Originally Posted by thenetworkbabe:
“It should be on performance but with some allowance for past performance. but then you couldn't give votes to stop Konnie getting none. Performance too is subjective (Richard !)though and how do you know why you like something.”
I don't think it has to be about performance. I think it's entriely reasonable to say someone should stay becuase they have potential or they've worked hard or even that they're fun to have around (which btw was pretty much Kim's reason for voting for Konnie).
But if someone's been using "tonight's performance" again and again, and then they suddenly switch to "tries hard an has come a long way", or whatever it was, then it's like changing the rules in the middle of a game.
The student vote is now a nasty tarpit and a potential show-ruiner.
I think Reggie would have understood a "tonight's performance" from Edith. I don't think he'd have seen it as a stab in the back. And I think a lot of people would have felt better about that, and would continue to feel that the student vote -- which has been almost completely uncontroversial up to now -- could be trusted not to produce a perverse result.
Quote:
“In this FA it is no longer clear what the criteria are. Its obviously not singing alone as Reggie got more votes than Dawn and Ade is still there for being the flying mute. Once it becomes clear that the public is voting on lots of grounds (and David has told them that too), given there are no rules on how to vote, Ade and Edith can vote with their hearts or heads on any criteria they want rather than their ears.”
It is not at all clear that the public is voting on lots of grounds. What is clear is that the students were pretty reliably voting for the best performances, based on both singing and other entertainment factors, and have now switch to voting in some other way.
(When other reasons were given, it was usually, maybe always, when it didn't matter, because the "performance" vote was enough to determine the result.)