It was a bit vindictive, but blame who ever came up with the idea of giving Helen a pass to the final, if viewers can't get her out then they have no choice but to lash out at her pals.

She won't win, she'll make a 2nd or 3rd, I think Mr Diet Coke will win it.

He's done nothing right either, because he's just done nothing.

Unlike the HMs, the public are not required to give reasons for their votes.

I normally see eye to eye with the general consensus on most internet polls and this forum every year but for the life of me I don't get what the fans are thinking this year.

I get Ashleigh and Chris were the underdogs and weren't in the popular group and it's always good to see people like that win but come one they have to at least have some redeeming qualities. They're 2 of the most miserable people I have ever come across and neither deserve to win.

Don't get me wrong, I don't particularly like any of them this year, they're the most unlikable bunch of housemates I've ever seen but for me Winston is comfortably the best of a pretty awful bunch of people (although I thought I'd hate him at the beginning).

This thread confuses me.

Did Tamara deserve to get chucked out first?

There is no 'deserve' in all of this. The whole series is skewed due to Helen being exempt. Therefore, it's her fault

He has done nothing interesting either,gormless Joey Essex wannabe.

Well said. The voice of reason.

Whats her age got to do with anything?

He's a self absorbed idiot.

Good Riddance, I say.

Really disappointed Winston got evicted, thought he was a decent guy. There's no way Pav deserves a place in the final.

Why Chris? He has been involved most of the series, it's Pav that has over stayed his time. Sadly he stand a good chance in cashing in his sympathy card on Friday.

spot on. He was fun, a gentleman and I'm gutted he's gone

I am not really bothered who wins out of Pav, Chris, Ashleigh & Christopher.

I wanted Winny out purely because he is an oaf, another Sam winner & I did also want to see Helen & Ash' reaction, I won't lie and boy - that was good

You know the show's in a dire state when "he's done nothing wrong" is used as a reason as to why someone should not have been evicted

He was boring with nothing of value to add apart from a "yeah yeah" here and there.

I agree with you, and im not even a chris fan anymore, yes Danielle didn't deserve to go unfortunately, don't know why people are shocked if you went by this forum Winston would of gone, housemates base whose popular on crowd reaction alone, forgetting that there's only about 300-500 people in the crowd. The bookies got it wrong again.

He went because he was too cocky and thought he had it in the bag.
Also he was excruciatingly dull and the 'meat-head' act didn't work.

Who be that? I hope it's Christopher

The funny thing is, Ashleigh or Helen winning wouldn't be any different. Both nasty vindictive bitches, they are so much alike which is why they clash.

Oh. I assume you missed all his constant nasty sniggering and laughing at people who happened to be on the wrong end of Helen's gang's intimidating crap.
Well done public. A brilliant result!

Agree, it's nice to see something go the underdogs way for once.

I like Winston but to say he didn't 'deserve that' like some awful thing has occured reads a bit strange to me. I mean, it's an eviction - someone needed to go. Why not Winston? Seems fair enough to me, albeit surprising.

Many are blinkered by their hate for Helen. It doesn't matter to them that Ashleigh is just as bad (worse IMO) and Chris is manipulating the whole divide and manipulating his audience, to boot. I suppose some people are less discerning than others, I guess.

Who did deserve it then? No-one is more or less deserving whoever you like!

Pav I guess would be the obvious choice.