Originally Posted by sheila blige:
“They should have made a way for Tony to have been Tina's killer - then they could have had the character Rob (who is growing more and more likable with each episode) stay on for longer. As it is - we know that Rob will eventually be caught and will have to be written out and then we're stuck with deadwood like Tony and Lloyd for the foreseeable future.
It was great to see Jim back though ... so it was! And in the Big Hoose too!”
Originally Posted by boogie woogie:
“I agree. Given that they have brought back Jim, it would have made a lot more sense if Tony was Tina's killer, rather than Rob. Whilst Peter is still in the frame for the crime, it would have made sense for Peter to have suspected that Tony was the culprit. We could have had Peter telling Jim of his suspicions and Jim appealing to Liz that her boyfriend is a killer. It would have been an ideal opportunity to involve the Grimshaws in the storyline, potentially with Eva and Todd slowly piecing together that Tony is the culprit.”
Agree. They missed a trick. This story could've been so much better. The aftermath has been quite dull and not far reaching enough. Ken and Jim have brought the story back to life a bit but the minute Rob was revealed as the killer, I filed this one under 'missed opportunities.' The reveal might give us a good week of episodes but the Barlows will be a lot poorer without Rob and Peter.
Originally Posted by Kazza81:
“It's a much better summer than last year.
I was only interested in the Rob scams Carla story last summer”
Don't forget Killer Karl which climaxed in September, aftermath of David/Nick crash and Hayley dealing with her cancer diagnosis. Last summer was infinitely better despite the 'play the white man' caper which at least ridded us of Paul and Mandy.