Yep, that's the one I remember.

That's the latest one, Chris and Ashleigh talking about her and her listening in, from last night.

For some reason the producers have let Helen run the house she has got away with every unpleasant thing she has done. I thought she was told that if she had another warning she would be removed from the house. So, this time was she given a formal warning? I don't think she was if not why not?
Why are they so scared of upsetting her? Pass should have been revoked and Helen up for eviction. They have given Chris a really hard time this past week and by, foul means got him up for eviction. Double standards?
Will they fix it for her to win too?

The thing is no one believes for a nanosecond that Ashleigh was doing more than cross Verbals like we all do ['I'm gonna kill him!'] whereas Helen seems genuinely threatening.

That's true, only Helen seemsactually capable of lashing out and needing to be restrained, she would frighten me when she is in full rant mode, she gets pyschotic

But the OP is right. They seem to have no consequences. We have seen housemates getting several warnings - Caroline and Scott a couple of years ago come to mind - and nothing happened to them at all. Someone said that Scott had had 8; we saw him getting three. I'm not saying he should have been thrown out - he was nothing worse than silly and immature - but what IS the point in giving someone warning after warning?

'Little known fact', eh? Did your insider say why we didn't see her getting any, or doing anything that would merit a warning?

I don't believe a single word.

the reason Helen gets warnings is to remind the viewers we are only a few hours from the next chinese takeway being delivered to the house followed by a big party with lots of alcohol

Age again, what difference does that make.

Helen Wood is a mercenary, uncaring skidmark on the arse of society.

So would i if i had heard an 18 yr old talking about me.

Maybe you need to grow up then?

The same 18year old who threatened to smash Christopher's face. Lovely lass.

This. ^^

It wasn't really a warning, just a reminder.

no, a warning label isnt a chat. a warning is just a reminder, a stern reminder but it isnt by itself anything more.

There seemed to be something on the front of the Daily Star about Helen getting her own Towie style show - it that is true then maybe that is why they won't throw her out.

I can't for the life of me understand why it hasn't been revoked ??

I'll second this.

Does anybody actually believe a word of what the Daily Star says? They're the only source of the story that Helen has had 20 warnings, so I don't know if I should believe that either.

Everybody seems to think the warning she got after "invading Matthew's personal space" (gosh, how awful!) was her final one, so how could she have had loads more and still be there?

Yet another warning, utterly ridiculous. All they are doing is endorsing her behaviour to the watching public, and as they seem to think they have a teen audience it's even more reprehensible.

I hope to hear 'Get Helen Out' chants loud and clear at the eviction, as I think she might walk then.

Why didn't Chris get a formal warning for his highly offensive language?


He said Helen was hot.

Was it a warning or a talk from BB telling her to take it down a notch? I didn't hear the words 'formal warning' come from Big Brother at all.


Not threatening, saying she'd like to ... much as I would like to smother my ex-husband in his bed but I never have


We keep hearing about these never-seen warnings from various BB fan sites, but never from an official BB source - if it's not official then who can say they are true and not just the ramblings of a site that wants to feel like it knows something we don't?


That's how I saw it too.


It also says that Rooney would be appearing on it ... you still believe it now?

Ah no, that's just the silly headline. Someone has told the Star (and apparently the Mirror) that she would like to star in a Manchester version of Towie along with people she knows, who would be happy to get drunk and take their clothes off. There is nothing about this concept that ranks above hopeless.

What IS likely is that papers will want her 'what Wayne Rooney is like in bed' story and will pay her a fair sum for it. Which is pretty disgusting imo, but no one can stop her; and the fact that both the Star and the mirror are flattering her suggest that they are interested.

Gone are the days when a warning meant something. It's all for show now.