in your local neighbourhood who has a car with a "make it louder" exhaust, who thinks people are going to think he has a bigger willy if he squeals the wheels round car parks and drives at dangerous speeds down narrow streets?”
Yeah, my twenty eight year old neighbour has a Subaru with the loudest twin exhausts ever and manages to back-fire several times as he roars up the road. Needless to say, he doesn't have a girl friend.
Originally Posted by barbeler:
“Why is there always at least one tosser in your local neighbourhood who has a car with a "make it louder" exhaust, who thinks people are going to think he has a bigger willy if he squeals the wheels round car parks and drives at dangerous speeds down narrow streets?”
“Why is there always at least one tosser in your local neighbourhood who has a car with a "make it louder" exhaust, who thinks people are going to think he has a bigger willy if he squeals the wheels round car parks and drives at dangerous speeds down narrow streets?”
Oh yes definitely this, we have one of these idiots living beside us at the minute with 3 friends who all drive a house shaking car each so 4 in total. Any time we have a little bit of ice you hear the cars speeding up and down the street and then in the morning you find all the landscaped areas covered in skid marks. I honestly don't know how or why his parents let him behave like that, he will end up crashing the car some day.
Originally Posted by Syntax Error:
“1) Household cleaning products that only kill 99.9% of all bacteria!
It's a shame they can't invent one that kill off the 0.01% of bacteria that are really harmful!”
“1) Household cleaning products that only kill 99.9% of all bacteria!
It's a shame they can't invent one that kill off the 0.01% of bacteria that are really harmful!”
Chances are they do pretty much kill all the bacteria, but what you are up against is a thing called "detection limits". In terms of bacteria your limits of detection is around 12 colony forming units per square centimetre. So even if all of them are all dead, you can only report it as "less than 12" when you measure them. So if you start off with 1,300,000 cfu/cm² and drop it to <12cfu/cm² that is 99.99% reduction because you do the calculation with the 12.
So you can't claim to have killed that last 0.01% because you couldn't see it if it was there, so you can't know for sure that it isn't there when you don't find it.
There's a new bloke across the way from me in the office.
He has the most annoying little chuckle - which he seems to do fare more frequently than anyone should. He also talks about his cats as if they are children. He doesn't seem to miss an opportunity to show a photograph of them which he keeps in his wallet. The antics of the cats seem to fill about 80% of his conversations. When he isn't talking about the cats he's doing that annoying chuckle.
He has the most annoying little chuckle - which he seems to do fare more frequently than anyone should. He also talks about his cats as if they are children. He doesn't seem to miss an opportunity to show a photograph of them which he keeps in his wallet. The antics of the cats seem to fill about 80% of his conversations. When he isn't talking about the cats he's doing that annoying chuckle.
Originally Posted by vickkij:
“I brought a money pot from tesco so my and my oh can save our pennies and money as we are expecting.... the plan was to take out the cash as and when we needed it, for a baby monitor etc. However there is no way to get the money out without either shaking it or smashing it. It seem silly to me that you can't get your savings out!”
“I brought a money pot from tesco so my and my oh can save our pennies and money as we are expecting.... the plan was to take out the cash as and when we needed it, for a baby monitor etc. However there is no way to get the money out without either shaking it or smashing it. It seem silly to me that you can't get your savings out!”
That is the purpose of them, So you don't spend the money without breaking the thing and not many people will be willing to do that
It is actually a good idea to stop the temptation to take a pound here and there
However for your purpose it isn't ideal, More for people to save money for a year etc and then use it
Social media "good deeds". The fat dancing guy getting invited to LA out of someone's craving for publicit...out of the goodness of their own heart is one example.
Over-excited showbiz journalists. "Kylie's on tour!!! Totes amaze"
Over-excited showbiz journalists. "Kylie's on tour!!! Totes amaze"
That I have important shizz to type up and I'm struggling to find the concentration levels to achieve it...
Originally Posted by Paul_DNAP:
“Chances are they do pretty much kill all the bacteria, but what you are up against is a thing called "detection limits". In terms of bacteria your limits of detection is around 12 colony forming units per square centimetre. So even if all of them are all dead, you can only report it as "less than 12" when you measure them. So if you start off with 1,300,000 cfu/cm² and drop it to <12cfu/cm² that is 99.99% reduction because you do the calculation with the 12.
So you can't claim to have killed that last 0.01% because you couldn't see it if it was there, so you can't know for sure that it isn't there when you don't find it.”
“Chances are they do pretty much kill all the bacteria, but what you are up against is a thing called "detection limits". In terms of bacteria your limits of detection is around 12 colony forming units per square centimetre. So even if all of them are all dead, you can only report it as "less than 12" when you measure them. So if you start off with 1,300,000 cfu/cm² and drop it to <12cfu/cm² that is 99.99% reduction because you do the calculation with the 12.
So you can't claim to have killed that last 0.01% because you couldn't see it if it was there, so you can't know for sure that it isn't there when you don't find it.”
I am always impressed with people that can do this, my brain does not compute it!!
Also, i really, really like the last sentence as if you said it out loud it would confuse a lot of people even though it makes perfect sense..... i think i may have a little tiny crush on you lol...........
.......don't panic though, i am old..and short
Originally Posted by makavelli132:
“Cold sandwiches...”
“Cold sandwiches...”
Why don't you like cold sandwiches? If you had hot sandwiches the bread would go all floppy and yucky, you would need a crusty roll and then it would be a roll not a sarnie
Originally Posted by mintoe:
“Why don't you like cold sandwiches? If you had hot sandwiches the bread would go all floppy and yucky, you would need a crusty roll and then it would be a roll not a sarnie”
“Why don't you like cold sandwiches? If you had hot sandwiches the bread would go all floppy and yucky, you would need a crusty roll and then it would be a roll not a sarnie
”
Room temperature is okay.
The sandwiches from boots always seem so cold that they are like biting into ice.
Originally Posted by cherrychocolate:
“Adults who call their parents mummy or daddy. Bugs me plenty.”
“Adults who call their parents mummy or daddy. Bugs me plenty.”
That's just wrong on so many levels!
I'm annoyed with myself.
I'm working part-time on a six-month trial. I thought it'd be good to reduce long working hours and blah blah. So far? I pretty much did nothing but procrastinate today.
Quite odd. Seeing that when I was working full time (at office and in home office), I could focus on tasks easily when at home. Yet since last Monday when I started working part-time, it's procrastination almost all the way.
At this rate, I might have to cancel the trial this Friday and return to full time. :/
I'm working part-time on a six-month trial. I thought it'd be good to reduce long working hours and blah blah. So far? I pretty much did nothing but procrastinate today.
Quite odd. Seeing that when I was working full time (at office and in home office), I could focus on tasks easily when at home. Yet since last Monday when I started working part-time, it's procrastination almost all the way.
At this rate, I might have to cancel the trial this Friday and return to full time. :/
97 of 490
